Preface to the Second Paperback Printing

T. G. Jordan
{"title":"Preface to the Second Paperback Printing","authors":"T. G. Jordan","doi":"10.7560/780514-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am pleased that Texas Log Buildings has been brought to a new edition. As the reader will detect in the pages of this book, I am deeply devoted to the material reminders of the traditional Texas. I wrote the book out of a sense of impending loss of legacy: If we Texans were not going to preserve any substantial number of these old wooden buildings, then at least a record of them ought to be committed to print. Books live on through reprints and new editions, confounding the impermanence of the medium of paper. My fears in the 1970s that the wooden folk architecture of Texas was endangered have proven well-founded. Texas Log Buildings achieved recognition and had honors bestowed upon it—most notably the Coral Horton TuUis award from the Texas State Historical Association as the best book of 1978, the Award of Merit from the American Association for State and Local History, and the 1979 Award for Research from the Texas Heritage Council—but the loss of log buildings in the state has, nevertheless, continued almost unabated. In counties such as Denton, where I found scores of surviving log buildings two decades ago, the numbers have dwindled alarmingly. Indeed, this book could hardly be written today, so depleted has the data base become. At the same time, the book helped spur the rescue of some log buildings that otherwise would have perished. Both public and private efforts can be noted. We still lack a Texas equivalent of Old World Wisconsin or Upper Canada Village—both large, centralized open-air museums—but small local collections have proliferated, and the list of log buildings on museum display in Texas (pages 185-187) could be considerably lengthened today. The Gonzales Pioneer Village, the Jourdan-Bachman Farm at Austin, and Millard's Crossing in Nacogdoches deserve special mention. Certain private Texans have rescued log houses to use as their residences or places of business, making folk buildings a part of the functional, living cultural landscape. That is the best avenue to meaningful historic preservation. These enlightened Texans include Karen and Mike Collins of Austin, Carroll Tharp of Montgomery County, George Russell of Huntsville, Oliver and Betty McBryde of rural Yoakum, and others. Bless them all— even those, such as O. G. McClain of Houston, whose efforts failed. We have still not convinced the majority of Texans that historic preservation is essential to the survival of Texas as a distinctive, appealing place and region. Blind faith in progress, unreasoned contempt for old-fashioned things, and worship of anything new are still the norm in the Lone Star state. Perhaps this reissue of Texas Log Buildings will chip away a little more at that established view. As for the findings presented in Texas","PeriodicalId":422363,"journal":{"name":"Texas Log Buildings","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Log Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/780514-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I am pleased that Texas Log Buildings has been brought to a new edition. As the reader will detect in the pages of this book, I am deeply devoted to the material reminders of the traditional Texas. I wrote the book out of a sense of impending loss of legacy: If we Texans were not going to preserve any substantial number of these old wooden buildings, then at least a record of them ought to be committed to print. Books live on through reprints and new editions, confounding the impermanence of the medium of paper. My fears in the 1970s that the wooden folk architecture of Texas was endangered have proven well-founded. Texas Log Buildings achieved recognition and had honors bestowed upon it—most notably the Coral Horton TuUis award from the Texas State Historical Association as the best book of 1978, the Award of Merit from the American Association for State and Local History, and the 1979 Award for Research from the Texas Heritage Council—but the loss of log buildings in the state has, nevertheless, continued almost unabated. In counties such as Denton, where I found scores of surviving log buildings two decades ago, the numbers have dwindled alarmingly. Indeed, this book could hardly be written today, so depleted has the data base become. At the same time, the book helped spur the rescue of some log buildings that otherwise would have perished. Both public and private efforts can be noted. We still lack a Texas equivalent of Old World Wisconsin or Upper Canada Village—both large, centralized open-air museums—but small local collections have proliferated, and the list of log buildings on museum display in Texas (pages 185-187) could be considerably lengthened today. The Gonzales Pioneer Village, the Jourdan-Bachman Farm at Austin, and Millard's Crossing in Nacogdoches deserve special mention. Certain private Texans have rescued log houses to use as their residences or places of business, making folk buildings a part of the functional, living cultural landscape. That is the best avenue to meaningful historic preservation. These enlightened Texans include Karen and Mike Collins of Austin, Carroll Tharp of Montgomery County, George Russell of Huntsville, Oliver and Betty McBryde of rural Yoakum, and others. Bless them all— even those, such as O. G. McClain of Houston, whose efforts failed. We have still not convinced the majority of Texans that historic preservation is essential to the survival of Texas as a distinctive, appealing place and region. Blind faith in progress, unreasoned contempt for old-fashioned things, and worship of anything new are still the norm in the Lone Star state. Perhaps this reissue of Texas Log Buildings will chip away a little more at that established view. As for the findings presented in Texas
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二次平装印刷前言
我很高兴德州原木建筑已经带来了一个新的版本。正如读者将在本书中发现的那样,我深深致力于传统德克萨斯的材料提醒。我写这本书是出于一种即将失去遗产的感觉:如果我们德克萨斯人不打算保留任何大量的这些古老的木制建筑,那么至少应该致力于将它们的记录打印出来。书籍通过再版和新版本得以延续,混淆了纸张媒介的无常。上世纪70年代,我曾担心德克萨斯州的木质民间建筑正濒临灭绝,事实证明这是有根据的。《德克萨斯原木建筑》获得了认可,并获得了荣誉——最著名的是1978年德克萨斯州历史协会颁发的最佳图书科勒·霍顿·图伊斯奖,美国州和地方历史协会颁发的优异奖,以及1979年德克萨斯州遗产委员会颁发的研究奖——但该州原木建筑的流失几乎有增无减。在像丹顿这样的县,我在20年前发现了几十座幸存的原木建筑,但现在数量已经惊人地减少了。事实上,这本书在今天很难写出来,因为数据库已经耗尽了。与此同时,这本书帮助推动了对一些原本会倒塌的原木建筑的救援。公共和私人的努力都值得注意。我们仍然缺乏德克萨斯州的旧世界威斯康辛或上加拿大村——两者都是大型的,集中的露天博物馆——但是小型的地方收藏已经激增,并且在德克萨斯州博物馆展出的原木建筑清单(第185-187页)今天可以大大延长。冈萨雷斯先锋村、奥斯汀的Jourdan-Bachman农场和纳科多奇斯的Millard’s Crossing值得特别提及。一些德州人拯救了原木房屋作为住所或办公场所,使民间建筑成为功能性、生活化的文化景观的一部分。这是有意义的历史保护的最佳途径。这些开明的德克萨斯人包括奥斯汀的卡伦和迈克·柯林斯,蒙哥马利县的卡罗尔·萨普,亨茨维尔的乔治·罗素,尤库姆农村的奥利弗和贝蒂·麦克布赖德等等。祝福他们所有人——即使是那些努力失败的人,比如休斯顿的O. G.麦克莱恩。我们仍然没有说服大多数德州人,历史保护对德州作为一个独特的、有吸引力的地方和地区的生存至关重要。对进步的盲目信仰,对过时事物的无理蔑视,以及对任何新事物的崇拜,仍然是这个孤星之州的常态。也许这个德州原木建筑的重新发行将会在这个既定的观点上削去一点更多。至于在德克萨斯州提出的调查结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
1. A List of Texas Restoration Projects Open to the Public That Include Log Structures 2. The Origin & Diffusion of Log Folk Architecture 7. Log Public Buildings 8. Rural Log Outbuildings Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1