{"title":"Load balancing for distributed branch & bound algorithms","authors":"Reinhard Lüling, B. Monien","doi":"10.1109/IPPS.1992.222970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors present a new load balancing strategy and its application to distributed branch & bound algorithms and demonstrate its efficiency by solving some NP-complete problems on a network of up to 256 transputers. The parallelization of their branch & bound algorithm is fully distributed. Every processor performs the same algorithm but each on a different part of the solution tree. In this case it is necessary to distribute subproblems among the processors to achieve a well balanced workload. Their load balancing method overcomes the problem of search overhead and idle times by an appropriate load model and avoids trashing effects by a feedback control method. Using this strategy they were able to achieve a speedup of up to 237.32 on a 256 processor network for very short parallel computation times, compared to an efficient sequential algorithm.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":340070,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1992.222970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82
Abstract
The authors present a new load balancing strategy and its application to distributed branch & bound algorithms and demonstrate its efficiency by solving some NP-complete problems on a network of up to 256 transputers. The parallelization of their branch & bound algorithm is fully distributed. Every processor performs the same algorithm but each on a different part of the solution tree. In this case it is necessary to distribute subproblems among the processors to achieve a well balanced workload. Their load balancing method overcomes the problem of search overhead and idle times by an appropriate load model and avoids trashing effects by a feedback control method. Using this strategy they were able to achieve a speedup of up to 237.32 on a 256 processor network for very short parallel computation times, compared to an efficient sequential algorithm.<>