A biopsychosocial profile of the geriatric population who frequently visit the emergency department.

M Brokaw, A S Zaraa
{"title":"A biopsychosocial profile of the geriatric population who frequently visit the emergency department.","authors":"M Brokaw,&nbsp;A S Zaraa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last two decades the emergency department has become the primary source of health care for a large segment of the population. While this practice is discouraged by ED staff and primary care providers, it is an unfortunate reality. Recent literature has examined the use of the ED from many different angles. Areas investigated include various demographics (age, sex, race, etc.), method of payment, presenting complaint, and availability of primary care. Repeated inappropriate use of ED services by individuals (the so called \"frequent fliers\") has also attracted attention. The interest in this sub-population of patients is presumably due to the prevalence as well as the excessive costs of this behavior. In the present study a retrospective chart review was used to establish the biopsychosocial profiles of geriatric patients identified as being frequently seen in the emergency department for non-urgent conditions. Even though only 11% of the US population is age 65 or older, the elderly in America consume 30% of the health care resources, and in the next 20 years that figure is expected to climb to 50% (1). Demographics, ED presentation, diagnosis, and treatment as well as past medical history were collected. The objectives of the study were to identify these elderly frequent fliers and determine what could be the reasons behind the inappropriate use of emergency department resources by these patients. The average age of the sample was 74. The marital status of the sample was as follows: 42.4% widowed, 27.2% married, 15% divorced, and 18.5% single. Over half (52.6%) of those patients were brought to the ED by ambulance. The most common presenting complaint was chest pain (20.8%), followed by somatic complaints (18.9%), GI (16.1%), dyspnea (13.7%), and change in mental status (12.8%). The most prevalent ED diagnosis was psychiatric (18.4%) in nature. The other diagnoses were somatic (16.6%), GI (11.8%), and pulmonary (10.9%). 88.5% of the sample reported to have a primary care physician. However, 45% of the ED visits occurred between 9 AM and 5 PM at a time when a physician should have been available. The admission rate for this sample was 21.9%, which is half what has been found in the \"normal\" elderly, as reported by McDonald and Abrahams.</p>","PeriodicalId":77582,"journal":{"name":"Ohio medicine : journal of the Ohio State Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio medicine : journal of the Ohio State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last two decades the emergency department has become the primary source of health care for a large segment of the population. While this practice is discouraged by ED staff and primary care providers, it is an unfortunate reality. Recent literature has examined the use of the ED from many different angles. Areas investigated include various demographics (age, sex, race, etc.), method of payment, presenting complaint, and availability of primary care. Repeated inappropriate use of ED services by individuals (the so called "frequent fliers") has also attracted attention. The interest in this sub-population of patients is presumably due to the prevalence as well as the excessive costs of this behavior. In the present study a retrospective chart review was used to establish the biopsychosocial profiles of geriatric patients identified as being frequently seen in the emergency department for non-urgent conditions. Even though only 11% of the US population is age 65 or older, the elderly in America consume 30% of the health care resources, and in the next 20 years that figure is expected to climb to 50% (1). Demographics, ED presentation, diagnosis, and treatment as well as past medical history were collected. The objectives of the study were to identify these elderly frequent fliers and determine what could be the reasons behind the inappropriate use of emergency department resources by these patients. The average age of the sample was 74. The marital status of the sample was as follows: 42.4% widowed, 27.2% married, 15% divorced, and 18.5% single. Over half (52.6%) of those patients were brought to the ED by ambulance. The most common presenting complaint was chest pain (20.8%), followed by somatic complaints (18.9%), GI (16.1%), dyspnea (13.7%), and change in mental status (12.8%). The most prevalent ED diagnosis was psychiatric (18.4%) in nature. The other diagnoses were somatic (16.6%), GI (11.8%), and pulmonary (10.9%). 88.5% of the sample reported to have a primary care physician. However, 45% of the ED visits occurred between 9 AM and 5 PM at a time when a physician should have been available. The admission rate for this sample was 21.9%, which is half what has been found in the "normal" elderly, as reported by McDonald and Abrahams.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经常到急诊科就诊的老年人口的生物心理社会概况。
在过去的二十年中,急诊科已成为大部分人口的主要医疗保健来源。虽然这种做法不被急诊室工作人员和初级保健提供者所鼓励,但这是一个不幸的现实。最近的文献从许多不同的角度研究了ED的使用。调查的领域包括各种人口统计数据(年龄、性别、种族等)、支付方式、提出投诉和初级保健的可获得性。个人(即所谓的“常旅客”)多次不当使用ED服务也引起了人们的注意。对这一亚群患者的兴趣可能是由于这种行为的普遍性以及过高的成本。在本研究中,回顾性的图表审查,以建立生物心理社会特征的老年患者被确定为经常出现在急诊科的非紧急情况。尽管只有11%的美国人口年龄在65岁或以上,但美国老年人消耗了30%的医疗资源,在未来20年,这一数字预计将攀升至50%(1)。我们收集了人口统计学、ED表现、诊断、治疗以及既往病史。本研究的目的是确定这些老年飞行常客,并确定这些患者不适当使用急诊科资源背后的原因。样本的平均年龄为74岁。样本的婚姻状况如下:42.4%丧偶,27.2%已婚,15%离婚,18.5%单身。超过一半(52.6%)的患者被救护车送到急诊科。最常见的主诉是胸痛(20.8%),其次是躯体主诉(18.9%)、GI(16.1%)、呼吸困难(13.7%)和精神状态改变(12.8%)。最普遍的ED诊断是精神科(18.4%)。其他诊断为躯体(16.6%)、胃肠道(11.8%)和肺部(10.9%)。88.5%的样本报告有初级保健医生。然而,45%的急诊科就诊发生在上午9点到下午5点之间,而这段时间应该有医生。根据麦克唐纳和亚伯拉罕的报告,该样本的录取率为21.9%,是“正常”老年人的一半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Matisse. Our good will toward the people of Ohio. Indirect costs on research grants and contracts. Silica theory not proven. CDC calls for AIDS testing for hospital patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1