Recontextualizing internationalization of higher education institutions in South Korea through the lens of the knowledge–policy–power interface

Min-hee Jeon, Y. Hwang, M. Hong
{"title":"Recontextualizing internationalization of higher education institutions in South Korea through the lens of the knowledge–policy–power interface","authors":"Min-hee Jeon, Y. Hwang, M. Hong","doi":"10.1108/jice-04-2022-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to critically investigate the past hype of internationalization of higher education institutions (HEIs) and its complex international, national and local processes under the influence of globalization.Design/methodology/approachIn particular, the authors employed the knowledge–policy–power interface framework through a scoping review in order to reexamine the political dynamics among international, national and local higher education actors in driving the internationalization of HEIs in the context of South Korea between the 1990s and the 2020s. The perspective taken by this research brings much-needed nuance to the analysis by focusing on the complex dynamics of external factors and key actors and their responses in the process of internationalization.FindingsThis research found three characteristic dynamics of internationalization of Korean HEIs: uncritical acceptance of external pressures for internationalization; unbalanced formal and informal participation at the national level and different ways HEIs absorb change. In short, this research discussed how the powerful government, which has been stirred by external forces, shaped the limited knowledge discourse on internationalization while triggering power games among various HEIs. The research highlights that the characteristics of HEIs and the voices of all stakeholders should be better accounted for so that internationalization can proceed in diverse ways from the ground up to enhance and assure educational quality.Research limitations/implicationsThe research limits itself by analyzing the political dynamics in driving the internationalization of HEIs in the context of South Korea only through scoping review. However, the attempt to disentangle the underlying political dynamics through its original framework is worthy unlike previous more traditional models that cast policy-making as a uniform cycle proceeding rationally through the policy process regardless of the issue.Practical implicationsThese findings enable a better analysis of the key dynamics of how HEI internationalization policies in Korea were understood, planned and implemented. Without examining the political dynamics among various factors as well as the responses of significant actors to HEI internationalization, the current challenges and remaining tasks in translating higher education policy into practice cannot be thoroughly assessed.Social implicationsMost importantly, the multilayered political dynamics that come together to shape the content and directions of policies in a certain national context should be taken into account in the process of policy-making. Such recontextualization would provide a better understanding of the underlying dynamics that lead to certain consequences of and challenges in translating higher education policy into practice, especially for those who face the challenge of balancing between state-driven policies and ever-diversifying needs and demands of HEIs.Originality/valueAs there is a lack of understanding of the critical context of the knowledge–policy–power interface despite the significant influence of political dynamics in the process of internationalization, this research reexamined the internationalization of HEIs in Korea by providing a better understanding of the political dynamics between knowledge and power that influence the directions and contents of policy dialogues and documents.","PeriodicalId":356133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international cooperation in education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international cooperation in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jice-04-2022-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to critically investigate the past hype of internationalization of higher education institutions (HEIs) and its complex international, national and local processes under the influence of globalization.Design/methodology/approachIn particular, the authors employed the knowledge–policy–power interface framework through a scoping review in order to reexamine the political dynamics among