Learning Strategies and Motivation in Online Education: A Survey on The Undergraduate Physical Therapy Students

{"title":"Learning Strategies and Motivation in Online Education: A Survey on The Undergraduate Physical Therapy Students","authors":"","doi":"10.56536/sjptr.v1i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Student motivation is an important determinant of academic performance. Teachers can employ a variety of extrinsic motivators in the usual physical classrooms. However, they have fewer opportunities to keep the students motivated in a virtual learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intrinsic motivation is a key factor to ensure good academic performance in online education. \nObjective: To determine the Student motivation and learning strategies in online education among undergraduate physical therapy students. \nMethods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on undergraduate physical therapy students from institutes of Islamabad/Rawalpindi. A sample of 305 students was selected using convenience sampling technique. Learning strategies and student motivation were determined using the 44-item Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MLSQ). \nResults: The mean scores for motivation subscales i.e. self-efficacy, Intrinsic value, and test anxiety were 34.65±11.4, 39.83±12.13, and 17.93±5.81 respectively. For the subscales of learning strategies, the average values were 62.28±17.04 and 40.88±10.85 for cognitive strategy use and self-regulation respectively. Statistically significant differences (p-value<0.05) were observed between the motivation level of males and females with males having a higher mean value as compared to females. The Differences in learning strategies were statistically not significant (p-value>0.05) between males and females. \nConclusion: Undergraduate physical therapy students show average levels of self-efficacy and intrinsic values in online learning and high levels of test anxiety. Cognitive strategy use and selfregulation were also reported to be high with online learning. Males show higher motivation levels in online education as compared to female undergraduate physical therapy students","PeriodicalId":177662,"journal":{"name":"The Superior Journal of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Superior Journal of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56536/sjptr.v1i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Student motivation is an important determinant of academic performance. Teachers can employ a variety of extrinsic motivators in the usual physical classrooms. However, they have fewer opportunities to keep the students motivated in a virtual learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intrinsic motivation is a key factor to ensure good academic performance in online education. Objective: To determine the Student motivation and learning strategies in online education among undergraduate physical therapy students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on undergraduate physical therapy students from institutes of Islamabad/Rawalpindi. A sample of 305 students was selected using convenience sampling technique. Learning strategies and student motivation were determined using the 44-item Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MLSQ). Results: The mean scores for motivation subscales i.e. self-efficacy, Intrinsic value, and test anxiety were 34.65±11.4, 39.83±12.13, and 17.93±5.81 respectively. For the subscales of learning strategies, the average values were 62.28±17.04 and 40.88±10.85 for cognitive strategy use and self-regulation respectively. Statistically significant differences (p-value<0.05) were observed between the motivation level of males and females with males having a higher mean value as compared to females. The Differences in learning strategies were statistically not significant (p-value>0.05) between males and females. Conclusion: Undergraduate physical therapy students show average levels of self-efficacy and intrinsic values in online learning and high levels of test anxiety. Cognitive strategy use and selfregulation were also reported to be high with online learning. Males show higher motivation levels in online education as compared to female undergraduate physical therapy students
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线教育中的学习策略和动机:物理治疗本科生调查
背景:学生动机是学业成绩的重要决定因素。教师可以在通常的物理教室中使用各种外在激励因素。然而,在COVID-19大流行期间,他们很少有机会在虚拟学习环境中保持学生的积极性。在网络教育中,内在动机是保证良好学习成绩的关键因素。目的:了解本科物理治疗专业学生在线学习的动机和学习策略。方法:对伊斯兰堡/拉瓦尔品第院校物理治疗专业本科学生进行横断面调查。采用方便抽样法抽取305名学生。采用44项学习动机策略问卷(MLSQ)对学习策略和学生动机进行了研究。结果:学生自我效能感、内在价值和考试焦虑的平均得分分别为34.65±11.4分、39.83±12.13分和17.93±5.81分。在学习策略的子量表中,认知策略使用和自我调节的平均值分别为62.28±17.04和40.88±10.85。男女差异有统计学意义(p值0.05)。结论:物理治疗专业本科学生在线学习自我效能感和内在价值处于中等水平,考试焦虑水平较高。据报道,在线学习的认知策略使用和自我调节能力也很高。与物理治疗专业的女生相比,男生在网络教育中表现出更高的动机水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RASCON: Future of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences in Pakistan Association Among Body Mass Index, Q-angle and Flat Foot in Students of University of Lahore Knowledge and Experiences of Pregnant Females Towards Physiotherapy in Lahore Mobility related confidence level in chronic stroke patients through task oriented walking intervention Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Versus Electrotherapy in Patients with Neck Pain Due to Poor Posture –A non-randomized trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1