Initial Results of Laser Ureteroscopy Treatment for Lithiasis of the Upper Urinary Tract at Aristide Le Dantec Hospital in Dakar (Senegal)

O. Gaye, N. M. Thiam, Youssef Bellamine, M. Ndiaye, B. Fall, Y. Sow, A. Ndiath, O. Sow, A. Traoré, S. Faye, N. Ndour, M. Diaw, B. Sine, A. Sarr, A. Thiam, C. Z. Ondo, B. Diao, A. Ndoye
{"title":"Initial Results of Laser Ureteroscopy Treatment for Lithiasis of the Upper Urinary Tract at Aristide Le Dantec Hospital in Dakar (Senegal)","authors":"O. Gaye, N. M. Thiam, Youssef Bellamine, M. Ndiaye, B. Fall, Y. Sow, A. Ndiath, O. Sow, A. Traoré, S. Faye, N. Ndour, M. Diaw, B. Sine, A. Sarr, A. Thiam, C. Z. Ondo, B. Diao, A. Ndoye","doi":"10.22374/JELEU.V4I2.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In Africa, lithogenesis was initially considered rare and it was mostly caused by infections. Recent studies suggest that obesity, change in dietary habits (milk, dairy products) and hot climate can contribute to an increase of the condition in the region. Over the past decades, the management of upper urinary tract urolithiasis has evolved significantly with minimally invasive techniques. The challenge for sub-Saharan countries is related with the acquisition and the training for minimally invasive treatment. In fact, open surgery has less indications in the management of urolithiasis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the preliminary results of ureteroscopic laser treatment for upper urinary tract lithiasis in our hospital. \nMethods: This was a prospective, descriptive study realized between June 2016 and December 2018. The patients included were those who had ureteroscopic laser treatment for upper urinary tract lithiasis. The treatment was performed under general anesthesia by two surgeons. The studied parameters were: age, sex, patient medical history, comorbidities, renal function, cytobacteriological examination of urine, characteristics of lithiasis, intra and postoperative complications (using the Clavien–Dindo classification), ureteroscopic laser failures (frequency and causes). Success of treatment was defined by: the absence of a residual fragment at the renal and ureteral level or of a residual fragment <4 mm at the renal level on the control imaging. Data analysis was done with IBM SPSS Statistic 23 software. Statistical significance was considered when P < 0.05. \nResults: This study involved 43 patients. The mean age was 40.84 years ± 15.33 years. The age group between 30 and 39 years was predominant. The sex ratio was 1.26. Nephritic colic was the circumstance of discovery in 93.02%. The Uro-CT scan performed in all our patients, revealed kidney stones in 16.3% and ureteral stones in 83.7%. The right side was the most involved in 55.8%. The mean size of the stones was 12.2 mm ± 4.89 at the renal level and 12.05 mm ± 5.54 at the ureteral level. The semi-rigid ureteroscope was used in 88.37% and the flexible ureteroscope in 11.63%. The lithiasis was visualized in 74.4% of cases. Laser fragmentation was performed in 69.77% of cases. A J stent was placed after 72.1% of cases. Pelvic ureteral stripping and pelvic ureteral aspiration were realized in one case each. Acute pyelonephritis (ANP) was observed in 25.6% of patients. There were 75% fragment free at postoperative control. Any factors associated with treatment failure were not found.","PeriodicalId":136362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/JELEU.V4I2.