A Contextual Ranking and Selection Method for Personalized Medicine

Jianzhong Du, Siyang Gao, C.-H. Chen
{"title":"A Contextual Ranking and Selection Method for Personalized Medicine","authors":"Jianzhong Du, Siyang Gao, C.-H. Chen","doi":"10.1287/msom.2022.0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Personalized medicine (PM) seeks the best treatment for each patient among a set of available treatment methods. Because a specific treatment does not work well on all patients, traditionally, the best treatment was selected based on the doctor’s personal experience and expertise, which is subject to human errors. In the meantime, stochastic models have been well developed in the literature for a lot of major diseases. This gives rise to a simulation-based solution for PM, which uses the simulation tool to evaluate the performance for pairs of treatment and patient biometric characteristics and, based on that, selects the best treatment for each patient characteristic. Methodology/results: In this research, we extend the ranking and selection (R&S) model in simulation-based decision making to solving PM. The biometric characteristics of a patient are treated as a context for R&S, and we call it contextual ranking and selection (CR&S). We consider two formulations of CR&S with small and large context spaces, respectively, and develop new techniques for solving them and identifying the rate-optimal budget allocation rules. Based on them, two selection algorithms are proposed, which can be shown to be numerically superior via a set of tests on abstract and real-world examples. Managerial implications: This research provides a systematic way of conducting simulation-based decision-making for PM. To improve the overall decision quality for the possible contexts, more simulation efforts should be devoted to contexts in which it is difficult to distinguish between the best treatment and non-best treatments, and our results quantify the optimal trade-off of the simulation efforts between the pairs of contexts and treatments. Funding: J. Du is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72091211]. C.-H. Chen is partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Awards FAIN212368. Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0232 .","PeriodicalId":119284,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem definition: Personalized medicine (PM) seeks the best treatment for each patient among a set of available treatment methods. Because a specific treatment does not work well on all patients, traditionally, the best treatment was selected based on the doctor’s personal experience and expertise, which is subject to human errors. In the meantime, stochastic models have been well developed in the literature for a lot of major diseases. This gives rise to a simulation-based solution for PM, which uses the simulation tool to evaluate the performance for pairs of treatment and patient biometric characteristics and, based on that, selects the best treatment for each patient characteristic. Methodology/results: In this research, we extend the ranking and selection (R&S) model in simulation-based decision making to solving PM. The biometric characteristics of a patient are treated as a context for R&S, and we call it contextual ranking and selection (CR&S). We consider two formulations of CR&S with small and large context spaces, respectively, and develop new techniques for solving them and identifying the rate-optimal budget allocation rules. Based on them, two selection algorithms are proposed, which can be shown to be numerically superior via a set of tests on abstract and real-world examples. Managerial implications: This research provides a systematic way of conducting simulation-based decision-making for PM. To improve the overall decision quality for the possible contexts, more simulation efforts should be devoted to contexts in which it is difficult to distinguish between the best treatment and non-best treatments, and our results quantify the optimal trade-off of the simulation efforts between the pairs of contexts and treatments. Funding: J. Du is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72091211]. C.-H. Chen is partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Awards FAIN212368. Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0232 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个性化医疗的情境排序与选择方法
问题定义:个性化医疗(PM)在一组可用的治疗方法中为每位患者寻求最佳治疗。由于一种特定的治疗方法并不是对所有的病人都有效,传统上,最好的治疗方法是根据医生的个人经验和专业知识来选择的,这容易受到人为错误的影响。与此同时,许多重大疾病的随机模型已经在文献中得到了很好的发展。这就产生了基于模拟的PM解决方案,该解决方案使用模拟工具来评估治疗和患者生物特征对的性能,并在此基础上为每个患者特征选择最佳治疗。方法/结果:在本研究中,我们将基于仿真的决策中的排名和选择(R&S)模型扩展到解决项目管理问题。患者的生物特征被视为R&S的上下文,我们称之为上下文排序和选择(CR&S)。我们分别考虑了小语境空间和大语境空间下的两种CR&S公式,并开发了求解它们的新技术和确定速率最优预算分配规则的新技术。在此基础上,提出了两种选择算法,通过对抽象和实际实例的测试,证明了两种算法在数值上的优越性。管理意义:本研究为项目管理提供了一种系统的方法来进行基于模拟的决策。为了提高可能情境的整体决策质量,更多的模拟工作应该投入到难以区分最佳治疗和非最佳治疗的情境中,我们的结果量化了情境和治疗对之间模拟工作的最佳权衡。基金资助:杜杰获国家自然科学基金资助[no . 72091211]部分资助。学术界。国家自然科学基金项目:FAIN212368。补充材料:电子伴侣可在https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0232上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physician Adoption of AI Assistant Disclosing Delivery Performance Information When Consumers Are Sensitive to Promised Delivery Time, Delivery Reliability, and Price Loyalty Currency and Mental Accounting: Do Consumers Treat Points Like Money? Dealership or Marketplace with Fulfillment Services: A Dynamic Comparison Introduction: Frontiers in Operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1