Relaxed Hip Precautions Do Not Increase Early Dislocation Rate Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Matthew L. Brown, K. A. Ezzet
{"title":"Relaxed Hip Precautions Do Not Increase Early Dislocation Rate Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Matthew L. Brown, K. A. Ezzet","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nHistorically, hip precautions have been prescribed after total hip arthroplasty (THA) to limit certain motions felt to place the arthroplasty construct in a position at increased risk for dislocation. This study aimed to determine whether relaxed hip precautions after primary THA done via a posterolateral approach resulted in a higher early dislocation rate compared with standard hip precautions.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe hip precaution protocol was changed from standard to relaxed at our institution for all patients with THA in December 2016. One cohort had THA in the 18 months before the protocol change and had standard hip precautions, and the second cohort had THA in the 18 months after the protocol change and had relaxed precautions. We determined the early dislocation rate (within 3 months postoperatively) for both cohorts and controlled for selected demographic and surgical details.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe standard precaution group included 597 primary THAs and the relaxed precaution group included 692 hips. No notable differences were found between the groups in terms of age at surgery, body mass index, sex, laterality, or diagnosis. Early dislocation occurred in seven hips (1.2%) in the standard precaution cohort and in nine hips (1.4%) in the relaxed precaution cohort. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.77).\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nThe results of our study suggest that well-trained, high-volume surgeons may potentially relax hip precautions prescribed to the patients after primary THA done via a posterolateral approach without subjecting patients to a markedly higher incidence of dislocation. However, unlike previous studies, this study controlled for femoral head size, which is a well-known confounder for dislocation risk.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"333 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Historically, hip precautions have been prescribed after total hip arthroplasty (THA) to limit certain motions felt to place the arthroplasty construct in a position at increased risk for dislocation. This study aimed to determine whether relaxed hip precautions after primary THA done via a posterolateral approach resulted in a higher early dislocation rate compared with standard hip precautions. METHODS The hip precaution protocol was changed from standard to relaxed at our institution for all patients with THA in December 2016. One cohort had THA in the 18 months before the protocol change and had standard hip precautions, and the second cohort had THA in the 18 months after the protocol change and had relaxed precautions. We determined the early dislocation rate (within 3 months postoperatively) for both cohorts and controlled for selected demographic and surgical details. RESULTS The standard precaution group included 597 primary THAs and the relaxed precaution group included 692 hips. No notable differences were found between the groups in terms of age at surgery, body mass index, sex, laterality, or diagnosis. Early dislocation occurred in seven hips (1.2%) in the standard precaution cohort and in nine hips (1.4%) in the relaxed precaution cohort. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.77). DISCUSSION The results of our study suggest that well-trained, high-volume surgeons may potentially relax hip precautions prescribed to the patients after primary THA done via a posterolateral approach without subjecting patients to a markedly higher incidence of dislocation. However, unlike previous studies, this study controlled for femoral head size, which is a well-known confounder for dislocation risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放松髋关节预防措施不会增加全髋关节置换术后早期脱位率。
从历史上看,在全髋关节置换术(THA)后,髋关节预防措施被规定为限制某些运动,以使关节置换术结构处于脱位风险增加的位置。本研究旨在确定与标准髋关节预防措施相比,经后外侧入路行原发性THA术后放松髋关节预防措施是否会导致更高的早期脱位率。方法2016年12月,我院所有THA患者髋关节预防方案由标准改为宽松。一组患者在方案改变前18个月有THA,有标准的髋关节预防措施;另一组患者在方案改变后18个月有THA,有宽松的预防措施。我们确定了两个队列的早期脱位率(术后3个月内),并控制了选定的人口统计学和手术细节。结果标准预防组原发性tha 597例,宽松预防组692例。两组在手术年龄、体重指数、性别、侧边性或诊断方面没有发现显著差异。在标准预防组中有7髋(1.2%)发生早期脱位,在放松预防组中有9髋(1.4%)发生早期脱位。差异无统计学意义(P = 0.77)。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,训练有素的大容量外科医生可能会放松经后外侧入路行原发性THA后患者的髋关节预防措施,而不会使患者发生明显更高的脱位发生率。然而,与以往的研究不同,本研究控制了股骨头大小,这是众所周知的脱位风险混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Cemented Implants Placed During Initial TKA on Surgical Time and Expenses in Revision TKA. Cannabis Use Disorder Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications After Hip or Knee Arthroplasties: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Hydrogen Peroxide May Reduce the Risk for Revision Surgery and Infection in Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty: Two-year Follow-up From a Prospective, Blinded, Controlled Trial. Diagnosis and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Evaluation of Preoperative Variables that Improve the Predictive Accuracy of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1