Characteristics of Today's Applied Engineering College-Level Educator

J. Ulmer, Doug Koch, Troy E. Ollison
{"title":"Characteristics of Today's Applied Engineering College-Level Educator","authors":"J. Ulmer, Doug Koch, Troy E. Ollison","doi":"10.21061/jots.v40i1.a.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education is constantly changing and evolving. Many contend that the recent changes have not always been positive and that current changes have greatly affected applied engineering programs. The purpose of this article is to investigate and collect information regarding current issues and the current state of educators in postsecondary, applied engineering/technology programs. It is a broad overarching approach with the intent of identifying the current state, potential research needs, and concerns within the discipline. Two hundred and twelve faculty members within the United States responded to a national survey to help fellow faculty determine the current and evolving characteristics of today’s applied engineering college-level educator. Previous literature and data identifies changes related to financial challenges, salaries, technological advancement, professional experience, course load and class size, globalization, and lack of advancement opportunities. The survey sought to determine the current status of the field in those areas and found that the mean salary of $73,567 for the respondents was above the mean national higher education salaries but had a high standard deviation. Of the faculty, 74% are teaching in the classroom followed by 13% hybrid, and 13% online. The mean number of years of service outside of academia was 12.34. Regarding positional status and opportunities for advancement, the respondents were 21% contract only, 19% tenure track, and 60% tenured faculty. The data collected points out some areas that have potentially changed over time and areas that need further investigation. Long-term data is needed to establish a change in trends.","PeriodicalId":142452,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Technology Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v40i1.a.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Higher education is constantly changing and evolving. Many contend that the recent changes have not always been positive and that current changes have greatly affected applied engineering programs. The purpose of this article is to investigate and collect information regarding current issues and the current state of educators in postsecondary, applied engineering/technology programs. It is a broad overarching approach with the intent of identifying the current state, potential research needs, and concerns within the discipline. Two hundred and twelve faculty members within the United States responded to a national survey to help fellow faculty determine the current and evolving characteristics of today’s applied engineering college-level educator. Previous literature and data identifies changes related to financial challenges, salaries, technological advancement, professional experience, course load and class size, globalization, and lack of advancement opportunities. The survey sought to determine the current status of the field in those areas and found that the mean salary of $73,567 for the respondents was above the mean national higher education salaries but had a high standard deviation. Of the faculty, 74% are teaching in the classroom followed by 13% hybrid, and 13% online. The mean number of years of service outside of academia was 12.34. Regarding positional status and opportunities for advancement, the respondents were 21% contract only, 19% tenure track, and 60% tenured faculty. The data collected points out some areas that have potentially changed over time and areas that need further investigation. Long-term data is needed to establish a change in trends.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当今应用工程院校教育工作者的特点
高等教育是不断变化和发展的。许多人认为,最近的变化并不总是积极的,目前的变化已经极大地影响了应用工程项目。本文的目的是调查和收集有关当前问题和高等教育、应用工程/技术项目教育工作者现状的信息。这是一种广泛的总体方法,旨在确定该学科的当前状态、潜在的研究需求和关注点。美国的212名教师参与了一项全国性调查,以帮助其他教师确定当今应用工程学院教育工作者的当前和不断发展的特征。以前的文献和数据表明,这些变化与财务挑战、工资、技术进步、专业经验、课程负荷和班级规模、全球化和缺乏晋升机会有关。该调查旨在确定该领域在这些领域的现状,发现受访者的平均工资为73,567美元,高于全国高等教育的平均工资,但有很高的标准偏差。在教师中,74%的人在课堂教学,其次是13%的混合教学,还有13%的在线教学。在学术界以外工作的平均年数为12.34年。在职位地位和晋升机会方面,受访者中只有21%是合同制,19%是终身教职,60%是终身教职。收集到的数据指出了一些随着时间的推移可能发生变化的领域和需要进一步调查的领域。需要长期数据来确定趋势的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology Education in New Zealand Comparing Functions, Costs, and Rewards of Quality Engineers and Six Sigma Black Belts Immediate impact of dynamic graphics instruction on learners of varied levels of spatial ability Effects of Mobile Phones on Students’ Academic Performance in Religious Education Teacher Shortage and Alternative Licensure Solutions for Technical Educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1