Earthworm Depuration: Analysis of Coprophagy and Light Impacts

Katherine Messer, A. Wilkie
{"title":"Earthworm Depuration: Analysis of Coprophagy and Light Impacts","authors":"Katherine Messer, A. Wilkie","doi":"10.32473/ufjur.v23i.128440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earthworms are used as biomarkers to determine the bioavailability of contaminants. As such, their uptake of contaminants has been studied extensively. Protocols have been established to ensure that laboratory-obtained data are valid and comparable. However, the method of removing the organism’s gut content (depuration) before assessing the contaminant in the tissue is not standardized. The aim of this research project is to investigate some parameters for earthworm depuration: light conditions and coprophagy prevention. Eisenia fetida were depurated for 48 hours in two separate studies according to guidelines ASTM-E1676 and OECD Test No. 317. In one study, 2 frequencies of egesta removal were employed during depuration to prevent coprophagy and compared to the control (egesta and worms removed after 48 hours). In another study, the subjects and material egested were assessed under conditions of continuous darkness and the control (continuous light). The depuration methods that included egesta removal every 12 and 24 hours resulted in 62% and 10% more egested material per mg of earthworm than the control (filter paper disc change after 48 hours), respectively. The earthworms depurated in continuous darkness egested 94% more material per mg of earthworm than the control. The results indicate that depuration would be more total under continuous darkness and employing a coprophagy prevention method. These findings could lead to more efficient depuration methods.","PeriodicalId":278243,"journal":{"name":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.v23i.128440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthworms are used as biomarkers to determine the bioavailability of contaminants. As such, their uptake of contaminants has been studied extensively. Protocols have been established to ensure that laboratory-obtained data are valid and comparable. However, the method of removing the organism’s gut content (depuration) before assessing the contaminant in the tissue is not standardized. The aim of this research project is to investigate some parameters for earthworm depuration: light conditions and coprophagy prevention. Eisenia fetida were depurated for 48 hours in two separate studies according to guidelines ASTM-E1676 and OECD Test No. 317. In one study, 2 frequencies of egesta removal were employed during depuration to prevent coprophagy and compared to the control (egesta and worms removed after 48 hours). In another study, the subjects and material egested were assessed under conditions of continuous darkness and the control (continuous light). The depuration methods that included egesta removal every 12 and 24 hours resulted in 62% and 10% more egested material per mg of earthworm than the control (filter paper disc change after 48 hours), respectively. The earthworms depurated in continuous darkness egested 94% more material per mg of earthworm than the control. The results indicate that depuration would be more total under continuous darkness and employing a coprophagy prevention method. These findings could lead to more efficient depuration methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚯蚓净化:食腐及轻影响分析
蚯蚓被用作确定污染物生物利用度的生物标志物。因此,它们对污染物的吸收已被广泛研究。已经建立了协议,以确保实验室获得的数据是有效的和可比较的。然而,在评估组织中的污染物之前去除生物体肠道内容物(净化)的方法尚未标准化。本研究项目的目的是探讨蚯蚓净化的一些参数:光条件和食虫预防。根据ASTM-E1676和OECD测试No. 317,在两项独立的研究中净化了48小时。在一项研究中,在净化期间使用2次去除孕卵以防止食虫,并与对照组(48小时后去除孕卵和蠕虫)进行比较。在另一项研究中,在持续黑暗和控制(持续光照)的条件下对受试者和排出的材料进行评估。每12小时和24小时去除一次孕激素的方法比对照组(48小时后更换滤纸圆盘)每mg蚯蚓的孕激素含量分别增加62%和10%。在持续的黑暗中净化的蚯蚓比对照组每毫克多消化94%的物质。结果表明,在持续黑暗条件下,采用预防食腐的方法,净化效果更好。这些发现可能会导致更有效的净化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
University Faculty Perceptions of Climate Change in U.S. Evaluating Spatial Filtering on Diffusion MRI Data Harmonization in Parkinsonism Examining Language Interactivity Through Classifier Masked Primes in Chinese-English Bilinguals Predicting the future of mental health: (how) will in utero COVID-19 infection influence psychiatric illness in future generations?  Nazi Conspirator, Russian Patriot: Judging General Andrei Vlasov
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1