Activities of pefloxacin and ofloxacin against mycobacteria: in vitro and mouse experiments

C. Truffot-Pernot, B. Ji, J. Grosset
{"title":"Activities of pefloxacin and ofloxacin against mycobacteria: in vitro and mouse experiments","authors":"C. Truffot-Pernot,&nbsp;B. Ji,&nbsp;J. Grosset","doi":"10.1016/0041-3879(91)90025-N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The minimal inhibitory concentrations for 90% of strains (MIC90) of ofloxacin against <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> and <em>Mycobacterium xenopi</em> was 2 mg/I. This was three dilutions lower than that of pefloxacin and was well within the range of drug concentrations achievable in man. The antituberculosis activities of both quinolones were independent of resistance of the strains to other antimycobacteriaI agents. <em>Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare</em> was resistant to both compounds with MIC90s greater than 16 mg/l. The maximum serum levels (C<sub>max</sub>) of both compounds increased proportionally with increasing dose size. The terminal elimination half-life (<span><math><mtext>T</mtext><msub><mi></mi><mn><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext></mn></msub></math></span>) of pefloxacin was longer than that of ofloxacin, but the <span><math><mtext>T</mtext><msub><mi></mi><mn><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext></mn></msub></math></span> of both compounds in mice were much shorter than in man. The area under the concentration curve (AUC) of pefloxacin was double than that of ofloxacin. In the mouse, pefloxacin at doses up to 150 mg/kg daily was inactive against <em>M. tuberculosis</em> infection: in terms of survival rate the minimal effective dose of ofloxacin against <em>M. tuberculosis</em> infection was 150 mg/kg daily when given by gavage or by incorporation into the mouse diet at a concentration of 0.1 %, but in terms of cfu counts, ofloxacin 150 mg/kg daily only displayed a moderate degree of activity similar to ethambutol 100 mg/kg daily. The therapeutic effects of ofloxacin against <em>M. tuberculosis</em> infection were dose-related: 300 mg/kg daily by gavage or 0.4% in mouse diet displayed much better therapeutic effects than lower dosages. Since the AUC in mice treated with ofloxacin 150 mg/kg daily is close to that in man treated with a clinically tolerated dose—600 mg daily—such a dosage may be only moderately effective against human tuberculosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23472,"journal":{"name":"Tubercle","volume":"72 1","pages":"Pages 57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0041-3879(91)90025-N","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tubercle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004138799190025N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

The minimal inhibitory concentrations for 90% of strains (MIC90) of ofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium xenopi was 2 mg/I. This was three dilutions lower than that of pefloxacin and was well within the range of drug concentrations achievable in man. The antituberculosis activities of both quinolones were independent of resistance of the strains to other antimycobacteriaI agents. Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare was resistant to both compounds with MIC90s greater than 16 mg/l. The maximum serum levels (Cmax) of both compounds increased proportionally with increasing dose size. The terminal elimination half-life (T12) of pefloxacin was longer than that of ofloxacin, but the T12 of both compounds in mice were much shorter than in man. The area under the concentration curve (AUC) of pefloxacin was double than that of ofloxacin. In the mouse, pefloxacin at doses up to 150 mg/kg daily was inactive against M. tuberculosis infection: in terms of survival rate the minimal effective dose of ofloxacin against M. tuberculosis infection was 150 mg/kg daily when given by gavage or by incorporation into the mouse diet at a concentration of 0.1 %, but in terms of cfu counts, ofloxacin 150 mg/kg daily only displayed a moderate degree of activity similar to ethambutol 100 mg/kg daily. The therapeutic effects of ofloxacin against M. tuberculosis infection were dose-related: 300 mg/kg daily by gavage or 0.4% in mouse diet displayed much better therapeutic effects than lower dosages. Since the AUC in mice treated with ofloxacin 150 mg/kg daily is close to that in man treated with a clinically tolerated dose—600 mg daily—such a dosage may be only moderately effective against human tuberculosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培氟沙星和氧氟沙星抗分枝杆菌活性的体外及小鼠实验
氧氟沙星对90%菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC90)为2 mg/I。这比培氟沙星的稀释度低三倍,完全在人体可达到的药物浓度范围内。这两种喹诺酮类药物的抗结核活性与菌株对其他抗结核药物的耐药性无关。鸟胞内分枝杆菌对两种化合物均有耐药,mic90均大于16 mg/l。两种化合物的最大血清水平(Cmax)随剂量的增加而成比例增加。培氟沙星的终末消除半衰期(T12)比氧氟沙星长,但两种化合物在小鼠体内的T12都比在人体内短得多。培氟沙星的浓度曲线下面积(AUC)是氧氟沙星的两倍。在小鼠中,每日150mg /kg剂量的氧氟沙星对结核支原体感染无活性:就存活率而言,每日150mg /kg氧氟沙星对结核支原体感染的最小有效剂量为150mg /kg灌胃或以0.1%的浓度掺入小鼠饮食中,但就cfu计数而言,每日150mg /kg氧氟沙星仅显示中等程度的活性,类似于每日100mg /kg乙胺丁醇。氧氟沙星对结核分枝杆菌感染的治疗效果与剂量相关,每日灌胃300 mg/kg或小鼠日粮中添加0.4%的氧氟沙星治疗效果明显好于低剂量。由于每天用150mg /kg氧氟沙星治疗小鼠的AUC接近于用临床耐受剂量(600mg /kg)治疗人类的AUC,这样的剂量对人类结核病可能只有中等效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Volume contents Mobilising the appropriate T-cell subset: the immune response as taxonomist? Severe skin reactions to thiacetazone in East Nepal Koch's phenomenon: can it be corrected?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1