Management of Achilles tendon injuries: Current trends

O. Awe, E. Esezobor, John Enekele Oniminya
{"title":"Management of Achilles tendon injuries: Current trends","authors":"O. Awe, E. Esezobor, John Enekele Oniminya","doi":"10.4103/0794-9316.178455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Achilles tendon injuries have been on the increase worldwide, especially in the last two decades. The classification of the injury has not been explicit and the management protocols are confusing, especially with respect to specific injuries. There is a need to have a look at the current trends in the management of this common injury in order to create awareness and stimulate the need for standardization of the treatment protocols, possibly reaching a consensus. Materials and Methods: Information on the types of the injury, classification, and treatment modalities were obtained by searching the Pubmed, Medknow, Google Scholar, and other publications. These were collated and analyzed. Results: In most of the information on Achilles tendon injuries, these were inappropriately equated with Achilles tendon ruptures, which are actually supposed to be a subset. In the same vein, the diverse treatment options available were mainly those extensively used in ruptures. These procedures range from open surgery and minimal access surgery to close or conservative management followed closely with physiotherapy. Conclusion: There is a subtle misconception in the literature that we reviewed where Achilles tendon injuries were considered the same as Achilles tendon ruptures but this is not so. There are other injuries with different pathomechanisms and therefore, different managements. There is a need to include these other injuries and also broaden the management options. Minimal access surgery is preferred in ruptures.","PeriodicalId":325435,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0794-9316.178455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achilles tendon injuries have been on the increase worldwide, especially in the last two decades. The classification of the injury has not been explicit and the management protocols are confusing, especially with respect to specific injuries. There is a need to have a look at the current trends in the management of this common injury in order to create awareness and stimulate the need for standardization of the treatment protocols, possibly reaching a consensus. Materials and Methods: Information on the types of the injury, classification, and treatment modalities were obtained by searching the Pubmed, Medknow, Google Scholar, and other publications. These were collated and analyzed. Results: In most of the information on Achilles tendon injuries, these were inappropriately equated with Achilles tendon ruptures, which are actually supposed to be a subset. In the same vein, the diverse treatment options available were mainly those extensively used in ruptures. These procedures range from open surgery and minimal access surgery to close or conservative management followed closely with physiotherapy. Conclusion: There is a subtle misconception in the literature that we reviewed where Achilles tendon injuries were considered the same as Achilles tendon ruptures but this is not so. There are other injuries with different pathomechanisms and therefore, different managements. There is a need to include these other injuries and also broaden the management options. Minimal access surgery is preferred in ruptures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跟腱损伤的处理:当前趋势
引言:跟腱损伤在世界范围内呈上升趋势,尤其是在最近二十年。损伤的分类一直不明确,管理方案也很混乱,特别是在特定损伤方面。有必要了解这种常见损伤管理的当前趋势,以提高认识,促进治疗方案标准化的必要性,并可能达成共识。材料和方法:通过检索Pubmed、Medknow、谷歌Scholar等出版物获得损伤类型、分类和治疗方式的信息。对这些数据进行了整理和分析。结果:在大多数关于跟腱损伤的信息中,这些被不恰当地等同于跟腱断裂,这实际上应该是一个子集。同样,现有的多种治疗方案主要是那些广泛用于破裂的治疗方案。这些程序范围从开放手术和最小通道手术到封闭或保守管理,并密切配合物理治疗。结论:在我们回顾的文献中有一个微妙的误解,即跟腱损伤被认为与跟腱断裂相同,但事实并非如此。还有其他不同病理机制的损伤,因此需要不同的治疗方法。有必要将其他伤病也包括在内,并扩大管理选择。微创手术是治疗破裂的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of aplasia cutis type VI (Bart’s syndrome) at University of Abuja Teaching Hospital Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria A prospective randomized comparative study of facial scar modulation using topical silicone gel versus coconut oil Tessier 4 right-sided orofacial cleft deformity with associated congenital limb anomalies − a case report and literature review Penile and scrotal defects post-Fournier gangrene: reconstructive options and challenges in resource limited settings Ectrodactyly or lobster claw feet: our surgical experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1