Ethereum Price Prediction Comparison Using k-NN and Multiple Polynomial Regression

Nova Kristian, Fikri Adzikri, M. Rizkinia
{"title":"Ethereum Price Prediction Comparison Using k-NN and Multiple Polynomial Regression","authors":"Nova Kristian, Fikri Adzikri, M. Rizkinia","doi":"10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely used to predict future financial trends. It has become a tool for predicting future trends based on what is known beforehand. Like other financial stock markets, cryptocurrency has become a new sensation and challenge for investors to predict its behaviour. However, unlike other financial instruments, cryptocurrency has been renowned because of the difficulty to predict the price due to its volatility behaviour that changes so rapidly and since there is no fundamental economy for its value. This paper presents a performance comparison of two ML algorithms in predicting Ethereum price with non-time series analysis, which are k- Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) and multiple polynomial regression (MPR). The experiment used independent variables from related real-world economic fundamentals such as Dow Jones Index, gold price, oil price, and Ethereum volume. The experiment data was collected from the records from April 2017 until April 2021. For each algorithm, several methods of preprocessing data were used to match all independent data with the dependent data. Three different preprocessing scenarios were also used to find the maximum accuracy model. scenario 1 (feature selection based on correlation matrix), scenario 2 (feature selection based on correlation with the dependent variables and among independent variables), and scenario 3 (scenario 1 extracted with PCA). The performance of the compared methods was evaluated by using MSE and MAE. From the experiment, a comparison of results using two different models with k-NN and multiple polynomial regression is obtained. It is found that k-NN with a hyperparameter K = 2 have the best prediction with MSE = 449.032 and MAE = 14.282 compared with multiple polynomial regression with the best MSE = 13953.96 and MAE = 84.923.","PeriodicalId":446396,"journal":{"name":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely used to predict future financial trends. It has become a tool for predicting future trends based on what is known beforehand. Like other financial stock markets, cryptocurrency has become a new sensation and challenge for investors to predict its behaviour. However, unlike other financial instruments, cryptocurrency has been renowned because of the difficulty to predict the price due to its volatility behaviour that changes so rapidly and since there is no fundamental economy for its value. This paper presents a performance comparison of two ML algorithms in predicting Ethereum price with non-time series analysis, which are k- Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) and multiple polynomial regression (MPR). The experiment used independent variables from related real-world economic fundamentals such as Dow Jones Index, gold price, oil price, and Ethereum volume. The experiment data was collected from the records from April 2017 until April 2021. For each algorithm, several methods of preprocessing data were used to match all independent data with the dependent data. Three different preprocessing scenarios were also used to find the maximum accuracy model. scenario 1 (feature selection based on correlation matrix), scenario 2 (feature selection based on correlation with the dependent variables and among independent variables), and scenario 3 (scenario 1 extracted with PCA). The performance of the compared methods was evaluated by using MSE and MAE. From the experiment, a comparison of results using two different models with k-NN and multiple polynomial regression is obtained. It is found that k-NN with a hyperparameter K = 2 have the best prediction with MSE = 449.032 and MAE = 14.282 compared with multiple polynomial regression with the best MSE = 13953.96 and MAE = 84.923.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于k-NN和多元多项式回归的以太坊价格预测比较
机器学习(ML)算法已被广泛用于预测未来的金融趋势。它已经成为一种基于事先已知的预测未来趋势的工具。与其他金融股票市场一样,加密货币已经成为投资者预测其行为的新轰动和挑战。然而,与其他金融工具不同,加密货币之所以闻名,是因为其波动行为变化如此之快,难以预测价格,而且其价值没有基本的经济性。本文介绍了两种ML算法在使用非时间序列分析预测以太坊价格方面的性能比较,这两种算法分别是k-近邻(k- nn)和多元多项式回归(MPR)。该实验使用了来自相关现实世界经济基本面的独立变量,如道琼斯指数、黄金价格、油价和以太坊交易量。实验数据收集自2017年4月至2021年4月的记录。对于每种算法,使用几种预处理数据的方法将所有独立数据与相关数据进行匹配。采用三种不同的预处理方案来寻找最大精度模型。场景1(基于关联矩阵的特征选择)、场景2(基于因变量与自变量之间的相关性的特征选择)、场景3(基于PCA提取的场景1)。通过MSE和MAE对比较方法的性能进行了评价。通过实验,比较了k-NN和多元多项式回归两种不同模型的结果。结果表明,超参数K = 2的K - nn的预测效果最好,MSE = 449.032, MAE = 14.282,而多元多项式回归的预测效果最好,MSE = 13953.96, MAE = 84.923。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conference Schedule Automatic Essay Grading System for Japanese Language Exam using CNN-LSTM Design of Cross and Square Slot with Beamforming for Microstrip Reflectarray Antenna at 28 GHz Performance Analysis of YOLOv4 and SSD Mobilenet V2 for Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Detection at Airport Runway Using Custom Dataset Development of Greedy Power Allocation Round Robin Scheduling for 5.5G Traffic Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1