Analyzing Exfordance Use by Unilateral Upper-Limb Amputees* This work was supported by the US Army Medical Research & Materiel Command, grant W81XWH-14-1-0277.

J. Cochran, A. Spiers, A. Dollar
{"title":"Analyzing Exfordance Use by Unilateral Upper-Limb Amputees* This work was supported by the US Army Medical Research & Materiel Command, grant W81XWH-14-1-0277.","authors":"J. Cochran, A. Spiers, A. Dollar","doi":"10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans often use features of their environment for assistance in picking up and manipulating objects or in stabilizing their own bodies. This ‘exfordance’ use occurs when external contact or gravitational or inertial forces are utilized to aid in task completion or stabilization. This paper presents a categorization of exfordance use and applies the new framework to quantifying how experienced unilateral upper-limb amputees use of exfordances during everyday activities, both in their affected and unaffected limbs. Head-mounted cameras were used to record video footage of participants in their homes while they completed self-selected activities of daily living. A total of 35 minutes of dense manipulation footage has been analyzed for each of 5 trans-radial amputees with different prosthetic devices, resulting in over 4,700 instances of observed exfordance use. The results indicate that participants used exfordance-based vs. non exfordance-based manipulation strategies approximately the same amount with both their intact and prosthetic hands, after adjusting for overall hand use. Furthermore, the specific exfordance use strategies vary substantially between limbs, with participants using environmental surfaces such as tables to guide the motion of their unaffected hand more frequently than with their prosthetic hand, possibly due to increased control and passive conformation ability. Also, participants used gravity-based exfordances (e.g. hanging a towel over the hand) much more frequently with their prosthetic, likely due to its reduced grasping capabilities.","PeriodicalId":382522,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","volume":"18 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Humans often use features of their environment for assistance in picking up and manipulating objects or in stabilizing their own bodies. This ‘exfordance’ use occurs when external contact or gravitational or inertial forces are utilized to aid in task completion or stabilization. This paper presents a categorization of exfordance use and applies the new framework to quantifying how experienced unilateral upper-limb amputees use of exfordances during everyday activities, both in their affected and unaffected limbs. Head-mounted cameras were used to record video footage of participants in their homes while they completed self-selected activities of daily living. A total of 35 minutes of dense manipulation footage has been analyzed for each of 5 trans-radial amputees with different prosthetic devices, resulting in over 4,700 instances of observed exfordance use. The results indicate that participants used exfordance-based vs. non exfordance-based manipulation strategies approximately the same amount with both their intact and prosthetic hands, after adjusting for overall hand use. Furthermore, the specific exfordance use strategies vary substantially between limbs, with participants using environmental surfaces such as tables to guide the motion of their unaffected hand more frequently than with their prosthetic hand, possibly due to increased control and passive conformation ability. Also, participants used gravity-based exfordances (e.g. hanging a towel over the hand) much more frequently with their prosthetic, likely due to its reduced grasping capabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析单侧上肢截肢者的力量使用*这项工作得到了美国陆军医学研究与物资司令部的支持,授权W81XWH-14-1-0277。
人类经常利用环境的特征来帮助拿起和操纵物体或稳定自己的身体。当利用外部接触或重力或惯性力来帮助完成任务或稳定时,这种“增强”使用就会发生。本文提出了一种外伸性使用的分类,并应用新的框架来量化有经验的单侧上肢截肢者在日常活动中如何使用外伸性,无论是在他们的受影响的肢体还是未受影响的肢体。研究人员使用头戴式摄像机来记录参与者在家中完成自己选择的日常生活活动时的视频片段。对5名使用不同假肢装置的经桡骨截肢者进行了总共35分钟的密集操作镜头分析,结果观察到有4700多例使用外力。结果表明,在调整了手的整体使用情况后,参与者使用基于外伸性和非外伸性的操作策略的数量大致相同。此外,肢体之间具体的力量使用策略差异很大,参与者使用环境表面(如桌子)来指导他们未受影响的手的运动比使用假手更频繁,可能是由于控制力和被动构象能力的增强。此外,参与者更频繁地使用基于重力的出口(例如,在手上挂一条毛巾),可能是由于其抓握能力降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insect-Inspired Body Size Learning Model on a Humanoid Robot Yaw Postural Perturbation Through Robotic Platform: Aging Effects on Muscle Synergies Optimization-Based Analysis of a Cartwheel Quantifying Human Autonomy Recovery During Ankle Robot-Assisted Reversal of Foot Drop After Stroke ExoBoot, a Soft Inflatable Robotic Boot to Assist Ankle During Walking: Design, Characterization and Preliminary Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1