Annuities are not securities: the regulatory Island in Illinois

Michele L. Schaff, J. E. Schaff
{"title":"Annuities are not securities: the regulatory Island in Illinois","authors":"Michele L. Schaff, J. E. Schaff","doi":"10.1108/joic-10-2019-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDiscusses the significance of the Illinois Supreme Court ruling in Van Dyke v. White, which clarified that annuities are not securities in the state of Illinois, with a particular focus on the ramifications to insurance, brokerage and investment advisory standards of care as well as causes of action for breaches thereof.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nDescribes the Court’s ruling as it relates to the industry going forward. Does not discuss the specifics of the plaintiff’s case or history.\n\n\nFindings\nThe statutory language of Illinois’ securities laws specifically excludes annuities from the definition of securities. For this reason, the Illinois Department of Insurance has sole authority over regulating annuities, giving the Illinois Department of Securities no authority, except to the extent there is an investment advisor breach pursuant to §12(J) of the Illinois Securities Law of 1953. The industry has yet to react or adjust to the Court’s ruling, so there may be a future wave of reactions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAssists the reader in understanding the unique regulatory environment of annuities in Illinois, the relevant standards of care related to annuity advice and transactions, and remedies for grievances after the Illinois Supreme Court ruling in Van Dyke v. White.\n","PeriodicalId":399186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investment Compliance","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investment Compliance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-10-2019-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Discusses the significance of the Illinois Supreme Court ruling in Van Dyke v. White, which clarified that annuities are not securities in the state of Illinois, with a particular focus on the ramifications to insurance, brokerage and investment advisory standards of care as well as causes of action for breaches thereof. Design/methodology/approach Describes the Court’s ruling as it relates to the industry going forward. Does not discuss the specifics of the plaintiff’s case or history. Findings The statutory language of Illinois’ securities laws specifically excludes annuities from the definition of securities. For this reason, the Illinois Department of Insurance has sole authority over regulating annuities, giving the Illinois Department of Securities no authority, except to the extent there is an investment advisor breach pursuant to §12(J) of the Illinois Securities Law of 1953. The industry has yet to react or adjust to the Court’s ruling, so there may be a future wave of reactions. Originality/value Assists the reader in understanding the unique regulatory environment of annuities in Illinois, the relevant standards of care related to annuity advice and transactions, and remedies for grievances after the Illinois Supreme Court ruling in Van Dyke v. White.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年金不是证券:这是伊利诺斯州的监管孤岛
目的讨论伊利诺伊州最高法院在Van Dyke诉White一案中的裁决的意义,该裁决澄清了年金在伊利诺伊州不属于证券,并特别关注对保险、经纪和投资咨询的注意标准的影响,以及违反这些标准的诉因。设计/方法/方法描述法院的裁决,因为它与行业的发展有关。不讨论原告案件或历史的细节。发现伊利诺伊州证券法的法定语言明确将年金排除在证券的定义之外。因此,伊利诺斯州保险部拥有监管年金的唯一权力,除了根据1953年伊利诺斯州证券法§12(J)的规定存在投资顾问违规行为的情况外,伊利诺斯州证券部没有任何权力。该行业尚未对法院的裁决做出反应或调整,因此未来可能会有一波反应。原创性/价值帮助读者理解伊利诺斯州独特的年金监管环境,与年金咨询和交易相关的护理标准,以及伊利诺斯州最高法院在Van Dyke v. White一案中作出裁决后的申诉救济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESG litigation – how companies can get ready, respond and resolve claims Strengthening AML/CFT controls of digital payment token service providers in Singapore Understanding regulatory trends: digital assets & anti-Money laundering “Racing” to the IBOR transition finish line Structuring and financing private equity and venture capital transactions in Luxembourg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1