Residents’ and farmers’ perspectives on risks and benefits of intensive livestock farming

V. Eijrond, L. Claassen, D. Timmermans
{"title":"Residents’ and farmers’ perspectives on risks and benefits of intensive livestock farming","authors":"V. Eijrond, L. Claassen, D. Timmermans","doi":"10.1080/27685241.2022.2089601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Currently, there is a societal debate in the Netherlands about the future of intensive livestock farming and the current risks for human health and the environment. These risks could be described as systemic risks, which call for a deliberative approach to risk governance, including risk communication. However, stakeholders often have different perspectives towards intensive livestock farming and related risks which pose a challenge for communication. To support two-way communication, it is essential to identify the perspectives of residents and farmers who are directly affected by livestock farming. Using the mental models approach, we explored the current perspectives of the risks and benefits towards intensive livestock farming, in particular, on human health. Interviews were held with in total 44 farmers, residents and other stakeholders. We found that residents tend to view intensive livestock farming from the perspective of the quality of the living environment, which may clarify their overall focus on the risks to their well-being, whereas farmers tend to view intensive livestock farming from the perspective of their livelihood, which explains their focus on the (economic) benefits of intensive livestock farming. For experts as well as policy-makers, it is important to acknowledge the differences in risk perception when giving information about epidemiological health risks and communicating about policy measures.","PeriodicalId":211218,"journal":{"name":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2022.2089601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Currently, there is a societal debate in the Netherlands about the future of intensive livestock farming and the current risks for human health and the environment. These risks could be described as systemic risks, which call for a deliberative approach to risk governance, including risk communication. However, stakeholders often have different perspectives towards intensive livestock farming and related risks which pose a challenge for communication. To support two-way communication, it is essential to identify the perspectives of residents and farmers who are directly affected by livestock farming. Using the mental models approach, we explored the current perspectives of the risks and benefits towards intensive livestock farming, in particular, on human health. Interviews were held with in total 44 farmers, residents and other stakeholders. We found that residents tend to view intensive livestock farming from the perspective of the quality of the living environment, which may clarify their overall focus on the risks to their well-being, whereas farmers tend to view intensive livestock farming from the perspective of their livelihood, which explains their focus on the (economic) benefits of intensive livestock farming. For experts as well as policy-makers, it is important to acknowledge the differences in risk perception when giving information about epidemiological health risks and communicating about policy measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居民和农民对集约化畜牧业风险和收益的看法
目前,在荷兰,关于集约化畜牧业的未来以及当前对人类健康和环境的风险,存在着一场社会辩论。这些风险可以被描述为系统性风险,需要审慎的风险治理方法,包括风险沟通。然而,利益相关者往往对集约化畜牧业和相关风险有不同的看法,这对沟通构成了挑战。为了支持双向沟通,必须确定直接受畜牧业影响的居民和农民的观点。使用心理模型方法,我们探索了目前对集约化畜牧业的风险和利益的看法,特别是对人类健康的看法。共采访了44位农民、居民和其他利益相关者。我们发现,居民倾向于从生活环境质量的角度来看待集约化畜牧业,这可能澄清了他们对其福祉风险的总体关注,而农民倾向于从生计的角度来看待集约化畜牧业,这解释了他们关注集约化畜牧业的(经济)效益。对于专家和决策者来说,在提供有关流行病学健康风险的信息和就政策措施进行沟通时,重要的是要承认风险认知的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatially scaled and customised daily light integral maps for horticulture lighting design From fix to fitting: Connecting low-emission development with multilevel smallholder dairy practices in Kenya Risk coping strategies of typical and entrepreneurial smallholder dairy farmers in Ethiopia Facets of value emerging through the operation of short food supply chains From experiment to market development: A case study of prospects and value chain of saline agriculture in Terschelling, the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1