A Comparative Study of Multiple Linear Regression and K Nearest Neighbours using Machine Learning

Onima Tigga, Jaya Pal, D. Mustafi
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Multiple Linear Regression and K Nearest Neighbours using Machine Learning","authors":"Onima Tigga, Jaya Pal, D. Mustafi","doi":"10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent times, Machine Learning methods are widely used to handle large and complex data to generate interesting patterns and trends. Supervised Learning methods are generally used to classify different types of real life datasets. In this paper, the two methods Multiple Linear Regression and K Nearest Neighbours have been used to classify the quality of wine and compare the accuracy. As a result, it is found that K Nearest Neighbours gives the good accuracy. The calculated Mean Squared Error (MSE) and calculated Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) give the model perfection. Result shows that the value of MSE and RMSE applying K Nearest Neighbours (KNN) is higher than Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The classification performance of the methods is compared with their accuracy. Based on these methods, the highest accuracy of KNN with K = 5 is 0.9444. Meanwhile, for the Multiple Linear Regression, the accuracy reached to 0.6657. Also, MSE and RMSE are calculated as 0.0555 and 0.2357 for KNN with k=5. Multiple Linear Regression has MSE (0.1692) and RMSE (0.4113). The experimental result shows that KNN can be used as alternative method for predicting the new instances. From UCI Machine Learning Repository, the wine dataset is taken which are tested in this research paper.","PeriodicalId":180790,"journal":{"name":"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent times, Machine Learning methods are widely used to handle large and complex data to generate interesting patterns and trends. Supervised Learning methods are generally used to classify different types of real life datasets. In this paper, the two methods Multiple Linear Regression and K Nearest Neighbours have been used to classify the quality of wine and compare the accuracy. As a result, it is found that K Nearest Neighbours gives the good accuracy. The calculated Mean Squared Error (MSE) and calculated Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) give the model perfection. Result shows that the value of MSE and RMSE applying K Nearest Neighbours (KNN) is higher than Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The classification performance of the methods is compared with their accuracy. Based on these methods, the highest accuracy of KNN with K = 5 is 0.9444. Meanwhile, for the Multiple Linear Regression, the accuracy reached to 0.6657. Also, MSE and RMSE are calculated as 0.0555 and 0.2357 for KNN with k=5. Multiple Linear Regression has MSE (0.1692) and RMSE (0.4113). The experimental result shows that KNN can be used as alternative method for predicting the new instances. From UCI Machine Learning Repository, the wine dataset is taken which are tested in this research paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的多元线性回归与K近邻的比较研究
近年来,机器学习方法被广泛用于处理大型复杂数据,以生成有趣的模式和趋势。监督学习方法通常用于对不同类型的现实生活数据集进行分类。本文采用多元线性回归和K近邻两种方法对葡萄酒的质量进行分类,并比较准确率。结果表明,K个最近邻给出了较好的准确率。计算的均方误差(MSE)和计算的均方根误差(RMSE)使模型更加完善。结果表明,应用K近邻(KNN)的MSE和RMSE值高于多元线性回归(MLR)。比较了两种方法的分类性能和准确率。基于这些方法,K = 5的KNN准确率最高为0.9444。同时,对于多元线性回归,准确率达到0.6657。对于k=5的KNN, MSE和RMSE分别计算为0.0555和0.2357。多元线性回归的MSE为0.1692,RMSE为0.4113。实验结果表明,KNN可以作为预测新实例的替代方法。从UCI机器学习存储库中获取葡萄酒数据集,并在本文中进行了测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model of Markovian Queue with Catastrophe, Restoration and Balking Nibble Based Two Bit Invert Coding Technique for Serial Network on Chip Links Hesitant Triangular Fuzzy Dombi Operators and Its Applications Fuel Cost Optimization of Coal-Fired Power Plants using Coal Blending Proportions An Efficient Classification for Light Motor Vehicles using CatBoost Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1