Effect of curriculum teaching on freshmen’s mental health literacy

S. Bin, Hou Jinbo, Li Chenling
{"title":"Effect of curriculum teaching on freshmen’s mental health literacy","authors":"S. Bin, Hou Jinbo, Li Chenling","doi":"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2021.04.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The purpose of this study is to investigate the status of freshmen’s mental health\n literacy and its impact on mental health and to provide a reference for probing into\n the effectiveness and sustainality of curriculum education as the main channel of\n improvement of mental health literacy.\n Methods Mental health literacy questionnaire for Chinese adults and college students mental\n health screening scale were used to investigate 2 878 freshmen in a university in\n Wuhan. Mental health literacy was one of the indicators of course teaching evaluation.\n The curriculum intervention effect was investigated through pre-test, post-test and\n 10-month follow-up.\n Results The mental health literacy of freshmen (40.12±6.57) was higher than the national\n average level (35.81±8.06), but lower than the average level in terms of self-help\n mental health literacy (\n F = 28.25, P<0.01). There were gender differences and urban-rural differences in mental health\n literacy. The mental health literacy of freshmen without psychological problems was\n significantly higher than that of freshmen with psychological problems (\n F = 374.80, P<0.01). Structured course teaching significantly improved freshmen’s mental health\n literacy, which were still significant after 10 months.\n Conclusion College freshmen’s mental health literacy is generally great, and the mental health\n curriculum improved their mental health literacy.\n 【摘要】 目的 了解大学新生的心理健康素养现状及其对心理健康的影响, 为探査课程教学作为提髙心理健康素养主渠 道的有效性与可持续性提供参考。\n 方法 采用《国民心理健康素养问卷》和《中国大学生心理健康筛査量表》对武汉某髙 校2 878名新生进行调査, 并将心理健康素养作为大学新生心理健康课程教学的评估指标, 通过前测、后测及10个月后追\n 踪探査课程干预效果。 结果 大学新生心理健康素养总体得分 (40.12±6.57)髙于全国平均水平 (35.81±8.06);心理健康 素养存在性别和城乡差异;无心理问题新生的心理健康素养总分髙于有心理问题新生\n (\n F = 28.25, P<0.01)。课程教学显著 提升了新生的心理健康素养, 10个月后追踪发现效果依然显著 (\n F =374.80, P<0.01)。 结论 大学新生心理健康素养总体 较好, 心理健康教育课程提髙了心理健康素养。","PeriodicalId":106801,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of School Health","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2021.04.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study is to investigate the status of freshmen’s mental health literacy and its impact on mental health and to provide a reference for probing into the effectiveness and sustainality of curriculum education as the main channel of improvement of mental health literacy. Methods Mental health literacy questionnaire for Chinese adults and college students mental health screening scale were used to investigate 2 878 freshmen in a university in Wuhan. Mental health literacy was one of the indicators of course teaching evaluation. The curriculum intervention effect was investigated through pre-test, post-test and 10-month follow-up. Results The mental health literacy of freshmen (40.12±6.57) was higher than the national average level (35.81±8.06), but lower than the average level in terms of self-help mental health literacy ( F = 28.25, P<0.01). There were gender differences and urban-rural differences in mental health literacy. The mental health literacy of freshmen without psychological problems was significantly higher than that of freshmen with psychological problems ( F = 374.80, P<0.01). Structured course teaching significantly improved freshmen’s mental health literacy, which were still significant after 10 months. Conclusion College freshmen’s mental health literacy is generally great, and the mental health curriculum improved their mental health literacy. 【摘要】 目的 了解大学新生的心理健康素养现状及其对心理健康的影响, 为探査课程教学作为提髙心理健康素养主渠 道的有效性与可持续性提供参考。 方法 采用《国民心理健康素养问卷》和《中国大学生心理健康筛査量表》对武汉某髙 校2 878名新生进行调査, 并将心理健康素养作为大学新生心理健康课程教学的评估指标, 通过前测、后测及10个月后追 踪探査课程干预效果。 结果 大学新生心理健康素养总体得分 (40.12±6.57)髙于全国平均水平 (35.81±8.06);心理健康 素养存在性别和城乡差异;无心理问题新生的心理健康素养总分髙于有心理问题新生 ( F = 28.25, P<0.01)。课程教学显著 提升了新生的心理健康素养, 10个月后追踪发现效果依然显著 ( F =374.80, P<0.01)。 结论 大学新生心理健康素养总体 较好, 心理健康教育课程提髙了心理健康素养。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课程教学对新生心理健康素养的影响
目的了解大学新生心理健康素养现状及其对心理健康的影响,为探讨课程教育作为提高心理健康素养的主渠道的有效性和可持续性提供参考。方法采用《中国成人心理健康素养问卷》和《大学生心理健康筛查量表》对武汉某高校2 878名新生进行调查。心理健康素养是课程教学评价的指标之一。通过测试前、测试后和10个月的随访来调查课程干预效果。结果大学新生心理健康素养(40.12±6.57)高于全国平均水平(35.81±8.06),但低于全国平均水平(F = 28.25, P<0.01)。心理健康素养存在性别差异和城乡差异。无心理问题的新生心理健康素养显著高于有心理问题的新生(F = 374.80, P<0.01)。结构化课程教学显著提高了新生的心理健康素养,10个月后仍显著提高。结论大学新生的心理健康素养总体较高,心理健康课程提高了大学生的心理健康素养。【摘要】 目的 了解大学新生的心理健康素养现状及其对心理健康的影响, 为探査课程教学作为提髙心理健康素养主渠 道的有效性与可持续性提供参考。 方法 采用《国民心理健康素养问卷》和《中国大学生心理健康筛査量表》对武汉某髙 校2 878名新生进行调査, 并将心理健康素养作为大学新生心理健康课程教学的评估指标, 通过前测、后测及10个月后追 踪探査课程干预效果。 结果大学新生心理健康素养总体得分(40.12±6.57)髙于全国平均水平(35.81±8.06);心理健康素养存在性别和城乡差异;无心理问题新生的心理健康素养总分髙于有心理问题新生(F = 28.25, P < 0.01)。课程教学显著提升了新生的心理健康素养,10个月后追踪发现效果依然显著(F = 374.80, P < 0.01)。结论 大学新生心理健康素养总体 较好, 心理健康教育课程提髙了心理健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of violent video games and other factors on aggressive behavior of junior high school students in Shanghai Analysis of risk factors for vasovagal syncope in children Prevalence of eating out and its association with overweight and obesity among children and adolescents in Hebei Province Psychoactive substance abuse and associated factors among middle school students in Liaoning Relationship between classroom lighting and poor vision of students in primary and secondary schools in Tianjin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1