Investigating the Relationship Between Management Style and Market Orientation in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences

B. Ahadinezhad, Omid Khosravizadeh, F. Vahdati, M. Mohammadkhani, Rana Soheylirad, Sogol Sarikhani
{"title":"Investigating the Relationship Between Management Style and Market Orientation in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences","authors":"B. Ahadinezhad, Omid Khosravizadeh, F. Vahdati, M. Mohammadkhani, Rana Soheylirad, Sogol Sarikhani","doi":"10.18502/jebhpme.v6i2.9944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hospital management style can affect various aspects of hospital performance. One of these aspects is the level of market orientation of the hospital. Therefore, the present study attempts to answer whether management style makes a difference in the degree market orientation of hospitals or not. \nMethods: This research is a descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2020. About 420 people were selected by stratified sampling out of the six medical centers' staff in Qazvin, Iran. A total of 411 people (97.86 %) completed the questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using STATA15 and SPSS16 software. Robust regression analysis was used to estimate the role of management style in the level of market orientation of hospitals. Mean variables were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc test. \nResults: The score range of the variables was from 1 to 5. Autocratic and delegating styles obtained the highest average (3.22 ± 0.54) and the lowest average (2.87 ± 0.70), respectively. Among the dimensions of market orientation, customer orientation had the highest average (3.32 ± 0.84), while competitor orientation obtained the lowest average (2.80 ± 0.86). The average score of market orientation was 2.88 ± 0.65. A statistically significant difference between hospitals was observed in terms of participative and delegating styles (P-value < 0.05). In addition to market orientation, there was a statistically significant difference between hospitals (P-value < 0.05). The regression coefficient between the level of the hospital market orientation and the participative and delegating styles was 0.10 and 0.09, respectively (P-value < 0.05). In contrast, the regression coefficient between autocratic style and level of market orientation was estimated to be -0.76. \nConclusion: It can be concluded that managers should use more participatory and delegating styles to increase the market orientation of the studied hospitals.","PeriodicalId":198049,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jebhpme.v6i2.9944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital management style can affect various aspects of hospital performance. One of these aspects is the level of market orientation of the hospital. Therefore, the present study attempts to answer whether management style makes a difference in the degree market orientation of hospitals or not. Methods: This research is a descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2020. About 420 people were selected by stratified sampling out of the six medical centers' staff in Qazvin, Iran. A total of 411 people (97.86 %) completed the questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using STATA15 and SPSS16 software. Robust regression analysis was used to estimate the role of management style in the level of market orientation of hospitals. Mean variables were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc test. Results: The score range of the variables was from 1 to 5. Autocratic and delegating styles obtained the highest average (3.22 ± 0.54) and the lowest average (2.87 ± 0.70), respectively. Among the dimensions of market orientation, customer orientation had the highest average (3.32 ± 0.84), while competitor orientation obtained the lowest average (2.80 ± 0.86). The average score of market orientation was 2.88 ± 0.65. A statistically significant difference between hospitals was observed in terms of participative and delegating styles (P-value < 0.05). In addition to market orientation, there was a statistically significant difference between hospitals (P-value < 0.05). The regression coefficient between the level of the hospital market orientation and the participative and delegating styles was 0.10 and 0.09, respectively (P-value < 0.05). In contrast, the regression coefficient between autocratic style and level of market orientation was estimated to be -0.76. Conclusion: It can be concluded that managers should use more participatory and delegating styles to increase the market orientation of the studied hospitals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡兹温医科大学管理方式与市场导向的关系研究
背景:医院管理风格可以影响医院绩效的各个方面。其中一个方面是医院的市场导向水平。因此,本研究试图回答管理风格是否会对医院的程度市场导向产生影响。方法:本研究采用描述性分析和横断面研究,于2020年进行。通过分层抽样,从伊朗加兹温6个医疗中心的工作人员中选出约420人。共411人(97.86%)完成问卷调查。采用STATA15和SPSS16软件对采集的数据进行分析。采用稳健回归分析估计管理方式对医院市场导向水平的影响。采用单因素方差分析和事后检验对平均变量进行分析。结果:各变量得分范围为1 ~ 5分。专制风格和委托风格的平均得分最高(3.22±0.54),最低(2.87±0.70)。在市场导向的各维度中,顾客导向的平均值最高(3.32±0.84),竞争者导向的平均值最低(2.80±0.86)。市场导向的平均得分为2.88±0.65。医院间参与式和委托式的差异有统计学意义(p值< 0.05)。除市场导向外,医院间差异有统计学意义(p值< 0.05)。医院市场导向水平与参与式和委托式的回归系数分别为0.10和0.09 (p值< 0.05)。专制风格与市场导向程度的回归系数估计为-0.76。结论:管理者应采取更多的参与式和委托式管理方式,增强医院的市场导向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring and Comparing Service Delivery Time in Government and Outsourced Health Posts Affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Virtual Reality Interventions on Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review Institutional Ownership and Concentration of Capital in Pharmaceutical Companies: Evidence from Iran Factors Affecting the Resilience of Nurses in the COVID-19 Crisis: A Mixed Method Study from West of Iran Disaster Mitigation and preparedness from the Perspective of Holy Quran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1