Environmental and Health Challenges in Battery Recycling in Bulgaria

Nikolai Vitkov
{"title":"Environmental and Health Challenges in Battery Recycling in Bulgaria","authors":"Nikolai Vitkov","doi":"10.1109/BulEF56479.2022.10021161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this report is to investigate and compare the environmental and health risks of the selection of chemistry for electrical energy storage in Bulgaria at the end-of-life stage of the batteries and the inevitable decommissioning that must be followed by safe transportation and recycling. According to National Plan for Recovery and Sustainability of the Republic of Bulgaria, version 1.5 of 06.04.2022 [1], is expected to be generated large quantities of hazardous waste from electric batteries in the not too distant future. The choice of battery chemistry is determinant for the recycling procedures of these wastes. Two battery chemistries considered most promising for stationary electrical energy storage - Lead Acid (LA) and Lithium-ion-Iron (Ferrous) -Phosphate (LFP). Lead-acid chemistry is well developed in the western world, including Bulgaria, and would be a logical choice, but is many times less efficient than lithium chemistry, which can only be imported from the major producers in the East. The recycling of the waste from the two chemistries is fundamentally different - the lead chemistry can be recycled in Bulgaria in compliance with environmental and health standards or in neighboring European countries, while the lithium is likely to be recycled where it is produced (if there will obtain technological breakt$h$roug$h$) - in a country in the Far East with the corresponding transport and processing costs to be budgeted in the financial assessment of the projects. Unless a technological breakthrough occurs, there remains disposal of LFPs batteries with a high risk of large-scale explosions and fires at disposal sites with the risk of harm to people and severe environmental consequences.","PeriodicalId":375606,"journal":{"name":"2022 14th Electrical Engineering Faculty Conference (BulEF)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 14th Electrical Engineering Faculty Conference (BulEF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BulEF56479.2022.10021161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to investigate and compare the environmental and health risks of the selection of chemistry for electrical energy storage in Bulgaria at the end-of-life stage of the batteries and the inevitable decommissioning that must be followed by safe transportation and recycling. According to National Plan for Recovery and Sustainability of the Republic of Bulgaria, version 1.5 of 06.04.2022 [1], is expected to be generated large quantities of hazardous waste from electric batteries in the not too distant future. The choice of battery chemistry is determinant for the recycling procedures of these wastes. Two battery chemistries considered most promising for stationary electrical energy storage - Lead Acid (LA) and Lithium-ion-Iron (Ferrous) -Phosphate (LFP). Lead-acid chemistry is well developed in the western world, including Bulgaria, and would be a logical choice, but is many times less efficient than lithium chemistry, which can only be imported from the major producers in the East. The recycling of the waste from the two chemistries is fundamentally different - the lead chemistry can be recycled in Bulgaria in compliance with environmental and health standards or in neighboring European countries, while the lithium is likely to be recycled where it is produced (if there will obtain technological breakt$h$roug$h$) - in a country in the Far East with the corresponding transport and processing costs to be budgeted in the financial assessment of the projects. Unless a technological breakthrough occurs, there remains disposal of LFPs batteries with a high risk of large-scale explosions and fires at disposal sites with the risk of harm to people and severe environmental consequences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保加利亚电池回收中的环境和健康挑战
本报告的目的是调查和比较保加利亚在电池寿命结束阶段选择用于电能储存的化学物质所带来的环境和健康风险,以及必须在安全运输和回收之后进行的不可避免的退役。根据保加利亚共和国国家回收和可持续性计划,2022年6月4日1.5版[1],预计在不久的将来,电池将产生大量危险废物。电池化学成分的选择决定了这些废物的回收程序。两种被认为最有希望用于固定电能存储的电池化学物质-铅酸(LA)和锂离子-铁(亚铁)-磷酸(LFP)。铅酸化学在包括保加利亚在内的西方世界发展得很好,是一个合乎逻辑的选择,但其效率比锂化学低很多倍,锂化学只能从东方的主要生产商那里进口。从这两种化学物质中回收废物的方式根本不同——铅化学物质可以按照环境和健康标准在保加利亚或在邻近的欧洲国家进行回收,而锂则可能在其生产地(如果有技术突破的话)——在远东国家进行回收,相应的运输和处理费用将在项目的财务评估中列入预算。除非出现技术突破,否则lfp电池的处置仍有可能在处置地点发生大规模爆炸和火灾,有可能对人员造成伤害并造成严重的环境后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RESEARCH OF THE FORCE EFFECT ON THE ROTOR WEDGES IN SYNCHRONOUS GENERATORS Results of simulation modeling of an insulation system with the development of a partial discharge in the volume of a solid dielectric Research of Station Passenger Security Systems in Rail Transport Analysis of the Possibilities for the Utilization of Photovoltaic Energy and the Use of a Hydrogen Installation for Energy Storage in Buildings Energy Consumption Monitoring of FPGA Controller
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1