Legal Status and Functions of the Prosecutor’s Office: European Experience

V. Nalutsyshyn
{"title":"Legal Status and Functions of the Prosecutor’s Office: European Experience","authors":"V. Nalutsyshyn","doi":"10.37491/unz.84.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comprehensive scientific analysis of the legal status and powers of prosecutors in European countries has been conducted. The position of the prosecutor’s office in the system of the state mechanism of the European countries has been investigated. The main criteria for determining the place of the prosecutor’s office in the system of state bodies have been given. Depending on the position occupied by the prosecutor’s office in the system of state bodies, four groups of states have been distinguished: 1) states where the prosecutor’s office is part of the Ministry of Justice (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland); 2) states where the prosecutor’s office is included in the judiciary (magistracy) and is in the courts (Bulgaria, Spain, Italy); 3) states where the prosecutor’s office is allocated to a separate system and is accountable to parliament (Slovakia, Hungary); 4) states where the prosecutor’s office as an independent body of the state is absent (England). It is stated that the issues of organization and activity of prosecutor’s offices in European countries are solved at the national level, but taking into account the common standards of functioning of prosecutor’s offices, which are developed at the international, supranational and regional levels. It is determined that the basic norms concerning the functioning of the prosecutor’s office in European countries are provided mainly in the acts of procedural legislation. It has been found that the prosecutor’s office in European countries has a fairly wide range of powers. They prosecute, monitor the activities of investigating judges and the judicial police, support prosecutions in court, participate in civil cases when the public interest so requires, and exercise many other powers provided by law to regulate the activities of the prosecutor’s office. It is concluded that the principles of objectivity, impartiality and independence of the prosecutor’s office are enshrined and implemented in practice in the legislation of almost all European countries. It is concluded that the general trend of development of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine should be the expansion of its functions, non-interference of the legislative and executive authorities in the substantive activities of the Prosecutor’s Office.","PeriodicalId":106913,"journal":{"name":"University Scientific Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Scientific Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.84.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive scientific analysis of the legal status and powers of prosecutors in European countries has been conducted. The position of the prosecutor’s office in the system of the state mechanism of the European countries has been investigated. The main criteria for determining the place of the prosecutor’s office in the system of state bodies have been given. Depending on the position occupied by the prosecutor’s office in the system of state bodies, four groups of states have been distinguished: 1) states where the prosecutor’s office is part of the Ministry of Justice (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland); 2) states where the prosecutor’s office is included in the judiciary (magistracy) and is in the courts (Bulgaria, Spain, Italy); 3) states where the prosecutor’s office is allocated to a separate system and is accountable to parliament (Slovakia, Hungary); 4) states where the prosecutor’s office as an independent body of the state is absent (England). It is stated that the issues of organization and activity of prosecutor’s offices in European countries are solved at the national level, but taking into account the common standards of functioning of prosecutor’s offices, which are developed at the international, supranational and regional levels. It is determined that the basic norms concerning the functioning of the prosecutor’s office in European countries are provided mainly in the acts of procedural legislation. It has been found that the prosecutor’s office in European countries has a fairly wide range of powers. They prosecute, monitor the activities of investigating judges and the judicial police, support prosecutions in court, participate in civil cases when the public interest so requires, and exercise many other powers provided by law to regulate the activities of the prosecutor’s office. It is concluded that the principles of objectivity, impartiality and independence of the prosecutor’s office are enshrined and implemented in practice in the legislation of almost all European countries. It is concluded that the general trend of development of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine should be the expansion of its functions, non-interference of the legislative and executive authorities in the substantive activities of the Prosecutor’s Office.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检察官办公室的法律地位和职能:欧洲经验
对欧洲各国检察官的法律地位和权力进行了全面、科学的分析。对欧洲国家检察机关在国家机制体系中的地位进行了研究。确定检察官办公室在国家机关系统中的地位的主要标准已经提出。根据检察官办公室在国家机构系统中所占的地位,可以区分为四类国家:1)检察官办公室隶属于司法部的国家(奥地利、比利时、丹麦、法国、德国、荷兰、波兰);2)检察官办公室包括在司法机构(地方行政机关)和法院的国家(保加利亚、西班牙、意大利);3)检察官办公室被分配到一个单独的系统并对议会负责的国家(斯洛伐克,匈牙利);4)没有作为国家独立机构的检察官办公室的国家(英国)。报告指出,欧洲国家检察官办公室的组织和活动问题是在国家一级解决的,但要考虑到在国际、超国家和区域各级制定的检察官办公室职能的共同标准。已经确定,关于欧洲国家检察官办公室职能的基本规范主要在程序法中规定。人们发现,欧洲国家的检察官办公室拥有相当广泛的权力。他们起诉,监督调查法官和司法警察的活动,在法庭上支持起诉,在公共利益需要时参与民事案件,并行使法律规定的许多其他权力来规范检察官办公室的活动。结论是,检察官办公室的客观、公正和独立原则在几乎所有欧洲国家的立法中都得到了庄严的体现和实际执行。结论是,乌克兰检察官办公室发展的总趋势应该是扩大其职能,立法和行政当局不干涉检察官办公室的实质性活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Trends In The Reform Of The Legal Status Of Farms In Ukraine Features Of The Protection Of Rights To A Logo As An Industrial Design: Ukrainian And Foreign Dimensions Automatic Mode Of Consideration Of Administrative Cases As A Form Of Administrative Proceedings In Relation Of Administrative Procedure Legislative Regulation Of Forensic Expert Activity In Ukraine Theoretical And Applied Aspects Of Modern Business Etiquette Of Tourist Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1