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In Africa, lithogenesis was initially considered rare and it was mostly caused by infections. Recent studies suggest that obesity, change in dietary habits (milk, dairy products) and hot climate can contribute to an increase of the condition in the region. Over the past decades, the management of upper urinary tract urolithiasis has evolved significantly with minimally invasive techniques. The challenge for sub-Saharan countries is related with the acquisition and the training for minimally invasive treatment. In fact, open surgery has less indications in the management of urolithiasis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the preliminary results of ureteroscopic laser treatment for upper urinary tract lithiasis in our hospital. Methods: This was a prospective, descriptive study realized between June 2016 and December 2018. The patients included were those who had ureteroscopic laser treatment for upper urinary tract lithiasis. The treatment was performed under general anesthesia by two surgeons. The studied parameters were: age, sex, patient medical history, comorbidities, renal function, cytobacteriological examination of urine, characteristics of lithiasis, intra and postoperative complications (using the Clavien–Dindo classification), ureteroscopic laser failures (frequency and causes). Success of treatment was defined by: the absence of a residual fragment at the renal and ureteral level or of a residual fragment <4 mm at the renal level on the control imaging. Data analysis was done with IBM SPSS Statistic 23 software. Statistical significance was considered when P < 0.05. Results: This study involved 43 patients. The mean age was 40.84 years ± 15.33 years. The age group between 30 and 39 years was predominant. The sex ratio was 1.26. Nephritic colic was the circumstance of discovery in 93.02%. The Uro-CT scan performed in all our patients, revealed kidney stones in 16.3% and ureteral stones in 83.7%. The right side was the most involved in 55.8%. The mean size of the stones was 12.2 mm ± 4.89 at the renal level and 12.05 mm ± 5.54 at the ureteral level. The semi-rigid ureteroscope was used in 88.37% and the flexible ureteroscope in 11.63%. The lithiasis was visualized in 74.4% of cases. Laser fragmentation was performed in 69.77% of cases. A J stent was placed after 72.1% of cases. Pelvic ureteral stripping and pelvic ureteral aspiration were realized in one case each. Acute pyelonephritis (ANP) was observed in 25.6% of patients. There were 75% fragment free at postoperative control. Any factors associated with treatment failure were not found.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光输尿管镜治疗上尿路结石在塞内加尔达喀尔Aristide Le Dantec医院的初步结果
背景:在非洲,岩石作用最初被认为是罕见的,主要是由感染引起的。最近的研究表明,肥胖、饮食习惯的改变(牛奶、乳制品)和炎热的气候可能导致该地区的病情加重。在过去的几十年里,随着微创技术的发展,上尿路尿石症的治疗有了显著的发展。撒哈拉以南非洲国家面临的挑战与获取和培训微创治疗有关。事实上,开放手术治疗尿石症的适应症较少。本研究旨在评价输尿管镜下激光治疗上尿路结石的初步效果。方法:这是一项前瞻性描述性研究,于2016年6月至2018年12月期间完成。研究对象为输尿管镜下激光治疗上尿路结石的患者。两名外科医生在全身麻醉下进行治疗。研究参数包括:年龄、性别、患者病史、合并症、肾功能、尿液细胞细菌学检查、结石特征、术中及术后并发症(采用Clavien-Dindo分类)、输尿管镜激光失败(频率及原因)。治疗成功的定义是:在肾脏和输尿管水平上没有残留碎片,或者在对照成像上在肾脏水平上没有< 4mm的残留碎片。数据分析采用IBM SPSS Statistic 23软件。P < 0.05认为差异有统计学意义。结果:本研究共纳入43例患者。平均年龄40.84岁±15.33岁。30 ~ 39岁年龄组居多。性别比为1.26。93.02%的患者发现有肾绞痛。所有患者的尿路ct扫描显示,肾结石占16.3%,输尿管结石占83.7%。右侧病变最多,占55.8%。肾结石平均大小为12.2 mm±4.89,输尿管平均大小为12.05 mm±5.54。半刚性输尿管镜占88.37%,柔性输尿管镜占11.63%。74.4%的病例可见结石。激光碎裂率为69.77%。72.1%的患者置放J型支架。盆腔输尿管剥脱和盆腔输尿管误吸各1例。25.6%的患者出现急性肾盂肾炎(ANP)。术后对照有75%的碎片游离。未发现任何与治疗失败相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inverted Y Ureteral Duplication with Distal Obstructing Calculi in the Ectopic Ureter in the Prostatic Urethra Post-operative Events with Post-operative Day One Stent Removal after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Teflon Injections (STING) Mimicking Distal Ureteric Stones Proceedings of the Welsh Urological Society Annual Meeting The Role of the ClearPetra Suction Access Sheath and UROFINO Disposable Ureteroscope as an Alternative to PCNL/Conventional Flexible Ureteroscopy for a Large Renal Pelvis Stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1