Precise Static Happens-Before Analysis for Detecting UAF Order Violations in Android

Diyu Wu, Jie Liu, Yulei Sui, Shiping Chen, Jingling Xue
{"title":"Precise Static Happens-Before Analysis for Detecting UAF Order Violations in Android","authors":"Diyu Wu, Jie Liu, Yulei Sui, Shiping Chen, Jingling Xue","doi":"10.1109/ICST.2019.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike Java, Android provides a rich set of APIs to support a hybrid concurrency system, which consists of both Java threads and an event queue mechanism for dispatching asynchronous events. In this model, concurrency errors often manifest themselves in the form of order violations. An order violation occurs when two events access the same shared object in an incorrect order, causing unexpected program behaviors (e.g., null pointer dereferences). This paper presents SARD, a static analysis tool for detecting both intra-and inter-thread use-after-free (UAF) order violations, when a pointer is dereferenced (used) after it no longer points to any valid object, through systematic modeling of Android's concurrency mechanism. We propose a new flow-and context-sensitive static happens-before (HB) analysis to reason about the interleavings between two events to effectively identify precise HB relations and eliminate spurious event interleavings. We have evaluated SARD by comparing with NADROID, a state-of-the-art static order violation detection tool for Android. SARD outperforms NADROID in terms of both precision (by reporting three times fewer false alarms than NADROID given the same set of apps used by NADROID) and efficiency (by running two orders of magnitude faster than NADROID).","PeriodicalId":446827,"journal":{"name":"2019 12th IEEE Conference on Software Testing, Validation and Verification (ICST)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 12th IEEE Conference on Software Testing, Validation and Verification (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2019.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Unlike Java, Android provides a rich set of APIs to support a hybrid concurrency system, which consists of both Java threads and an event queue mechanism for dispatching asynchronous events. In this model, concurrency errors often manifest themselves in the form of order violations. An order violation occurs when two events access the same shared object in an incorrect order, causing unexpected program behaviors (e.g., null pointer dereferences). This paper presents SARD, a static analysis tool for detecting both intra-and inter-thread use-after-free (UAF) order violations, when a pointer is dereferenced (used) after it no longer points to any valid object, through systematic modeling of Android's concurrency mechanism. We propose a new flow-and context-sensitive static happens-before (HB) analysis to reason about the interleavings between two events to effectively identify precise HB relations and eliminate spurious event interleavings. We have evaluated SARD by comparing with NADROID, a state-of-the-art static order violation detection tool for Android. SARD outperforms NADROID in terms of both precision (by reporting three times fewer false alarms than NADROID given the same set of apps used by NADROID) and efficiency (by running two orders of magnitude faster than NADROID).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精确的静态发生-在Android中检测UAF秩序违规之前的分析
与Java不同,Android提供了一组丰富的api来支持混合并发系统,该系统由Java线程和用于调度异步事件的事件队列机制组成。在这个模型中,并发性错误通常以违反顺序的形式表现出来。当两个事件以不正确的顺序访问同一个共享对象时,就会发生顺序冲突,从而导致意外的程序行为(例如,空指针解引用)。本文通过对Android并发机制的系统建模,提出了一种静态分析工具SARD,用于检测指针在不再指向任何有效对象后被解引用(使用)时线程内和线程间的UAF顺序违规。我们提出了一种新的流和上下文敏感的静态事件前(HB)分析来解释两个事件之间的交错,从而有效地识别精确的HB关系并消除虚假的事件交错。我们通过比较NADROID来评估SARD, NADROID是Android上最先进的静态订单违规检测工具。SARD在精度(给定NADROID使用的相同应用程序集,SARD报告的假警报比NADROID少三倍)和效率(运行速度比NADROID快两个数量级)方面都优于NADROID。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parallel Many-Objective Search for Unit Tests SeqFuzzer: An Industrial Protocol Fuzzing Framework from a Deep Learning Perspective Classifying False Positive Static Checker Alarms in Continuous Integration Using Convolutional Neural Networks Automated Function Assessment in Driving Scenarios Techniques for Evolution-Aware Runtime Verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1