Random Majority Opinion Diffusion: Stabilization Time, Absorbing States, and Influential Nodes

Ahad N. Zehmakan
{"title":"Random Majority Opinion Diffusion: Stabilization Time, Absorbing States, and Influential Nodes","authors":"Ahad N. Zehmakan","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2302.06760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider a graph G with n nodes and m edges, which represents a social network, and assume that initially each node is blue or white. In each round, all nodes simultaneously update their color to the most frequent color in their neighborhood. This is called the Majority Model (MM) if a node keeps its color in case of a tie and the Random Majority Model (RMM) if it chooses blue with probability 1/2 and white otherwise. We prove that there are graphs for which RMM needs exponentially many rounds to reach a stable configuration in expectation, and such a configuration can have exponentially many states (i.e., colorings). This is in contrast to MM, which is known to always reach a stable configuration with one or two states in $O(m)$ rounds. For the special case of a cycle graph C_n, we prove the stronger and tight bounds of $\\lceil n/2\\rceil-1$ and $O(n^2)$ in MM and RMM, respectively. Furthermore, we show that the number of stable colorings in MM on C_n is equal to $\\Theta(\\Phi^n)$, where $\\Phi = (1+\\sqrt{5})/2$ is the golden ratio, while it is equal to 2 for RMM. We also study the minimum size of a winning set, which is a set of nodes whose agreement on a color in the initial coloring enforces the process to end in a coloring where all nodes share that color. We present tight bounds on the minimum size of a winning set for both MM and RMM. Furthermore, we analyze our models for a random initial coloring, where each node is colored blue independently with some probability $p$ and white otherwise. Using some martingale analysis and counting arguments, we prove that the expected final number of blue nodes is respectively equal to $(2p^2-p^3)n/(1-p+p^2)$ and pn in MM and RMM on a cycle graph C_n. Finally, we conduct some experiments which complement our theoretical findings and also lead to the proposal of some intriguing open problems and conjectures to be tackled in future work.","PeriodicalId":326727,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Consider a graph G with n nodes and m edges, which represents a social network, and assume that initially each node is blue or white. In each round, all nodes simultaneously update their color to the most frequent color in their neighborhood. This is called the Majority Model (MM) if a node keeps its color in case of a tie and the Random Majority Model (RMM) if it chooses blue with probability 1/2 and white otherwise. We prove that there are graphs for which RMM needs exponentially many rounds to reach a stable configuration in expectation, and such a configuration can have exponentially many states (i.e., colorings). This is in contrast to MM, which is known to always reach a stable configuration with one or two states in $O(m)$ rounds. For the special case of a cycle graph C_n, we prove the stronger and tight bounds of $\lceil n/2\rceil-1$ and $O(n^2)$ in MM and RMM, respectively. Furthermore, we show that the number of stable colorings in MM on C_n is equal to $\Theta(\Phi^n)$, where $\Phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2$ is the golden ratio, while it is equal to 2 for RMM. We also study the minimum size of a winning set, which is a set of nodes whose agreement on a color in the initial coloring enforces the process to end in a coloring where all nodes share that color. We present tight bounds on the minimum size of a winning set for both MM and RMM. Furthermore, we analyze our models for a random initial coloring, where each node is colored blue independently with some probability $p$ and white otherwise. Using some martingale analysis and counting arguments, we prove that the expected final number of blue nodes is respectively equal to $(2p^2-p^3)n/(1-p+p^2)$ and pn in MM and RMM on a cycle graph C_n. Finally, we conduct some experiments which complement our theoretical findings and also lead to the proposal of some intriguing open problems and conjectures to be tackled in future work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机多数意见扩散:稳定时间、吸收状态和影响节点
考虑一个有n个节点和m条边的图G,它代表一个社交网络,并假设最初每个节点都是蓝色或白色的。在每一轮中,所有节点同时更新自己的颜色,使其成为邻近区域中最常见的颜色。如果一个节点在平局的情况下保持其颜色,则称为多数模型(MM);如果它以1/2的概率选择蓝色,否则选择白色,则称为随机多数模型(RMM)。我们证明了存在RMM需要指数次轮数才能达到期望中的稳定配置的图,并且这种配置可以具有指数次的状态(即着色)。这与MM相反,众所周知,MM总是在$O(m)$轮中达到一个或两个状态的稳定配置。对于循环图C_n的特殊情况,分别证明了在MM和RMM中$\lceil n/2\rceil-1$和$O(n^2)$的强边界和紧边界。进一步,我们证明了在C_n上,MM中稳定着色的数量等于$\Theta(\Phi^n)$,其中$\Phi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2$是黄金比例,而RMM的黄金比例等于2。我们还研究了获胜集的最小大小,获胜集是一组节点,它们在初始着色时对一种颜色达成一致,从而强制整个过程以所有节点共享该颜色的着色结束。对于MM和RMM,我们给出了获胜集最小大小的严格界限。此外,我们分析了随机初始着色的模型,其中每个节点以一定概率分别为蓝色$p$和白色。利用一些鞅分析和计数参数,证明了循环图C_n上的MM和RMM中的预期最终蓝节点数分别等于$(2p^2-p^3)n/(1-p+p^2)$和pn。最后,我们进行了一些实验来补充我们的理论发现,并提出了一些有趣的开放性问题和猜想,以便在未来的工作中解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discovering Consistent Subelections Strategic Cost Selection in Participatory Budgeting Minimizing State Exploration While Searching Graphs with Unknown Obstacles vMFER: von Mises-Fisher Experience Resampling Based on Uncertainty of Gradient Directions for Policy Improvement of Actor-Critic Algorithms Reinforcement Nash Equilibrium Solver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1