Early neurological deterioration as a predictor of outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

H. Kobeissi, S. Ghozy, Trey Seymour, C. Bilgin, R. Kadirvel, D. Kallmes
{"title":"Early neurological deterioration as a predictor of outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"H. Kobeissi, S. Ghozy, Trey Seymour, C. Bilgin, R. Kadirvel, D. Kallmes","doi":"10.1177/15910199221135289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nEarly neurological deterioration (END) is a potential predictor for 90-day outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand whether END can be used as a surrogate for long-term outcomes.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase. END definition was cataloged for each included study. Outcomes of interest included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all definitions of END.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe included seven studies with 2992 patients in our analysis. There was a significant, inverse association with END and mRS 0-2 rates (OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.08-0.29; P-value< 0.001). Moreover, END was a significant predictor of increased odds for reported sICH rates (OR = 16.37; 95% CI = 7.66-34.99; P-value< 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant association between END and increase in mortality rates (OR = 6.79; 95% CI = 2.62-17.62; P-value< 0.001). There was no significant association between END and rates of TICI 2b-3 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.27-1.05; p = 0.069).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBroadly defined, END holds value as a potential predictor of rates of mRS 0-2 at 90 days and is associated with higher rates of mortality and sICH, but had no correlation with TICI 2b-3.","PeriodicalId":126264,"journal":{"name":"Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221135289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Early neurological deterioration (END) is a potential predictor for 90-day outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand whether END can be used as a surrogate for long-term outcomes. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase. END definition was cataloged for each included study. Outcomes of interest included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all definitions of END. RESULTS We included seven studies with 2992 patients in our analysis. There was a significant, inverse association with END and mRS 0-2 rates (OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.08-0.29; P-value< 0.001). Moreover, END was a significant predictor of increased odds for reported sICH rates (OR = 16.37; 95% CI = 7.66-34.99; P-value< 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant association between END and increase in mortality rates (OR = 6.79; 95% CI = 2.62-17.62; P-value< 0.001). There was no significant association between END and rates of TICI 2b-3 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.27-1.05; p = 0.069). CONCLUSIONS Broadly defined, END holds value as a potential predictor of rates of mRS 0-2 at 90 days and is associated with higher rates of mortality and sICH, but had no correlation with TICI 2b-3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期神经系统恶化作为脑卒中血管内血栓切除术后预后的预测因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:严重的神经功能恶化(END)是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)机械取栓后90天预后的潜在预测指标。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以更好地了解END是否可以作为长期预后的替代指标。方法遵循PRISMA指南,使用PubMed、MEDLINE和Embase对英文文献进行系统的文献综述。每个纳入的研究都对END定义进行了编目。研究结果包括90天改良Rankin量表(mRS) 0-2、症状性颅内出血(sICH)、死亡率和脑梗死(TICI)溶栓(2b-3)。我们计算了所有END定义的合并优势比(or)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:我们纳入了7项研究,共2992例患者。与END和mRS 0-2率呈显著负相关(OR = 0.15;95% ci = 0.08-0.29;假定值< 0.001)。此外,END是报告的脑出血发生率增加的显著预测因子(OR = 16.37;95% ci = 7.66-34.99;假定值< 0.001)。此外,END与死亡率增加之间存在显著关联(OR = 6.79;95% ci = 2.62-17.62;假定值< 0.001)。END与TICI 2b-3发生率无显著相关性(OR = 0.53;95% ci = 0.27-1.05;p = 0.069)。从广义上讲,END作为90天mRS 0-2发生率的潜在预测指标具有价值,并且与较高的死亡率和sICH相关,但与TICI 2b-3无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coaxial Method of PTA Balloon and Aspiration catheter using the delivery wire of a stent retriever for tandem occlusion: CoMBAt tandem occlusion. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke of large-vessel occlusion beyond the time window based on imaging evaluation. FRED X flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Two-center experience and mini-review of the literature. Safety and efficacy of transvenous embolization of cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistula in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. The resolute Onyx in TIA management (ROTIA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1