Secure capabilities for a petabyte-scale object-based distributed file system

Christopher Olson, E. L. Miller
{"title":"Secure capabilities for a petabyte-scale object-based distributed file system","authors":"Christopher Olson, E. L. Miller","doi":"10.1145/1103780.1103791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the Network-Attached Secure Disk (NASD) model has become a more widely used technique for constructing large-scale storage systems. However, the security system proposed for NASD assumes that each client will contact the server to get a capability to access one object on a server. While this approach works well in smaller-scale systems in which each file is composed of a few objects, it fails for large-scale systems in which thousands of clients make accesses to a single file composed of thousands of objects spread across thousands of disks. The file system we are building, Ceph, distributes files across many objects and disks to distribute load and improve reliability. In such a system, the metadata server cluster will sometimes see thousands of open requests for the same file within seconds. To address this bottleneck, we propose new authentication protocols for object-based storage systems in which a sequence of fixed-size objects comprise a file and flash crowds are likely. We qualitatively evaluated the security and risks of each protocol, and, using traces of a scientific application, compared the overhead of each protocol. We found that, surprisingly, a protocol using public key cryptography incurred little extra cost while providing greater security than a protocol using only symmetric key cryptography.","PeriodicalId":413919,"journal":{"name":"ACM International Workshop on Storage Security And Survivability","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM International Workshop on Storage Security And Survivability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1103780.1103791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Recently, the Network-Attached Secure Disk (NASD) model has become a more widely used technique for constructing large-scale storage systems. However, the security system proposed for NASD assumes that each client will contact the server to get a capability to access one object on a server. While this approach works well in smaller-scale systems in which each file is composed of a few objects, it fails for large-scale systems in which thousands of clients make accesses to a single file composed of thousands of objects spread across thousands of disks. The file system we are building, Ceph, distributes files across many objects and disks to distribute load and improve reliability. In such a system, the metadata server cluster will sometimes see thousands of open requests for the same file within seconds. To address this bottleneck, we propose new authentication protocols for object-based storage systems in which a sequence of fixed-size objects comprise a file and flash crowds are likely. We qualitatively evaluated the security and risks of each protocol, and, using traces of a scientific application, compared the overhead of each protocol. We found that, surprisingly, a protocol using public key cryptography incurred little extra cost while providing greater security than a protocol using only symmetric key cryptography.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于pb级基于对象的分布式文件系统的安全功能
近年来,网络附加安全磁盘(NASD)模型已成为构建大型存储系统的一种广泛使用的技术。然而,为NASD提出的安全系统假设每个客户机都将与服务器联系,以获得访问服务器上一个对象的能力。虽然这种方法在每个文件由几个对象组成的较小规模系统中工作得很好,但对于数千个客户机访问由分布在数千个磁盘上的数千个对象组成的单个文件的大型系统来说,它就失败了。我们正在构建的文件系统Ceph将文件分布到许多对象和磁盘上,以分配负载并提高可靠性。在这样的系统中,元数据服务器集群有时会在几秒钟内看到数千个对同一文件的打开请求。为了解决这一瓶颈,我们为基于对象的存储系统提出了新的身份验证协议,其中固定大小的对象序列包含文件和闪存群。我们定性地评估了每个协议的安全性和风险,并使用科学应用程序的痕迹,比较了每个协议的开销。我们发现,令人惊讶的是,使用公钥加密的协议在提供比仅使用对称密钥加密的协议更高的安全性的同时,几乎不会产生额外的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Secure data deduplication Improving secure long-term archival of digitally signed documents Efficient integrity checking of untrusted network storage Testable commitments When cryptography meets storage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1