Online Stalking Legislation and Tasks for their Improvement

J. Kim
{"title":"Online Stalking Legislation and Tasks for their Improvement","authors":"J. Kim","doi":"10.22397/wlri.2023.39.2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the ambiguity surrounding the concept of stalking, there has been much difficulty in introducing laws on how to punish stalking. In short, concerns with regard to overexpanding punitive authority have acted as an obstacle to the legislation of laws on the punishment of stalking, but surprisingly enough the Act on the Punishment of Stalking Crimes was passed in 2021 after long-held discussions. Legislation and enforcement of the Act on the Punishment of Stalking Crimes have made it possible to make a full-fledged response against stalking crimes. However, this same law doesn't mean that an effective response can be made against all stalking crimes. In particular, there is much still left to be done with regard to shoring up the response against online stalking. Lately, in addition to making threats by physically approaching the victim, stalking online has come to the fore as a social issue. Unlike stalking behavior that occurs offline, online stalking is characterized by anonymity, being unconstrained by time and space, and a high degree of transmission. The semi-permanent harm from online stalking demands stronger punishment, but as these new types of crime go beyond the expected scope of existing penal laws, there's a vacuum in terms of their punishment. In particular, previous laws for punishing stalking were impracticable for punishing all types of online stalking. Therefore, legislative measures and institutional improvements were desperately needed to adequately restrict online stalking. Therefore, the present study examined laws on online stalking and reviewed in detail solutions for their improvement. Online stalking through the use of information communication networks has a lower risk when compared to stalking in person where a stalker directly comes face to face with victim. However, online stalking is unconstrained by time and place, has a higher frequency of occurrence, and its harm continues semi-permanently. Thus, its severity cannot be overlooked, and adequate laws that address it must be devised. Specifically, relaxing the requirement for establishing patterns of online stalking crimes, prevention of the spread of harm, and consolidating laws on the punishment of online stalking can prevent the spread of harm and see to delivering an adequate response against online stalking.","PeriodicalId":430360,"journal":{"name":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22397/wlri.2023.39.2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the ambiguity surrounding the concept of stalking, there has been much difficulty in introducing laws on how to punish stalking. In short, concerns with regard to overexpanding punitive authority have acted as an obstacle to the legislation of laws on the punishment of stalking, but surprisingly enough the Act on the Punishment of Stalking Crimes was passed in 2021 after long-held discussions. Legislation and enforcement of the Act on the Punishment of Stalking Crimes have made it possible to make a full-fledged response against stalking crimes. However, this same law doesn't mean that an effective response can be made against all stalking crimes. In particular, there is much still left to be done with regard to shoring up the response against online stalking. Lately, in addition to making threats by physically approaching the victim, stalking online has come to the fore as a social issue. Unlike stalking behavior that occurs offline, online stalking is characterized by anonymity, being unconstrained by time and space, and a high degree of transmission. The semi-permanent harm from online stalking demands stronger punishment, but as these new types of crime go beyond the expected scope of existing penal laws, there's a vacuum in terms of their punishment. In particular, previous laws for punishing stalking were impracticable for punishing all types of online stalking. Therefore, legislative measures and institutional improvements were desperately needed to adequately restrict online stalking. Therefore, the present study examined laws on online stalking and reviewed in detail solutions for their improvement. Online stalking through the use of information communication networks has a lower risk when compared to stalking in person where a stalker directly comes face to face with victim. However, online stalking is unconstrained by time and place, has a higher frequency of occurrence, and its harm continues semi-permanently. Thus, its severity cannot be overlooked, and adequate laws that address it must be devised. Specifically, relaxing the requirement for establishing patterns of online stalking crimes, prevention of the spread of harm, and consolidating laws on the punishment of online stalking can prevent the spread of harm and see to delivering an adequate response against online stalking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络跟踪立法及其完善任务
由于跟踪行为概念的模糊性,对跟踪行为的法律规制存在很大困难。简而言之,对过度扩大惩罚权限的担忧阻碍了跟踪犯罪的立法,但令人惊讶的是,经过长期讨论,《跟踪犯罪处罚法》于2021年获得通过。《跟踪犯罪处罚法》的立法和执行使对跟踪犯罪作出全面反应成为可能。然而,同样的法律并不意味着对所有跟踪犯罪都能做出有效的回应。特别是,在加强对网络跟踪的回应方面,还有很多工作要做。最近,除了通过身体接近受害者进行威胁外,网络跟踪也成为了一个突出的社会问题。与发生在线下的跟踪行为不同,网络跟踪行为具有匿名性、不受时间和空间限制、传播程度高等特点。网络跟踪的半永久性危害需要更严厉的惩罚,但由于这些新类型的犯罪超出了现有刑法的预期范围,因此在惩罚方面存在真空。特别是,以往惩治跟踪行为的法律对于惩罚所有类型的网络跟踪行为是不现实的。因此,迫切需要立法措施和制度改进来充分限制网络跟踪。因此,本研究考察了网络跟踪的法律,并对其改进的详细解决方案进行了回顾。通过使用信息通信网络进行的在线跟踪,与跟踪者直接与受害者面对面进行的跟踪相比,风险较低。然而,网络跟踪不受时间和地点的限制,其发生频率较高,其危害持续半永久性。因此,其严重性不容忽视,必须制定适当的法律来解决这一问题。具体而言,放宽网络跟踪犯罪的构成要件,防止危害蔓延,完善网络跟踪惩治法律,可以防止危害蔓延,有效应对网络跟踪犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The explanation of medical practice according to the Article 24-2 of the Medical Act does a protect the patient's right to self-determination? A Study on the Introduction of AI Robot Tax Analysis of Supreme Court precedents related to application period under administrative statutes and legal implications: Focusing on the Supreme Court 2021.3.18. announcement 2018Du47264 en banc decision A Study on effectiveness of the Serious Accident Punishment Act A Study on the Legal Issues of the South-North Equity Joint Venture Enterprise in Kaesong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1