Gender Differences in Short-Term Multiscale Complexity of the Heart Rate Variability

B. D. Maria, F. Perego, G. Cassetti, V. Bari, B. Cairo, F. Gelpi, Monica Parati, L. Vecchia, A. Porta
{"title":"Gender Differences in Short-Term Multiscale Complexity of the Heart Rate Variability","authors":"B. D. Maria, F. Perego, G. Cassetti, V. Bari, B. Cairo, F. Gelpi, Monica Parati, L. Vecchia, A. Porta","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the analytical methods estimating the complexity of the heart period (HP), the linear model-based multiscale complexity (MSC) approach allows the estimation of the complexity over time scales linked to the cardiac autonomic control, i.e. in the low frequency (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz) and high frequency $(HF,\\ 0.15-0.4\\ Hz)$ bands. In this study we exploited MSC to evaluate the differences in the HP variability complexity during daytime (DAY) and nighttime (NIGHT) in 23 healthy females (WOMEN, age $36\\pm 6yrs)$ ) and 21 males (MEN, age $35\\pm 5yrs)$ performing a 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram. Parametric power spectral analysis was applied as well for comparison. Complexity indexes were computed regardless of the temporal scale (CI) and in the LF and HF bands ( $CI_{LF}$ and $CI_{HF}$, respectively). We found that the power spectral indexes did not differentiate WOMEN and MEN, while CI and $CI_{LF}$ were higher in WOMEN during DAY. The higher HP complexity in females could be explained by a lower sympathetic drive and more complex hormonal regulation than males. We conclude that MSC was more powerful than power spectral analysis in detecting gender differences in HP variability. In addition, as cardiac control differs between females and males, preventive and therapeutic interventions should take gender differences into account.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the analytical methods estimating the complexity of the heart period (HP), the linear model-based multiscale complexity (MSC) approach allows the estimation of the complexity over time scales linked to the cardiac autonomic control, i.e. in the low frequency (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz) and high frequency $(HF,\ 0.15-0.4\ Hz)$ bands. In this study we exploited MSC to evaluate the differences in the HP variability complexity during daytime (DAY) and nighttime (NIGHT) in 23 healthy females (WOMEN, age $36\pm 6yrs)$ ) and 21 males (MEN, age $35\pm 5yrs)$ performing a 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram. Parametric power spectral analysis was applied as well for comparison. Complexity indexes were computed regardless of the temporal scale (CI) and in the LF and HF bands ( $CI_{LF}$ and $CI_{HF}$, respectively). We found that the power spectral indexes did not differentiate WOMEN and MEN, while CI and $CI_{LF}$ were higher in WOMEN during DAY. The higher HP complexity in females could be explained by a lower sympathetic drive and more complex hormonal regulation than males. We conclude that MSC was more powerful than power spectral analysis in detecting gender differences in HP variability. In addition, as cardiac control differs between females and males, preventive and therapeutic interventions should take gender differences into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心率变异性短期多尺度复杂性的性别差异
在估计心脏周期(HP)复杂性的分析方法中,基于线性模型的多尺度复杂性(MSC)方法允许估计与心脏自主控制相关的时间尺度的复杂性,即在低频(LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz)和高频(HF, 0.15-0.4 Hz)$波段。在这项研究中,我们利用MSC评估了23名健康女性(女性,年龄36美元)和21名男性(男性,年龄35美元)进行24小时动态心电图时,白天(DAY)和夜间(NIGHT) HP变异性复杂性的差异。并采用参数功率谱分析进行比较。计算不同时间尺度(CI)下的LF和HF波段(分别为$CI_{LF}$和$CI_{HF}$)的复杂性指数。我们发现功率谱指数没有区分女性和男性,而CI和$CI_{LF}$在DAY期间在女性中更高。女性较高的HP复杂性可以解释为较低的交感驱动和比男性更复杂的激素调节。我们得出结论,在检测HP变异的性别差异方面,MSC比功率谱分析更有效。此外,由于女性和男性的心脏控制不同,预防和治疗干预应考虑到性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Hydroxychloroquine Dosage on the Occurrence of Arrhythmia in COVID-19 Infected Ventricle Guinea Pig ECG Changes under the Effect of New Drug Candidate TP28b Electrocardiographic Imaging of Sinus Rhythm in Pig Hearts Using Bayesian Maximum A Posteriori Estimation Sensitivity Analysis and Parameter Identification of a Cardiovascular Model in Aortic Stenosis Semi-Supervised vs. Supervised Learning for Discriminating Atrial Flutter Mechanisms Using the 12-lead ECG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1