Defusing Leverage: Liquidity Management and Labor Contracts

E. Acabbi, A. Alati
{"title":"Defusing Leverage: Liquidity Management and Labor Contracts","authors":"E. Acabbi, A. Alati","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3768825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rigidities in firms’ payroll structures are likely to increase the transmission of shocks to firms’ cash flows and profitability. By using Italian administrative data on workers careers and firms’ balance sheets, we study how the use of permanent and fixed-term labor contracts affects this pass-through. We document how firms use the contract composition of their workforce to manage the risk determined by their labor-induced operating leverage. First, we confirm that a higher labor share is associated with more volatile cash flows following unexpected real shocks, a telling indication of operating leverage at work through labor costs. Second, we show that firms with a greater share of temporary contracts are characterized by a smoother time-series behavior of their cash-flows. In particular, the smoothing effect is stronger for firms with higher labor share related to the permanent workforce. We complement this analysis with the study of the 2001 labor market reform that lifted constraints on the creation of temporary contracts. Exploiting the staggered implementation of the reform across different collective bargaining agreements, we show that, following the reform, firms increased on average their share of temporary contracts and decreased average labor compensation. In addition, we show that, only among firms with an ex-ante more rigid labor cost structure, earlier transition to a more flexible workforce composition led to a 1 percentage point increase in profit margins (against a -1.6pp average variation around the event) and a 5 percent decrease in the cross-sectional standard deviation of profits.<br>","PeriodicalId":430354,"journal":{"name":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3768825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Rigidities in firms’ payroll structures are likely to increase the transmission of shocks to firms’ cash flows and profitability. By using Italian administrative data on workers careers and firms’ balance sheets, we study how the use of permanent and fixed-term labor contracts affects this pass-through. We document how firms use the contract composition of their workforce to manage the risk determined by their labor-induced operating leverage. First, we confirm that a higher labor share is associated with more volatile cash flows following unexpected real shocks, a telling indication of operating leverage at work through labor costs. Second, we show that firms with a greater share of temporary contracts are characterized by a smoother time-series behavior of their cash-flows. In particular, the smoothing effect is stronger for firms with higher labor share related to the permanent workforce. We complement this analysis with the study of the 2001 labor market reform that lifted constraints on the creation of temporary contracts. Exploiting the staggered implementation of the reform across different collective bargaining agreements, we show that, following the reform, firms increased on average their share of temporary contracts and decreased average labor compensation. In addition, we show that, only among firms with an ex-ante more rigid labor cost structure, earlier transition to a more flexible workforce composition led to a 1 percentage point increase in profit margins (against a -1.6pp average variation around the event) and a 5 percent decrease in the cross-sectional standard deviation of profits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化解杠杆:流动性管理与劳动合同
企业工资结构的僵化可能会增加对企业现金流和盈利能力冲击的传导。通过使用意大利有关工人职业生涯和企业资产负债表的行政数据,我们研究了永久和固定期限劳动合同的使用如何影响这种传递。我们记录了企业如何利用其劳动力的合同构成来管理由其劳动诱发的经营杠杆决定的风险。首先,我们证实,在意外的实际冲击之后,较高的劳动收入占比与更不稳定的现金流相关,这是通过劳动力成本起作用的经营杠杆的一个明显迹象。其次,我们表明,拥有更多临时合同的企业,其现金流的时间序列行为更平滑。特别是,对于与永久劳动力相关的劳动份额较高的企业,平滑效应更强。我们对2001年劳动力市场改革的研究补充了这一分析,该改革解除了对创建临时合同的限制。利用不同集体谈判协议的交错实施改革,我们表明,在改革之后,企业平均增加了临时合同的份额,减少了平均劳动报酬。此外,我们表明,只有在事前劳动力成本结构更为刚性的公司中,较早地过渡到更灵活的劳动力构成,才能导致利润率增加1个百分点(相对于事件前后的平均变化为-1.6个百分点),利润的横截面标准差降低5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Order Statistics Approaches to Unobserved Heterogeneity in Auctions Who Bears the Load? Carbon Taxes and Electricity Markets Innovation Networks and Business-Stealing Designing a Competitive Monotone Signaling Equilibrium Rising Markups and the Role of Consumer Preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1