Micromorfología superficial de 2 cerámicas grabables tratadas con diferentes ácidos

Ximena Zamorano Pino, Vladimir Valenzuela Aránguiz, Valentina Peña Juliá, Camila Saul Pino
{"title":"Micromorfología superficial de 2 cerámicas grabables tratadas con diferentes ácidos","authors":"Ximena Zamorano Pino,&nbsp;Vladimir Valenzuela Aránguiz,&nbsp;Valentina Peña Juliá,&nbsp;Camila Saul Pino","doi":"10.1016/j.piro.2015.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Surface conditioning prior to cementing is indicated to achieve a strong bond between metal-free ceramic restorations and resin cements. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surfaces of Feldspathic ceramic and Lithium disilicate glass ceramic before and after being treated with two acid procedures. For this, 8 blocks of Feldspathic ceramic (A) and 8 of Ceramic lithium disilicate (B) were used. They were subdivided into two groups of 4 blocks (A1 and A2) and (B1 and B2). Groups A1 and B1 were treated with 9% Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) and the A2 and B2 groups, with 9% Hydrofluoric Acid followed by 35% Phosphoric Acid. Subsequently, they were observed using SEM (1,000<!--> <!-->×) and the images processed with the program Matlab R2012a, which measures the contrast. The statistics used were ANOVA test and the unpaired <em>t</em> test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>9% Hydrofluoric Acid creates irregularities in both types of ceramics. When applying HF followed by Phosphoric Acid on Feldspathic ceramics, no differences in contrast were found, compared to using only HF. With ceramic lithium disilicate using both acids, there are fewer irregularities with respect to those treated with a single acid.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>9% Hydrofluoric Acid creates micro-retentions in both ceramics. 9% HF followed by 35% Phosphoric Acid appears to significantly modify the Lithium disilicate glass ceramic contrast values. On the other hand, the Feldspathic ceramic showed no significant differences with both treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21203,"journal":{"name":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2015.09.007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0718539115001019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Surface conditioning prior to cementing is indicated to achieve a strong bond between metal-free ceramic restorations and resin cements. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surfaces of Feldspathic ceramic and Lithium disilicate glass ceramic before and after being treated with two acid procedures. For this, 8 blocks of Feldspathic ceramic (A) and 8 of Ceramic lithium disilicate (B) were used. They were subdivided into two groups of 4 blocks (A1 and A2) and (B1 and B2). Groups A1 and B1 were treated with 9% Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) and the A2 and B2 groups, with 9% Hydrofluoric Acid followed by 35% Phosphoric Acid. Subsequently, they were observed using SEM (1,000 ×) and the images processed with the program Matlab R2012a, which measures the contrast. The statistics used were ANOVA test and the unpaired t test.

Results

9% Hydrofluoric Acid creates irregularities in both types of ceramics. When applying HF followed by Phosphoric Acid on Feldspathic ceramics, no differences in contrast were found, compared to using only HF. With ceramic lithium disilicate using both acids, there are fewer irregularities with respect to those treated with a single acid.

Conclusion

9% Hydrofluoric Acid creates micro-retentions in both ceramics. 9% HF followed by 35% Phosphoric Acid appears to significantly modify the Lithium disilicate glass ceramic contrast values. On the other hand, the Feldspathic ceramic showed no significant differences with both treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶结前的表面调理被认为可以实现无金属陶瓷修复体和树脂胶结体之间的牢固结合。本研究的目的是描述和比较两种酸处理方法前后长石陶瓷和二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷表面的扫描电镜(SEM)图像。为此,使用了8块长石陶瓷(A)和8块陶瓷二硅酸锂(B)。再分为两组,每组4块(A1和A2)和(B1和B2)。A1和B1组用9%氢氟酸(HF)处理,A2和B2组用9%氢氟酸加35%磷酸处理。随后,使用扫描电镜(1000 ×)观察它们,并用Matlab R2012a程序处理图像,测量对比度。统计采用方差分析检验和未配对t检验。结果9%氢氟酸在两种类型的陶瓷中产生不规则性。当在长石陶瓷上使用HF后再使用磷酸时,与仅使用HF相比,对比度没有差异。与使用两种酸的陶瓷二硅酸锂相比,使用单一酸处理的陶瓷二硅酸锂的不规则性更少。结论9%氢氟酸在两种陶瓷中均产生微保留。9% HF加35%磷酸明显改变了二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的对比值。另一方面,长石陶瓷在两种处理下无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flujo salival y caries radicular en adultos mayores autovalentes Necesidad de tratamiento periodontal en adolescentes de 12 años de colegios municipalizados en Valdivia–Chile 2014: estudio transversal Impacto de la hipomineralización incisivo molar en la experiencia de caries en escolares de 6-12 años en Santiago, Chile Repigmentación melánica de la melanosis gingival. Revisión sistemática Marsupialización modificada de ránula gigante intraoral: reporte de caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1