Changes in reading research proposition: some psychological aspects of reading 2.0

Adam Sofronijević
{"title":"Changes in reading research proposition: some psychological aspects of reading 2.0","authors":"Adam Sofronijević","doi":"10.1145/2064058.2064073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reading process as a paradigm for the intimate experience and individual cogitation of the content is changing, mostly because of technological and social innovations known as the Web 2.0. Emerging new quality in reading is described via Reading 2.0 concept. This concept is in turn contrasted with the concept of a Solitary reader that focuses on some aspects of the reading process as perceived in the past. In this context research proposal of some psychological aspects of Reading 2.0 is presented. Building on available research in text structure importance for cognitive processes during comprehension of scientific texts, the role of interactivity and collaboration in changing readers' misconceptions are proposed as important research areas. Various aspects of collaboration and interactivity are compared in regards to two different text structures in order to develop plausible scenarios for testing changes in readers' erroneous prior knowledge. Further research in this area is proposed and benefits that might arise from better understanding of discussed phenomena are described. Some conclusions on research directions and possibilities are presented. Possibilities for a librarian's role in the interpretive communities embracing interactivity and collaboration in reading are discussed in order to enhance research proposal and provide an input for the future of this profession.","PeriodicalId":258166,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Research Advances in Large Digital Book Repositories","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Research Advances in Large Digital Book Repositories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2064058.2064073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The reading process as a paradigm for the intimate experience and individual cogitation of the content is changing, mostly because of technological and social innovations known as the Web 2.0. Emerging new quality in reading is described via Reading 2.0 concept. This concept is in turn contrasted with the concept of a Solitary reader that focuses on some aspects of the reading process as perceived in the past. In this context research proposal of some psychological aspects of Reading 2.0 is presented. Building on available research in text structure importance for cognitive processes during comprehension of scientific texts, the role of interactivity and collaboration in changing readers' misconceptions are proposed as important research areas. Various aspects of collaboration and interactivity are compared in regards to two different text structures in order to develop plausible scenarios for testing changes in readers' erroneous prior knowledge. Further research in this area is proposed and benefits that might arise from better understanding of discussed phenomena are described. Some conclusions on research directions and possibilities are presented. Possibilities for a librarian's role in the interpretive communities embracing interactivity and collaboration in reading are discussed in order to enhance research proposal and provide an input for the future of this profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读研究命题的变化:阅读2.0的一些心理层面
阅读过程作为一种亲密体验和个人对内容的思考的范例正在发生变化,这主要是因为被称为Web 2.0的技术和社会创新。阅读2.0概念描述了阅读中出现的新品质。这一概念反过来又与“孤独的读者”的概念形成对比,后者关注过去所感知的阅读过程的某些方面。在此背景下,本文提出了阅读2.0的一些心理方面的研究建议。基于现有的关于文本结构对科学文本理解过程中认知过程重要性的研究,互动性和协作在改变读者误解方面的作用被提出为重要的研究领域。在两种不同的文本结构中比较了协作和互动的各个方面,以便为测试读者错误先验知识的变化制定合理的方案。提出了在这一领域的进一步研究,并描述了更好地理解所讨论的现象可能产生的好处。最后对研究方向和可能性进行了总结。为了加强研究计划,并为这一职业的未来提供输入,我们讨论了图书馆员在解读社区中扮演的角色的可能性,包括阅读中的互动性和协作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Search and exploration of scanned books Personalized recommendations on books for K-12 readers Need for automatically generated narration Accessible, large-print, listening & talking e-book (ALIT) Stylometric relevance-feedback towards a hybrid book recommendation algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1