A Re-Evaluation of the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in the Eurozone

Vasilios Plakandaras, Periklis Gogas, Theophilos Papadimitriou
{"title":"A Re-Evaluation of the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in the Eurozone","authors":"Vasilios Plakandaras, Periklis Gogas, Theophilos Papadimitriou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3275922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we re-evaluate the capital immobility hypothesis of Feldstein and Horioka (1980) for the case of the European Union and the Eurozone, based on long-run regressions. We employ the Long Run Derivative proposed by Fischer and Seater (1993) in order to examine capital mobility as a long-run phenomenon. In order to enhance the robustness of our results we also perform panel causality tests on our data as it is a common approach in this setting. Our empirical findings provide no evidence in favor of the capital immobility hypothesis. In fact, we reject capital immobility even before the creation of the European Union, the introduction of the Eurozone or the 2008 global financial crisis.","PeriodicalId":326599,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Comparative) (Topic)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Comparative) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3275922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper we re-evaluate the capital immobility hypothesis of Feldstein and Horioka (1980) for the case of the European Union and the Eurozone, based on long-run regressions. We employ the Long Run Derivative proposed by Fischer and Seater (1993) in order to examine capital mobility as a long-run phenomenon. In order to enhance the robustness of our results we also perform panel causality tests on our data as it is a common approach in this setting. Our empirical findings provide no evidence in favor of the capital immobility hypothesis. In fact, we reject capital immobility even before the creation of the European Union, the introduction of the Eurozone or the 2008 global financial crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧元区费尔德斯坦-堀冈之谜的再评价
在本文中,我们基于长期回归,重新评估费尔德斯坦和堀冈(1980)对欧盟和欧元区的资本不流动假设。我们采用Fischer和Seater(1993)提出的长期导数来检验资本流动作为一种长期现象。为了增强结果的稳健性,我们还对数据进行了面板因果检验,因为这是这种情况下的常用方法。我们的实证研究结果没有提供支持资本不流动假说的证据。事实上,早在欧盟成立、欧元区成立或2008年全球金融危机爆发之前,我们就反对资本不流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Sovereign Risk Premium on Bank Profitability: Evidence from Euro Area A New Macro-Financial Condition Index for the Euro Area The Anatomy of Government Bond Yields Synchronization in the Eurozone What Affects Bank Market Power in the Euro Area? A Structural Model Approach Financial Drivers of the Euro Area Business Cycle: A Dsge-Based Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1