Reporting on Adverse Clinical Events

J. Dill
{"title":"Reporting on Adverse Clinical Events","authors":"J. Dill","doi":"10.1177/0069477020924640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A retrospective single-center cohort study compared the rates of nephrotoxicity in 300 patients who received continuous infusion or intermittent infusion vancomycin for at least 1 week in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.5 mg/dL or a 50% increase from baseline for 2 consecutive measurements. Clinical failure was defined as unplanned readmission, extension of therapy, or change in antibiotics. Continuous infusion vancomycin was associated with a 3.22fold lower risk of nephrotoxicity when compared with intermittent infusion (odds ratio = 3.22, 95% confidence interval = 1.10-9.46, P = .027). In addition, there was a significantly slower onset to nephrotoxicity (P = .035). There was no difference between the groups for clinical failure rates (13.5% vs 23.0%; P = .147). The authors concluded that continuous infusion vancomycin was associated with a lower risk of and slower onset to nephrotoxicity than intermittent vancomycin infusion. There was no difference between the groups in clinical failure rates. Vancomycin [Vancomycin] Shakeraneh P et al (WD Kufel, Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, PO Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000; e-mail: wkufel@binghamton.edu) Nephrotoxicity risk and clinical effectiveness of continuous versus intermittent infusion vancomycin among patients in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program. Pharmacotherapy 40:357–362 (Apr) 2020","PeriodicalId":102871,"journal":{"name":"Clin-Alert®","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clin-Alert®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0069477020924640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A retrospective single-center cohort study compared the rates of nephrotoxicity in 300 patients who received continuous infusion or intermittent infusion vancomycin for at least 1 week in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.5 mg/dL or a 50% increase from baseline for 2 consecutive measurements. Clinical failure was defined as unplanned readmission, extension of therapy, or change in antibiotics. Continuous infusion vancomycin was associated with a 3.22fold lower risk of nephrotoxicity when compared with intermittent infusion (odds ratio = 3.22, 95% confidence interval = 1.10-9.46, P = .027). In addition, there was a significantly slower onset to nephrotoxicity (P = .035). There was no difference between the groups for clinical failure rates (13.5% vs 23.0%; P = .147). The authors concluded that continuous infusion vancomycin was associated with a lower risk of and slower onset to nephrotoxicity than intermittent vancomycin infusion. There was no difference between the groups in clinical failure rates. Vancomycin [Vancomycin] Shakeraneh P et al (WD Kufel, Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, PO Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000; e-mail: wkufel@binghamton.edu) Nephrotoxicity risk and clinical effectiveness of continuous versus intermittent infusion vancomycin among patients in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program. Pharmacotherapy 40:357–362 (Apr) 2020
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不良临床事件报告
一项回顾性单中心队列研究比较了300例在门诊静脉注射万古霉素治疗方案中连续输注或间歇输注万古霉素至少1周的患者肾毒性发生率。肾毒性定义为连续2次测定血清肌酐升高超过0.5 mg/dL或较基线升高50%。临床失败被定义为意外再入院、延长治疗或改变抗生素。与间歇输注万古霉素相比,持续输注万古霉素的肾毒性风险降低3.22倍(优势比= 3.22,95%可信区间= 1.10-9.46,P = 0.027)。此外,肾毒性发作明显较慢(P = 0.035)。两组临床失败率无差异(13.5% vs 23.0%;P = .147)。作者得出结论,持续输注万古霉素与间歇性输注万古霉素相比,发生肾毒性的风险更低,发作速度更慢。两组间临床失败率无差异。万古霉素[万古霉素]Shakeraneh P et al (WD Kufel,宾厄姆顿大学药学院,邮政信箱6000,宾厄姆顿,纽约州13902-6000;e-mail: wkufel@binghamton.edu)在门诊静脉外抗微生物治疗项目中,持续输注万古霉素与间歇输注万古霉素的肾毒性风险和临床效果。药物治疗40:357-362(四月)2020
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reporting on Adverse Clinical Events Reporting on Adverse Clinical Events Reporting on Adverse Clinical Events Reporting on Adverse Clinical Events Reporting on Adverse Clinical Events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1