U.S. beach water quality monitoring

Shore & Beach Pub Date : 2021-08-19 DOI:10.34237/1008933
Angelos Hannnides, N. Elko, T. Briggs, Sung-Chan Kim, Annie Mercer, Kyeong Park, B. Rosov, Ryan T. Searcy, M. Walther
{"title":"U.S. beach water quality monitoring","authors":"Angelos Hannnides, N. Elko, T. Briggs, Sung-Chan Kim, Annie Mercer, Kyeong Park, B. Rosov, Ryan T. Searcy, M. Walther","doi":"10.34237/1008933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal water quality is an important factor influencing public health and the quality of our nation’s beaches. In recent years, poor water quality has resulted in increased numbers of beach closures and corresponding negative impacts on tourism. This paper addresses some of the issues surrounding the management challenge of coastal water quality, in particular, beach water quality monitoring. For this effort, data on beach water quality monitoring activities conducted by states were assessed and synthesized. In total, 29 states were surveyed: 16 reported information for seawater; six reported for freshwater only; eight reported for both seawater and freshwater. Thresholds for advisories and closure vary nationally; however, all 29 states have established an online presence for their monitoring programs and display advisories and closures in real time, most often on spatial information (GIS) portals. Challenges in monitoring, prediction, and communication are assessed and discussed. Based on this assessment, the committee offers the following recommendations, as detailed in the text: \n• Standardization of water quality data and the distribution medium; \n• Enhanced public access to water quality monitoring data; \n• Consistent thresholds for swim advisories; \n• Water quality regulation reviews with stakeholder participation; • Enhanced predictive models incorporating rapid testing results; \n• Holistic water quality monitoring that includes indicators beyond fecal indicator bacteria; \n• Managing contaminants of emerging concern through identification, monitoring and control; and \n• Funding for water quality monitoring and reporting -- from federal, state, and local governments.","PeriodicalId":153020,"journal":{"name":"Shore & Beach","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shore & Beach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34237/1008933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal water quality is an important factor influencing public health and the quality of our nation’s beaches. In recent years, poor water quality has resulted in increased numbers of beach closures and corresponding negative impacts on tourism. This paper addresses some of the issues surrounding the management challenge of coastal water quality, in particular, beach water quality monitoring. For this effort, data on beach water quality monitoring activities conducted by states were assessed and synthesized. In total, 29 states were surveyed: 16 reported information for seawater; six reported for freshwater only; eight reported for both seawater and freshwater. Thresholds for advisories and closure vary nationally; however, all 29 states have established an online presence for their monitoring programs and display advisories and closures in real time, most often on spatial information (GIS) portals. Challenges in monitoring, prediction, and communication are assessed and discussed. Based on this assessment, the committee offers the following recommendations, as detailed in the text: • Standardization of water quality data and the distribution medium; • Enhanced public access to water quality monitoring data; • Consistent thresholds for swim advisories; • Water quality regulation reviews with stakeholder participation; • Enhanced predictive models incorporating rapid testing results; • Holistic water quality monitoring that includes indicators beyond fecal indicator bacteria; • Managing contaminants of emerging concern through identification, monitoring and control; and • Funding for water quality monitoring and reporting -- from federal, state, and local governments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国海滩水质监测
沿海水质是影响公众健康和我国海滩质量的重要因素。近年来,水质欠佳导致泳滩关闭的个案增加,对旅游业造成负面影响。本文讨论了有关海岸水质管理挑战的一些问题,特别是海滩水质监测。为此,评估和综合了各国进行的海滩水质监测活动的数据。共有29个州接受了调查:16个州报告了海水的信息;仅淡水报告了6例;海水和淡水均有8例。通报和关闭的门槛因国家而异;然而,所有29个州都建立了在线监控程序,并实时显示建议和关闭,最常见的是在空间信息(GIS)门户网站上。评估和讨论了监测、预测和沟通方面的挑战。根据这一评估,委员会提出如下建议,详见案文:•水质数据和分发媒介的标准化;•加强公众获取水质监测数据的途径;•一致的游泳建议阈值;•有利益相关者参与的水质法规审查;•结合快速测试结果的增强预测模型;•全面水质监测,包括粪便指示细菌以外的指标;•通过识别、监测和控制来管理新出现的污染物;•为水质监测和报告提供资金——来自联邦、州和地方政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Online Materials: The impacts of climate change on surfing resources Engineering and design of the Lightning Point Shoreline Restoration Project in Bayou La Batre, Alabama Tidal marsh restoration at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland: A case study in thin-layer placement Thin layer placement for marsh enhancement: Planning, design, construction, and monitoring considerations Evaluating direct and strategic placement of dredged material for marsh restoration through model simulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1