Comparative Outcome of Short Proximal Femoral Nail Versus Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate in the Management of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures

Abhijith N. Das
{"title":"Comparative Outcome of Short Proximal Femoral Nail Versus Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate in the Management of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures","authors":"Abhijith N. Das","doi":"10.46889/josr.2023.4209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Trochanteric fractures are mostly due to RTA and falls. Unstable trochanteric fractures include those with a reverse oblique fracture line, intertrochanteric comminution, big posteromedial fragment, subtrochanteric extension, a broken greater trochanter and lateral cortex breach. As per the AO Classification of intertrochanteric fractures, AO31-2.2, AO31-2.3, AO31-3.1, AO31-3.2 and AO31-3.3 fall under the category of unstable trochanteric fractures. Internal fixation is mandatory to provide early mobilization of patients with partial weight-bearing and prevent further compli&cations.\n\nMaterials and Methods: 43 patients more than 18 years old with unstable trochanteric fractures, less than 3 weeks old trauma were included in the prospective study for 1 year period (1st June 2020 to 31st May 2021). 22 cases were treated with short Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) and 21 cases were treated with Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate (PFLCP).\n\nResults: (P<0.05), mean duration of surgery, blood loss was less in the PFN group (67minutes; 80mL) than PFLCP group (99 minutes; 152 ml). Union and partial weight-bearing was seen earlier in PFN group (14.1weeks; 10.6weeks) than in PFLCP group (18.7 weeks; 15.8weeks) (P<0.05). Good-excellent outcome was seen in 100% cases in PFN group and 85.71% cases in PFLCP group. There were 3 cases of delayed union in PFLCP group and 1 in PFN group. 1 PFLCP case had malunion in varus deformity.\n\nConclusion: Short PFN is the optimum implant in treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures as it is an intramedullary, load sharing device with short lever arm and hastens biological healing with early ambulation and minimal complications.","PeriodicalId":382112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/josr.2023.4209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Trochanteric fractures are mostly due to RTA and falls. Unstable trochanteric fractures include those with a reverse oblique fracture line, intertrochanteric comminution, big posteromedial fragment, subtrochanteric extension, a broken greater trochanter and lateral cortex breach. As per the AO Classification of intertrochanteric fractures, AO31-2.2, AO31-2.3, AO31-3.1, AO31-3.2 and AO31-3.3 fall under the category of unstable trochanteric fractures. Internal fixation is mandatory to provide early mobilization of patients with partial weight-bearing and prevent further compli&cations. Materials and Methods: 43 patients more than 18 years old with unstable trochanteric fractures, less than 3 weeks old trauma were included in the prospective study for 1 year period (1st June 2020 to 31st May 2021). 22 cases were treated with short Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) and 21 cases were treated with Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate (PFLCP). Results: (P<0.05), mean duration of surgery, blood loss was less in the PFN group (67minutes; 80mL) than PFLCP group (99 minutes; 152 ml). Union and partial weight-bearing was seen earlier in PFN group (14.1weeks; 10.6weeks) than in PFLCP group (18.7 weeks; 15.8weeks) (P<0.05). Good-excellent outcome was seen in 100% cases in PFN group and 85.71% cases in PFLCP group. There were 3 cases of delayed union in PFLCP group and 1 in PFN group. 1 PFLCP case had malunion in varus deformity. Conclusion: Short PFN is the optimum implant in treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures as it is an intramedullary, load sharing device with short lever arm and hastens biological healing with early ambulation and minimal complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨近端短钉与股骨近端锁定加压钢板治疗不稳定粗隆骨折的疗效比较
股骨粗隆骨折多由RTA和跌倒所致。不稳定转子骨折包括反向斜骨折线、转子间粉碎、大后内侧碎片、转子下延伸、大转子断裂和外侧皮质断裂。根据粗隆间骨折的AO分类,AO31-2.2、AO31-2.3、AO31-3.1、AO31-3.2、AO31-3.3属于不稳定粗隆骨折。内固定是强制性的,以提供部分负重患者的早期活动和防止进一步的并发症。材料和方法:43例18岁以上不稳定粗隆骨折,创伤时间小于3周的患者纳入前瞻性研究,为期1年(2020年6月1日至2021年5月31日)。用短股骨近端钉(PFN)治疗22例,用股骨近端锁定加压钢板(PFLCP)治疗21例。结果:PFN组平均手术时间、出血量明显少于PFN组(67min;80mL)比PFLCP组(99 min;152毫升)。PFN组愈合和部分负重较早(14.1周;PFLCP组(18.7周;15.8周)(P < 0.05)。PFN组有效率为100%,PFLCP组有效率为85.71%。PFLCP组延迟愈合3例,PFN组延迟愈合1例。1例PFLCP内翻畸形不愈合。结论:短PFN是治疗不稳定转子骨折的最佳植入物,因为它是一种髓内、负荷分担装置,具有短杠杆臂,能促进生物愈合,活动早,并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knee Joint Neural Sources and Pathways and Their Osteoarthritis Pathogenic Linkages and Pain Control Implications https://athenaeumpub.com/wp-content/uploads/Prevalence-of-Work-related-Musculoskeletal-Disorders-in-Early-Onset-Scoliosis-Surgeons.pdf Improvement of Life After Scoliosis Surgery: Assessment Using the SRS-30 Questionnaire Case Report of Arthroscopic Anatomical Bone Glenoid Augmentation with Subscapularis Tendon Protection with A 24 Months Follow-Up and Literature Review of The Current Concepts of Glenoid Bone Augmentation Are New Approaches Needed to Solidify Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields and Osteoarthritis Associations: A 50-year Retrospective Showing Promise but No Definitive Lab or Clinical Research Conclusions (1974-2024)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1