Populating Solitude

Emily Steinlight
{"title":"Populating Solitude","authors":"Emily Steinlight","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501710704.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents modern biopolitics taking its first recognizable shape in the late eighteenth century, coming to the fore in a prolonged clash between Thomas Malthus and two generations of Romantic writers. It examines how the responses of William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, William Godwin, Percy Shelley, and William Hazlitt in the principle of population helped consolidate literature's ethical as well as aesthetic importance. The chapter also looks at Wordsworth's and Coleridge's Lyrical Ballads, which introduced what Wordsworth called a “new species of poetry” and charted a bold course for its future. It then shifts to discuss Malthus's Essay on the Principle of Population, which advanced a troubling hypothesis about the future of the human species. Ultimately, the chapter explicates Shelley's Gothic romance of life-production as a timely experiment in Romantic political theory. The heterogeneous mass of flesh assembled by her protagonist grants ambiguously human form to the nineteenth century's revised conception of the populace.","PeriodicalId":251461,"journal":{"name":"Populating the Novel","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Populating the Novel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501710704.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter presents modern biopolitics taking its first recognizable shape in the late eighteenth century, coming to the fore in a prolonged clash between Thomas Malthus and two generations of Romantic writers. It examines how the responses of William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, William Godwin, Percy Shelley, and William Hazlitt in the principle of population helped consolidate literature's ethical as well as aesthetic importance. The chapter also looks at Wordsworth's and Coleridge's Lyrical Ballads, which introduced what Wordsworth called a “new species of poetry” and charted a bold course for its future. It then shifts to discuss Malthus's Essay on the Principle of Population, which advanced a troubling hypothesis about the future of the human species. Ultimately, the chapter explicates Shelley's Gothic romance of life-production as a timely experiment in Romantic political theory. The heterogeneous mass of flesh assembled by her protagonist grants ambiguously human form to the nineteenth century's revised conception of the populace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
填充孤独
这一章介绍了现代生命政治在18世纪晚期首次出现,并在托马斯·马尔萨斯和两代浪漫主义作家之间的长期冲突中脱颖而出。它考察了威廉·华兹华斯、塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治、威廉·戈德温、珀西·雪莱和威廉·黑兹利特对人口原理的回应如何帮助巩固了文学的伦理和美学重要性。这一章还考察了华兹华斯和柯勒律治的《抒情歌谣》,它引入了华兹华斯所谓的“诗歌新品种”,并为其未来描绘了大胆的道路。然后,它转向讨论马尔萨斯的《人口原理》,其中提出了一个关于人类物种未来的令人不安的假设。最后,本章将雪莱的哥特浪漫主义的生活生产作为浪漫主义政治理论的一次及时的实验。她的主人公聚集在一起的异质肉体赋予了19世纪修订后的大众概念模糊的人类形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction. The Biopolitical Imagination Chapter 3. Dickens’s Supernumeraries Index Chapter 5. “Because We Are Too Menny” Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1