Comparison of nebulized fentanyl, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine as a sedative premedication in outpatient pediatric dental surgeries: a randomized double-blind study

M. Medhat, Sara Abd Elnaby
{"title":"Comparison of nebulized fentanyl, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine as a sedative premedication in outpatient pediatric dental surgeries: a randomized double-blind study","authors":"M. Medhat, Sara Abd Elnaby","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_10_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The preoperative time is traumatic for young children undergoing surgery. Parental separation and needle injection increase preoperative anxiety. Preoperative sedation in children is usually administered via the rectal, oral sublingual, and intranasal routes with different degrees of patient acceptance. Nebulized drug is an alternative method of sedation that is relatively easy to set up. Materials and Methods Thirty nine pediatric patients (2–6) years old scheduled for outpatient dental surgeries were randomly allocated in three groups (13 patients each); group (F) received nebulized fentanyl 2 μg/kg 30 min before surgery, group (M) received nebulized midazolam 0.2 mg/kg 30 min before surgery and group (D) received nebulized dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg 30 min before surgery. The outcome measures included onset of sedation, parental separation, tolerance to mask induction, reaction to intravenous cannulation and preoperative hemodynamic changes (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate). Results Children who received nebulized fentanyl and nebulized midazolam had early onset of sedation as compared to dexmedetomidine. In child-parent separation, quality of induction was better with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as compared to midazolam. Intravenous cannulation score was best achieved with fentanyl as premedication. Conclusion Nebulized fentanyl in a dose of 2 μg/kg is better than nebulized midazolam 0.2 mg/kg and nebulized dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg as far as premedication is concerned because of its early onset of action, deeper levels of sedation, easy child-parent separation and shorter duration of action.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_10_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background The preoperative time is traumatic for young children undergoing surgery. Parental separation and needle injection increase preoperative anxiety. Preoperative sedation in children is usually administered via the rectal, oral sublingual, and intranasal routes with different degrees of patient acceptance. Nebulized drug is an alternative method of sedation that is relatively easy to set up. Materials and Methods Thirty nine pediatric patients (2–6) years old scheduled for outpatient dental surgeries were randomly allocated in three groups (13 patients each); group (F) received nebulized fentanyl 2 μg/kg 30 min before surgery, group (M) received nebulized midazolam 0.2 mg/kg 30 min before surgery and group (D) received nebulized dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg 30 min before surgery. The outcome measures included onset of sedation, parental separation, tolerance to mask induction, reaction to intravenous cannulation and preoperative hemodynamic changes (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate). Results Children who received nebulized fentanyl and nebulized midazolam had early onset of sedation as compared to dexmedetomidine. In child-parent separation, quality of induction was better with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as compared to midazolam. Intravenous cannulation score was best achieved with fentanyl as premedication. Conclusion Nebulized fentanyl in a dose of 2 μg/kg is better than nebulized midazolam 0.2 mg/kg and nebulized dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg as far as premedication is concerned because of its early onset of action, deeper levels of sedation, easy child-parent separation and shorter duration of action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雾化芬太尼、咪达唑仑和右美托咪定在门诊儿童牙科手术中作为镇静前用药的比较:一项随机双盲研究
背景幼儿手术前的术前时间是创伤性的。父母分离和针头注射增加术前焦虑。儿童术前镇静通常经直肠、口腔、舌下和鼻内给药,患者接受程度不同。雾化药物是一种相对容易设置的镇静替代方法。材料与方法将39例2 ~ 6岁门诊牙科手术患儿随机分为3组(每组13例);F组患者术前30 min雾化芬太尼2 μg/kg, M组患者术前30 min雾化咪达唑仑0.2 mg/kg, D组患者术前30 min雾化右美托咪定2 μg/kg。结局指标包括镇静发作、父母分离、面罩诱导耐受性、静脉插管反应和术前血流动力学变化(收缩压、舒张压和心率)。结果与右美托咪定相比,芬太尼雾化组和咪达唑仑雾化组患儿镇静起效早。在亲子分离中,芬太尼和右美托咪定诱导质量优于咪达唑仑。静脉插管评分以芬太尼为前用药效果最好。结论芬太尼雾化剂量为2 μg/kg比雾化咪达唑仑0.2 mg/kg和雾化右美托咪定2 μg/kg起效早、镇静作用深、易分离、作用时间短,在用药前效果优于雾化剂量为2 μg/kg的咪达唑仑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1