international, national and local higher education actors in driving the internationalization of HEIs in the context of South Korea between the 1990s and the 2020s. The perspective taken by this research brings much-needed nuance to the analysis by focusing on the complex dynamics of external factors and key actors and their responses in the process of internationalization.FindingsThis research found three characteristic dynamics of internationalization of Korean HEIs: uncritical acceptance of external pressures for internationalization; unbalanced formal and informal participation at the national level and different ways HEIs absorb change. In short, this research discussed how the powerful government, which has been stirred by external forces, shaped the limited knowledge discourse on internationalization while triggering power games among various HEIs. The research highlights that the characteristics of HEIs and the voices of all stakeholders should be better accounted for so that internationalization can proceed in diverse ways from the ground up to enhance and assure educational quality.Research limitations/implicationsThe research limits itself by analyzing the political dynamics in driving the internationalization of HEIs in the context of South Korea only through scoping review. However, the attempt to disentangle the underlying political dynamics through its original framework is worthy unlike previous more traditional models that cast policy-making as a uniform cycle proceeding rationally through the policy process regardless of the issue.Practical implicationsThese findings enable a better analysis of the key dynamics of how HEI internationalization policies in Korea were understood, planned and implemented. Without examining the political dynamics among various factors as well as the responses of significant actors to HEI internationalization, the current challenges and remaining tasks in translating higher education policy into practice cannot be thoroughly assessed.Social implicationsMost importantly, the multilayered political dynamics that come together to shape the content and directions of policies in a certain national context should be taken into account in the process of policy-making. Such recontextualization would provide a better understanding of the underlying dynamics that lead to certain consequences of and challenges in translating higher education policy into practice, especially for those who face the challenge of balancing between state-driven policies and ever-diversifying needs and demands of HEIs.Originality/valueAs there is a lack of understanding of the critical context of the knowledge–policy–power interface despite the significant influence of political dynamics in the process of internationalization, this research reexamined the internationalization of HEIs in Korea by providing a better understanding of the political dynamics between knowledge and power that influence the directions and contents of policy dialogues and documents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过知识-政策-权力界面的视角重新审视韩国高等教育机构的国际化
本文旨在批判性地研究过去高等教育机构(HEIs)国际化的炒作及其在全球化影响下复杂的国际、国家和地方进程。特别是,作者通过范围审查采用了知识-政策-权力接口框架,以重新审视在20世纪90年代至21世纪20年代韩国背景下,国际、国家和地方高等教育参与者之间推动高等教育国际化的政治动态。本研究所采取的视角通过关注国际化过程中外部因素和关键行为体及其反应的复杂动态,为分析带来了急需的细微差别。研究发现韩国高等学校国际化的三个特征动态:不批判地接受国际化的外部压力;国家层面正式和非正式参与的不平衡以及高等教育机构吸收变化的不同方式。简而言之,本研究探讨了在外部力量的搅动下,强大的政府如何塑造有限的国际化知识话语,同时引发各高校之间的权力博弈。该研究强调,应更好地考虑高等教育机构的特点和所有利益相关者的声音,以便从基础开始以多种方式进行国际化,以提高和确保教育质量。研究局限/启示本研究仅通过范围审查分析了韩国背景下推动高等教育国际化的政治动态,从而限制了研究本身。然而,通过其原始框架来解开潜在政治动态的尝试是值得的,不像以前更传统的模型,将政策制定视为一个统一的周期,在政策过程中理性地进行,而不管问题是什么。这些发现有助于更好地分析韩国高等教育国际化政策是如何被理解、规划和实施的关键动态。如果不考察各种因素之间的政治动态以及重要参与者对高等教育国际化的反应,就无法彻底评估将高等教育政策转化为实践的当前挑战和剩余任务。社会影响最重要的是,在制定政策的过程中,应考虑到在特定国家背景下共同形成政策内容和方向的多层政治动态。这种重新背景化将使我们更好地理解导致将高等教育政策转化为实践的某些后果和挑战的潜在动力,特别是对于那些面临平衡国家驱动的政策和高等教育不断多样化的需求和要求的挑战的人。尽管政治动态在国际化过程中具有重要影响,但对知识-政策-权力界面的关键背景缺乏理解,本研究通过更好地理解影响政策对话和文件方向和内容的知识与权力之间的政治动态,重新审视了韩国高等教育的国际化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of quality assurance in higher education from INQAAHE GGP to ISGs − Are quality assurance agencies in Asia ready to the emerging modules? Higher education cooperation at the regional level Book review: Shadow Education in the Middle East: Private Supplementary Tutoring and its Policy Implications Birth and evolution of “social studies” in Myanmar: dramatic changes in contents and approaches How did local wisdom and practice make schools thrive during the pandemic? Evidence from a positive deviance study in rural Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1