BRAINSTORMING TECHNIQUE TO DEVELOP THE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Nita Nurlaela Sa'ban, Wahid Hasim
{"title":"BRAINSTORMING TECHNIQUE TO DEVELOP THE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL","authors":"Nita Nurlaela Sa'ban, Wahid Hasim","doi":"10.31980/eealjournal.v2i3.1720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study entitled “Brainstorming Technique to Develop the Students’ Writing Skill” was to investigate to find out the effectiveness of brainstorming technique in teaching writing. The research was conducted to 35 students in the 2nd grade at SMP N 1 Tarogong Kidul. The data was collecting on 19 April 2016 until 17 May 2016. The researcher used a quantitative method to answer this problem. First, the students were given pre-test to know the ability students’ writing before giving treatment. Then, the students were given the treatment by teaching writing using brainstorming technique. After giving the treatment, the students’ was given a post-test. The result of pre-test and post-test were analyzed by using t-test. All the processes of collecting, analyzing and interpreting the data were aimed to test the hypothesis. The researcher used the hypothesis criterion test if:-tcritical ≤ tobserved ≥ tcritical, then alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. It means that there is significant difference of using brainstorming in students’ writing skill as the tobserved pointed at 11.884, and tcritical pointed 2.0484, so the tobserved (11.884) was higher than -tcritical (- 2.0484) and tcritical (2.0484). The research resulted, alternative (Ha) was accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. Moreover, it means that there was difference of using brainstorming in students’ writing skill.","PeriodicalId":119882,"journal":{"name":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v2i3.1720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study entitled “Brainstorming Technique to Develop the Students’ Writing Skill” was to investigate to find out the effectiveness of brainstorming technique in teaching writing. The research was conducted to 35 students in the 2nd grade at SMP N 1 Tarogong Kidul. The data was collecting on 19 April 2016 until 17 May 2016. The researcher used a quantitative method to answer this problem. First, the students were given pre-test to know the ability students’ writing before giving treatment. Then, the students were given the treatment by teaching writing using brainstorming technique. After giving the treatment, the students’ was given a post-test. The result of pre-test and post-test were analyzed by using t-test. All the processes of collecting, analyzing and interpreting the data were aimed to test the hypothesis. The researcher used the hypothesis criterion test if:-tcritical ≤ tobserved ≥ tcritical, then alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. It means that there is significant difference of using brainstorming in students’ writing skill as the tobserved pointed at 11.884, and tcritical pointed 2.0484, so the tobserved (11.884) was higher than -tcritical (- 2.0484) and tcritical (2.0484). The research resulted, alternative (Ha) was accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. Moreover, it means that there was difference of using brainstorming in students’ writing skill.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用头脑风暴技巧培养学生的写作技巧
本研究以“头脑风暴技巧培养学生写作技巧”为题,探讨头脑风暴技巧在写作教学中的有效性。本研究以太罗公小学一年级二年级35名学生为研究对象。数据收集时间为2016年4月19日至2016年5月17日。研究人员用定量方法回答了这个问题。首先,在给予治疗前对学生进行预测,了解学生的写作能力。然后,学生们接受了用头脑风暴技巧教授写作的治疗。在给予治疗后,学生们进行了一次后测。前测和后测结果采用t检验进行分析。所有收集、分析和解释数据的过程都是为了检验假设。研究者采用假设判据检验,如果-tcritical≤观察到的≥tcritical,则接受备择假设(Ha),拒绝零假设(Ho)。这意味着学生在写作技巧上使用头脑风暴存在显著差异,因为观察点为11.884,而关键点为2.0484,所以观察点(11.884)高于-tcritical(- 2.0484)和tcritical(2.0484)。研究结果,接受非择假设(Ha),拒绝零假设(Ho)。此外,这意味着头脑风暴在学生的写作技巧上存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS, WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES? THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BUILDING KNOWLEDGE OF HE FIELD (BKOF) IN TEACHING NARRATIVE TEXT ANALYSIS OF MOOD STRUCTURE IN EFL STUDENTS’ NARRATIVE TEXTS THE USE OF NATURAL DISASTER NEWS TEXT IN MODELLING STAGE TO COMPOSE NEWS ITEM TEXT: AUTHENTIC MATERIAL IN THE SECOND STAGE OF GENRE-BASED APPROACH Barriers of Online Reading Learning Faced by College Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1