An improved treatment of operating reserves in generation expansion planning models

Sebastian Gonzato, K. Bruninx, E. Delarue
{"title":"An improved treatment of operating reserves in generation expansion planning models","authors":"Sebastian Gonzato, K. Bruninx, E. Delarue","doi":"10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy system optimisation (ESOM) and generation expansion planning (GEP) models are often used to study energy transition pathways. These typically entail an increased penetration of variable renewable energy sources (VRES), which can lead to increased operating reserve requirements due to their associated forecast uncertainty. Representing this effect has previously been tackled using either stochastic programming techniques or deterministic GEPs which use heuristics to size reserves while ignoring their activation cost. In this paper, we propose a novel GEP formulation which determines operating reserve requirements using a second order cone (SOC) constraint. This formulation approximates the solution of a stochastic GEP by accounting for reserve activation costs without resorting to scenario based methods. A case study on the Belgian system indicates possible cost savings of 70 MAC(0.9%) and less bias towards installing peaking technologies to satisfy reserve requirements compared to a deterministic GEP. The sensitivity of the results to the assumption of normality of forecast errors and temporal detail is also investigated. Two final case studies on the value of emergency measures and improving forecast uncertainties illustrate the benefits of accounting for reserve activation costs and appropriate reserve sizing.","PeriodicalId":126918,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMAPS47429.2020.9183389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy system optimisation (ESOM) and generation expansion planning (GEP) models are often used to study energy transition pathways. These typically entail an increased penetration of variable renewable energy sources (VRES), which can lead to increased operating reserve requirements due to their associated forecast uncertainty. Representing this effect has previously been tackled using either stochastic programming techniques or deterministic GEPs which use heuristics to size reserves while ignoring their activation cost. In this paper, we propose a novel GEP formulation which determines operating reserve requirements using a second order cone (SOC) constraint. This formulation approximates the solution of a stochastic GEP by accounting for reserve activation costs without resorting to scenario based methods. A case study on the Belgian system indicates possible cost savings of 70 MAC(0.9%) and less bias towards installing peaking technologies to satisfy reserve requirements compared to a deterministic GEP. The sensitivity of the results to the assumption of normality of forecast errors and temporal detail is also investigated. Two final case studies on the value of emergency measures and improving forecast uncertainties illustrate the benefits of accounting for reserve activation costs and appropriate reserve sizing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发电扩展规划模型中运营储备的改进处理
能源系统优化(ESOM)和发电扩展规划(GEP)模型常用于研究能源转换路径。这通常需要增加可变可再生能源(VRES)的渗透,由于其相关预测的不确定性,这可能导致运营储备需求增加。表示这一效应之前已经使用随机规划技术或确定性gep来解决,后者使用启发式方法来确定储量的大小,而忽略了它们的激活成本。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的GEP公式,该公式使用二阶锥(SOC)约束来确定运行储备需求。该公式通过考虑储备激活成本来近似求解随机GEP,而无需采用基于情景的方法。比利时系统的案例研究表明,与确定性GEP相比,可能节省70 MAC(0.9%)的成本,并且较少偏向于安装峰值技术以满足储备要求。结果对预测误差和时间细节正态性假设的敏感性也进行了研究。最后两个关于应急措施价值和改善预测不确定性的案例研究说明了考虑储备激活成本和适当储备规模的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Operating Reserve Assessment in Systems with Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles Framework and methodology for active distribution grid planning in Norway Parallel GPU Implementation for Fast Generating System Adequacy Assessment via Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation Distribution System Planning Considering Power Quality, Loadability and Economic Aspects Modelling and Simulation of Uncertainty in the Placement of Distributed Energy Resources for Planning Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1