{"title":"How Does Multinational Production Affect the Measurement of Competitiveness?","authors":"","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2759784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work assembles a unique bilateral dataset on multinational production in the manufacturing sector, in which value added and factor incomes are broken down by location country and by ultimate owner country. Using this dataset, which covers 44 countries over the years 2004-11, we compute measures of production capabilities in which value added is allocated across countries not according to the location of the activity but according to the nationality of the firm or of the factors involved in production (Baldwin and Kimura 1998). These indicators based on the ownership of production are then compared with standard geography-based indicators. This framework is also applied to the analysis of the two modes of supply of foreign markets (exports and FDI) using a common metric based on value added (domestic value added in exports versus value added of foreign affiliates). Overall, the evidence suggests that there are significant differences between geography-based and ownership-based measures, proving that, in an increasingly integrated global economy, ownership matters for the measurement of competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":237187,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2759784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
This work assembles a unique bilateral dataset on multinational production in the manufacturing sector, in which value added and factor incomes are broken down by location country and by ultimate owner country. Using this dataset, which covers 44 countries over the years 2004-11, we compute measures of production capabilities in which value added is allocated across countries not according to the location of the activity but according to the nationality of the firm or of the factors involved in production (Baldwin and Kimura 1998). These indicators based on the ownership of production are then compared with standard geography-based indicators. This framework is also applied to the analysis of the two modes of supply of foreign markets (exports and FDI) using a common metric based on value added (domestic value added in exports versus value added of foreign affiliates). Overall, the evidence suggests that there are significant differences between geography-based and ownership-based measures, proving that, in an increasingly integrated global economy, ownership matters for the measurement of competitiveness.
这项工作汇集了一个关于制造业跨国生产的独特双边数据集,其中按地点国家和最终所有者国家细分了增加值和要素收入。使用这个涵盖2004- 2011年间44个国家的数据集,我们计算了生产能力的度量,其中附加值在各国之间的分配不是根据活动的地点,而是根据企业的国籍或生产中涉及的要素(Baldwin and Kimura 1998)。然后将这些基于生产所有权的指标与基于地理的标准指标进行比较。这一框架也适用于分析国外市场的两种供应模式(出口和外国直接投资),使用基于增加值的共同指标(国内出口增加值与外国附属公司的增加值)。总体而言,证据表明,基于地理和基于所有权的衡量之间存在显著差异,证明在日益一体化的全球经济中,所有权对衡量竞争力很重要。