Towards a well-functioning stock market in context

J. Haslam, Jiao Ji, Hanwen Sun
{"title":"Towards a well-functioning stock market in context","authors":"J. Haslam, Jiao Ji, Hanwen Sun","doi":"10.1108/JCMS-01-2018-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to summarise and reflect upon key issues at the interface of prices, information and regulation with a focus upon the stock market in context. Reflecting upon academic research in the area of efficient markets, and regulatory policy, the concern is to discern issues in terms of policy and support for policy. What does the research imply for policy? Is it possible that the research, perhaps given its rhetoric, can be misinterpreted in relation to policy? The study is also concerned to develop avenues for future research based on these considerations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper is an analytical and critical review and writing.\n\n\nFindings\nThe reading of the research suggests a pragmatic regulatory policy that should be concerned to improve stock market functioning, including with respect to information, as well as the context of which this is part. At the same time, the literature may be read as promoting anti-regulatory policy.\n\n\nPractical implications\nOn the one hand, these are consistent with the pragmatic policy referred to above. On the other hand, further research is suggested to explore substantively the rhetoric of the research and its interpretation and to explore understandings of the research and its implications amongst key constituencies in practice.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe concern is to bring key insights from the academic literature together with a view to promoting a pragmatic policy orientation, while cautioning in a critical perspective about how this academic literature and research might be interpreted from a policy perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":118429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Capital Markets Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Capital Markets Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-01-2018-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to summarise and reflect upon key issues at the interface of prices, information and regulation with a focus upon the stock market in context. Reflecting upon academic research in the area of efficient markets, and regulatory policy, the concern is to discern issues in terms of policy and support for policy. What does the research imply for policy? Is it possible that the research, perhaps given its rhetoric, can be misinterpreted in relation to policy? The study is also concerned to develop avenues for future research based on these considerations. Design/methodology/approach The paper is an analytical and critical review and writing. Findings The reading of the research suggests a pragmatic regulatory policy that should be concerned to improve stock market functioning, including with respect to information, as well as the context of which this is part. At the same time, the literature may be read as promoting anti-regulatory policy. Practical implications On the one hand, these are consistent with the pragmatic policy referred to above. On the other hand, further research is suggested to explore substantively the rhetoric of the research and its interpretation and to explore understandings of the research and its implications amongst key constituencies in practice. Originality/value The concern is to bring key insights from the academic literature together with a view to promoting a pragmatic policy orientation, while cautioning in a critical perspective about how this academic literature and research might be interpreted from a policy perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
朝着一个运转良好的股市迈进
本文的目的是总结和反思在价格、信息和监管的界面上的关键问题,并以股票市场为重点。反思有效市场和监管政策领域的学术研究,关注的是在政策和政策支持方面辨别问题。这项研究对政策意味着什么?考虑到这项研究的措辞,是否有可能在政策方面被误解?本研究也关注在这些考虑的基础上为未来的研究开辟途径。设计/方法/方法这篇论文是一篇分析性和批判性的评论和写作。对研究的解读表明,应该关注一种务实的监管政策,以改善股票市场的功能,包括信息,以及它所处的环境。与此同时,这些文献可能被解读为提倡反监管政策。一方面,这些与上面提到的实用主义政策是一致的。另一方面,建议进一步研究,以实质性地探索研究的修辞及其解释,并探索研究的理解及其在实践中的重要意义。原创性/价值我们关注的是将学术文献中的关键见解结合在一起,以期促进务实的政策导向,同时以批判的角度警告如何从政策角度解释这些学术文献和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nomination and remuneration committee: a review of literature Short-sale constraints and stock returns: a systematic review Emerging market analysis of passive and active investing under bear and bull market conditions Geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, financial stress and stock returns nexus: evidence from African stock markets Corporate climate change disclosures and capital structure strategies: evidence from Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1