A Corpus-Based Analysis of although Errors in Chinese EFL Learners’ Written Output

Jingwen Chen
{"title":"A Corpus-Based Analysis of although Errors in Chinese EFL Learners’ Written Output","authors":"Jingwen Chen","doi":"10.22158/SELT.V5N3P429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subordinating conjunction although is frequently used in English and is considered easy for students to master by many Chinese English teachers. However, errors are often found in Chinese EFL learners although output during pedagogical practice. This paper aims to explore and analyze common errors of although in Chinese EFL learners writing. The study is a corpus-based analysis launched under the computer-aided error analysis framework which is a new practice developed from the error analysis hypothesis. Errors of although found in texts from the Chinese Learner English Corpus (CLEC) are extracted and analyzed. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted in the study. According to the findings, there are four major types of although errors found in Chinese EFL learners writing but/yet addition, punctuation errors, although misuse, and omissions and blends. Factors such as interlingual difference between English and Mandarin Chinese, intralingual interference within the English language system, pedagogical neglect in English classrooms and different cognitive styles are potential causes of Chinese EFL learners although errors.","PeriodicalId":112359,"journal":{"name":"Studies in English Language and Teaching","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in English Language and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/SELT.V5N3P429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The subordinating conjunction although is frequently used in English and is considered easy for students to master by many Chinese English teachers. However, errors are often found in Chinese EFL learners although output during pedagogical practice. This paper aims to explore and analyze common errors of although in Chinese EFL learners writing. The study is a corpus-based analysis launched under the computer-aided error analysis framework which is a new practice developed from the error analysis hypothesis. Errors of although found in texts from the Chinese Learner English Corpus (CLEC) are extracted and analyzed. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted in the study. According to the findings, there are four major types of although errors found in Chinese EFL learners writing but/yet addition, punctuation errors, although misuse, and omissions and blends. Factors such as interlingual difference between English and Mandarin Chinese, intralingual interference within the English language system, pedagogical neglect in English classrooms and different cognitive styles are potential causes of Chinese EFL learners although errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于语料库的中国英语学习者书面输出中的虽错分析
从属连词虽然在英语中经常使用,但许多中国英语教师认为学生很容易掌握。然而,在教学实践中,中国的英语学习者虽然有输出,但也经常出现错误。本文旨在探讨和分析中国英语学习者写作中常见的“虽然”错误。本研究是在计算机辅助误差分析框架下展开的基于语料库的分析,是在误差分析假说的基础上发展起来的一种新的实践。对《中国学习英语语料库》文本中出现的“虽然”错误进行了提取和分析。在研究中进行了定性和定量分析。根据研究结果,中国英语学习者在写作中出现的“虽然”错误主要有四种类型:加法错误、标点错误、“虽然”误用、省略和混合。英语和普通话的语际差异、英语语言系统内的语内干扰、英语课堂上的教学忽视以及不同的认知风格等因素都是中国英语学习者产生错误的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
L2 Expository Text Reading Instruction: A Graphic Organiser-Based Methodology Digital Technology in University Language Courses: Project Letras 2.0 at UFRJ The Relationship of Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presence with Course Satisfaction in a TESL Programme Course in a Public University in Sabah, East Malaysia Partnership with Librarians: A Strategy to Improve Secondary School Students’ English Literacy Investigation into the Negative Factors in English Vocabulary Acquisition of College Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1