A Comparative Study on Appraisal of Lithological Boundaries and Litho-Models Using Well Log Data at Bhogpara Oil Field in Assam of NE India

{"title":"A Comparative Study on Appraisal of Lithological Boundaries and Litho-Models Using Well Log Data at Bhogpara Oil Field in Assam of NE India","authors":"","doi":"10.23880/ppej-16000335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate assessment of bed boundaries at a drill site is a crucial step for reservoir characterization. Generally, the interpreters in oil industries carry out such analysis through expensive softwares based on their experiences and geological knowledge in the study area. However, identifying bed boundaries using traditional interpretation is tedious. In this study, we adopted a synergistic approach of Walsh transform and a bed boundary demarcation technique to discriminate the lithological boundaries in Bhogpara oil field of Assam in NE India. This bed boundary detection technique was tested over self-potential (SP), gamma ray (GR) and laterolog deep resistivity (LLD) logs. Initially, we detected the possible lithological boundaries from GR log variations and hence proposed a lithological model as per the knowledge of traditional log interpretation techniques. Subsequently, Walsh low pass filter was applied to the self-potential (SP), GR and LLD logs to obtain their step function. Afterward, the step functions of logs were processed through the boundary detection algorithm to find out the possible thick and thin beds. Further, bed correlation was made among the Walsh-detected boundaries for the studied wells of the Bhogpara oil field. Finally, a bed boundary model was generated using the boundaries picked from the Walsh-based approach. Our analysis exhibit that the model generated from Walsh boundaries more explicitly envisaged the possible heterogeneity. Traditionally we discriminated the minimum bed thickness of the order of 5.15 m, whereas, from the Walsh-based approach we obtained thin bed of the order of 3.2 m. This proposed bed boundary assessment technique is also helpful in understanding the position of subsurface rock layers as well as possible thick and thin beds when we don’t have any pre-received core information.","PeriodicalId":282073,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment of bed boundaries at a drill site is a crucial step for reservoir characterization. Generally, the interpreters in oil industries carry out such analysis through expensive softwares based on their experiences and geological knowledge in the study area. However, identifying bed boundaries using traditional interpretation is tedious. In this study, we adopted a synergistic approach of Walsh transform and a bed boundary demarcation technique to discriminate the lithological boundaries in Bhogpara oil field of Assam in NE India. This bed boundary detection technique was tested over self-potential (SP), gamma ray (GR) and laterolog deep resistivity (LLD) logs. Initially, we detected the possible lithological boundaries from GR log variations and hence proposed a lithological model as per the knowledge of traditional log interpretation techniques. Subsequently, Walsh low pass filter was applied to the self-potential (SP), GR and LLD logs to obtain their step function. Afterward, the step functions of logs were processed through the boundary detection algorithm to find out the possible thick and thin beds. Further, bed correlation was made among the Walsh-detected boundaries for the studied wells of the Bhogpara oil field. Finally, a bed boundary model was generated using the boundaries picked from the Walsh-based approach. Our analysis exhibit that the model generated from Walsh boundaries more explicitly envisaged the possible heterogeneity. Traditionally we discriminated the minimum bed thickness of the order of 5.15 m, whereas, from the Walsh-based approach we obtained thin bed of the order of 3.2 m. This proposed bed boundary assessment technique is also helpful in understanding the position of subsurface rock layers as well as possible thick and thin beds when we don’t have any pre-received core information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用测井资料评价印度东北部阿萨姆邦博格帕拉油田岩性边界与岩性模型的对比研究
准确评估钻井现场的地层边界是油藏表征的关键步骤。一般来说,石油行业的解释人员根据他们在研究区域的经验和地质知识,通过昂贵的软件进行这种分析。然而,使用传统的解释来确定地层边界是很繁琐的。在这项研究中,我们采用了Walsh变换和层界划分技术的协同方法来识别印度东北部阿萨姆邦Bhogpara油田的岩性边界。通过自电位测井(SP)、伽马测井(GR)和侧向深电阻率测井(LLD)对该床层边界探测技术进行了测试。首先,我们从GR测井变化中发现了可能的岩性边界,并根据传统测井解释技术的知识提出了岩性模型。随后,对自电位(SP)、GR和LLD日志进行Walsh低通滤波,得到它们的阶跃函数。然后,通过边界检测算法对原木的阶跃函数进行处理,找出可能的厚层和薄层。此外,对Bhogpara油田研究井的沃尔什探测边界进行了层位对比。最后,利用基于walsh的方法提取的边界生成层界模型。我们的分析表明,由沃尔什边界生成的模型更明确地设想了可能的异质性。传统方法判别最小层厚约为5.15 m,而基于walsh的方法得到的薄层厚度约为3.2 m。当我们没有任何预先接收到的岩心信息时,所提出的床层边界评价技术也有助于了解地下岩层的位置以及可能的厚层和薄层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Absorption of Crude Oil from Water Surface Using Shells of Periwinkle, Thales (Ngolo) and Oyster Exploitation and Development of Oil/Gas Marginal Fields in Nigeria and Romania: Technology, Rising Market Development Challenges & Sustainable Energy Transition Development of a New Correlation for Predicting Initial Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoirs Review of the Technical and Economic Evaluation of the Use of Means of Simultaneous Independent Operation for Solving Technical Problems Advancing Reservoir Performance Optimization through UserFriendly Excel VBA Software Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1