Risk allocation with Shapley value in the risk aggregation framework

Antonio Lugoboni, Banco Bpm, Nicola Picchiotti, A. Spuntarelli
{"title":"Risk allocation with Shapley value in the risk aggregation framework","authors":"Antonio Lugoboni, Banco Bpm, Nicola Picchiotti, A. Spuntarelli","doi":"10.47473/2020rmm0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of risk aggregation arises from the need to incorporate in a single measure the overall exposure to the different risk types. In general, the methodologies adopted for the purposes of risk integration are based on the principle that the overall economic capital is lower than the simple algebraic sum of economic capital measures related to individual risks. This phenomenon, due to the existence of an imperfect correlation between the risks, determines, in line with portfolio theory, a \"diversification benefit\". The issue of risk allocation subsequently arises when the risk value of the diversified aggregated loss needs to be reassigned to the different risk classes. A similar issue has been solved in the framework of cooperative Game Theory, where the Shapley value provides a player-specific contribution of the total surplus generated by the coalition. The paper proposes a novel application of the Shapley formula in the ICAAP context (Pillar II - economic view). In particular, we show that the Shapley value is the unique solution to the allocation problem of an overall risk value, granting the fundamental requested properties, including the efficiency one. An exemplificative model application is reported, as well as a comparison with a benchmark methodology. The experimental part shows the advantages of the novel approach in terms of precision and reliability of the estimates. Finally, it is important to mention that the presented framework can be applied also in other contexts such as, for instance, in the risk class attribution of the operational risk.","PeriodicalId":296057,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management Magazine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47473/2020rmm0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic of risk aggregation arises from the need to incorporate in a single measure the overall exposure to the different risk types. In general, the methodologies adopted for the purposes of risk integration are based on the principle that the overall economic capital is lower than the simple algebraic sum of economic capital measures related to individual risks. This phenomenon, due to the existence of an imperfect correlation between the risks, determines, in line with portfolio theory, a "diversification benefit". The issue of risk allocation subsequently arises when the risk value of the diversified aggregated loss needs to be reassigned to the different risk classes. A similar issue has been solved in the framework of cooperative Game Theory, where the Shapley value provides a player-specific contribution of the total surplus generated by the coalition. The paper proposes a novel application of the Shapley formula in the ICAAP context (Pillar II - economic view). In particular, we show that the Shapley value is the unique solution to the allocation problem of an overall risk value, granting the fundamental requested properties, including the efficiency one. An exemplificative model application is reported, as well as a comparison with a benchmark methodology. The experimental part shows the advantages of the novel approach in terms of precision and reliability of the estimates. Finally, it is important to mention that the presented framework can be applied also in other contexts such as, for instance, in the risk class attribution of the operational risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险聚合框架中Shapley值的风险分配
风险聚集的主题产生于需要在单一度量中包含对不同风险类型的总体暴露。一般来说,为风险整合而采用的方法是基于这样的原则:总体经济资本低于与个别风险相关的经济资本措施的简单代数总和。这种现象,由于风险之间存在不完全的相关性,根据投资组合理论,决定了“多元化利益”。当分散的汇总损失的风险价值需要重新分配到不同的风险类别时,风险分配的问题随之出现。在合作博弈论的框架中,一个类似的问题已经得到了解决,其中Shapley值提供了由联盟产生的总盈余中玩家特定的贡献。本文提出了Shapley公式在ICAAP背景下的一种新应用(第二支柱-经济观点)。特别地,我们证明了Shapley值是总体风险值分配问题的唯一解,它赋予了所要求的基本性质,包括效率性质。报告了一个示例模型应用程序,并与基准方法进行了比较。实验部分表明了该方法在估计精度和可靠性方面的优势。最后,重要的是要提到,所提出的框架也可以应用于其他上下文中,例如,在操作风险的风险类别归属中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The link between MiFID and Risk Appetite Framework as an application of best practices for wealth management and the entire value chain of the financial industry Operational Risk framework and Standardised Measurement Approach (SMA) Data Analytics for Credit Risk Models in Retail Banking: a new era for the banking system Modeling the interest rates term structure using Machine Learning: a Gaussian process regression approach Analysis of numerical integration schemes for the Heston model: a case study based on the pricing of investment certificates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1