THE RECONSOLIDATION OF TRAUMATIC MEMORIES (RTM) PROTOCOL FOR PTSD: A TREATMENT THAT WORKS

Richard Gray
{"title":"THE RECONSOLIDATION OF TRAUMATIC MEMORIES (RTM) PROTOCOL FOR PTSD: A TREATMENT THAT WORKS","authors":"Richard Gray","doi":"10.36315/2022inpact068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"PTSD treatments occupy five systemic levels—chemical, biological, neurophysiological, phenomenal, and cognitive. Pharmacological treatments bridge the chemical and biological levels. They are often imprecise in effect, and drugs imply brokenness. Direct neurophysiological manipulations include Stellate ganglion block, deep brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, etc. These are new, often invasive, and sparsely attested. EMDR and RTM employ imaginal manipulation of internal images. Cognitive manipulations work with conscious responses. Cognitive interventions may expose patients to cultural issues, especially when performed in a group context. These include hyper-masculinized expectations, military culture, shame as self-blame, etc. EMDR, cognitive, and pharmacological approaches have shown equivalent efficacy. RTM modifies the imaginal structure of trauma memories, reimagining them as nonthreatening, past events. RTM may be employed without disclosure of trauma content. We hypothesize that changes to imaginal images directly and lastingly impact neurology via the reconsolidation updating mechanism. Four published RCTs of RTM will be presented with information about a fifth unpublished study of trainee results. All studies found effect sizes exceeding 0.08 SMDs with high patient satisfaction.\"","PeriodicalId":120251,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"PTSD treatments occupy five systemic levels—chemical, biological, neurophysiological, phenomenal, and cognitive. Pharmacological treatments bridge the chemical and biological levels. They are often imprecise in effect, and drugs imply brokenness. Direct neurophysiological manipulations include Stellate ganglion block, deep brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, etc. These are new, often invasive, and sparsely attested. EMDR and RTM employ imaginal manipulation of internal images. Cognitive manipulations work with conscious responses. Cognitive interventions may expose patients to cultural issues, especially when performed in a group context. These include hyper-masculinized expectations, military culture, shame as self-blame, etc. EMDR, cognitive, and pharmacological approaches have shown equivalent efficacy. RTM modifies the imaginal structure of trauma memories, reimagining them as nonthreatening, past events. RTM may be employed without disclosure of trauma content. We hypothesize that changes to imaginal images directly and lastingly impact neurology via the reconsolidation updating mechanism. Four published RCTs of RTM will be presented with information about a fifth unpublished study of trainee results. All studies found effect sizes exceeding 0.08 SMDs with high patient satisfaction."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性记忆再巩固(rtm)治疗创伤后应激障碍:一种有效的治疗方法
“创伤后应激障碍的治疗涉及五个系统层面——化学、生物、神经生理、现象和认知。药理学治疗是化学和生物水平的桥梁。它们的效果往往不精确,而毒品意味着破碎。直接的神经生理手法包括星状神经节阻滞、深部脑刺激、经颅磁刺激等。这些都是新的,通常是侵入性的,并且很少得到证实。EMDR和RTM对内部图像进行图像处理。认知操作与意识反应一起起作用。认知干预可能会使患者暴露于文化问题,特别是在群体环境中进行时。这些包括过度男性化的期望,军事文化,羞耻感作为自责等等。EMDR、认知和药理学方法显示出相同的疗效。RTM会修改创伤记忆的想象结构,将它们重新想象成没有威胁性的过去事件。RTM可以在不披露创伤内容的情况下使用。我们假设图像的改变通过再巩固更新机制直接而持久地影响神经学。将介绍四项已发表的RTM随机对照试验以及第五项未发表的受训者结果研究的信息。所有研究都发现,效应值超过0.08个smd,患者满意度就很高。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LINKING MODAL AND AMODAL REPRESENTATIONS THROUGH LANGUAGE COMPUTATIONAL MODELS CLINICAL ASSESSMENT IN A PROFESSIONAL SETTING: ARE THERE IMPLICATIONS FOR SELF-REPORTS OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY? MALADAPTIVE COGNITIONS AND EMOTIONAL REGULATION IN PTSD DOES VACCINE SCARCITY INFLUENCE THE EFFECT OF CONSPIRACY BELIEFS ON INTENTION TO VACCINATE AGAINST COVID-19? SOURCES OF TRANSITION-TO-WORK SELF-EFFICACY: CAREER EXPLORATION AND SOCIAL SUPPORT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1