A Study of APIs for Graph Analytics Workloads

Hochan Lee, D. Wong, Loc Hoang, Roshan Dathathri, G. Gill, Vishwesh Jatala, D. Kuck, K. Pingali
{"title":"A Study of APIs for Graph Analytics Workloads","authors":"Hochan Lee, D. Wong, Loc Hoang, Roshan Dathathri, G. Gill, Vishwesh Jatala, D. Kuck, K. Pingali","doi":"10.1109/IISWC50251.2020.00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, parallel graph analytics workloads have been implemented in systems like Pregel, GraphLab, Galois, and Ligra that support graph data structures and graph operations directly. An alternative approach is to express graph workloads in terms of sparse matrix kernels such as sparse matrix-vector and matrix-matrix multiplication. An API for these kernels has been defined by the GraphBLAS project. The SuiteSparse project has implemented this API on shared-memory platforms, and the LAGraph project is building a library of graph algorithms using this API. How does the matrix-based approach perform compared to the graph-based approach? Our experiments on a 56 core CPU show that for representative graph workloads, LAGraph/SuiteSparse solutions are 5x slower on the average than Galois solutions. We argue that this performance gap arises from inherent limitations of a matrix-based API: regardless of which architecture a matrix-based algorithm is run on, it is subject to the same inherent limitations of the matrix-based API.","PeriodicalId":365983,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC50251.2020.00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traditionally, parallel graph analytics workloads have been implemented in systems like Pregel, GraphLab, Galois, and Ligra that support graph data structures and graph operations directly. An alternative approach is to express graph workloads in terms of sparse matrix kernels such as sparse matrix-vector and matrix-matrix multiplication. An API for these kernels has been defined by the GraphBLAS project. The SuiteSparse project has implemented this API on shared-memory platforms, and the LAGraph project is building a library of graph algorithms using this API. How does the matrix-based approach perform compared to the graph-based approach? Our experiments on a 56 core CPU show that for representative graph workloads, LAGraph/SuiteSparse solutions are 5x slower on the average than Galois solutions. We argue that this performance gap arises from inherent limitations of a matrix-based API: regardless of which architecture a matrix-based algorithm is run on, it is subject to the same inherent limitations of the matrix-based API.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图形分析工作负载的api研究
传统上,并行图分析工作负载已经在像Pregel、GraphLab、Galois和Ligra这样的系统中实现,这些系统直接支持图数据结构和图操作。另一种方法是用稀疏矩阵核(如稀疏矩阵-向量和矩阵-矩阵乘法)来表示图工作负载。GraphBLAS项目已经为这些内核定义了一个API。SuiteSparse项目已经在共享内存平台上实现了这个API, laggraph项目正在使用这个API构建一个图算法库。与基于图的方法相比,基于矩阵的方法的性能如何?我们在56核CPU上的实验表明,对于代表性的图形工作负载,graph /SuiteSparse解决方案平均比Galois解决方案慢5倍。我们认为,这种性能差距源于基于矩阵的API的固有限制:无论基于矩阵的算法在哪个架构上运行,它都受到基于矩阵的API的相同固有限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizing Committee : IISWC 2020 Characterizing the impact of last-level cache replacement policies on big-data workloads AI on the Edge: Characterizing AI-based IoT Applications Using Specialized Edge Architectures Empirical Analysis and Modeling of Compute Times of CNN Operations on AWS Cloud Reliability Modeling of NISQ- Era Quantum Computers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1