Do Geopolitical Risk Factors and Economic Policy Uncertainties Stimulate Capital Outflows? An Updated Evidence.

E. Uche, N. Nwaeze, Rowland Tochukwu Obiakor
{"title":"Do Geopolitical Risk Factors and Economic Policy Uncertainties Stimulate Capital Outflows? An Updated Evidence.","authors":"E. Uche, N. Nwaeze, Rowland Tochukwu Obiakor","doi":"10.25115/eea.v40i3.6971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most developing countries are making frantic efforts to curtail illicit outflows of investible funds. Unfortunately, these efforts seem not to have produced the expected results. Meanwhile, existing empirical investigations have failed to explain emphatically, the channels through which this economic sabotage is being perpetuated. In this context, this study scrutinizes whether geopolitical risk factors (GPR) and economic policy uncertainty (EPU) stimulate the outflows of illicit capital from South Africa over 1985 – 2018 while controlling for the influence of national income, trade openness, foreign direct investments (FDI) and population. Preliminary investigations confirmed co-integration among the series. Furthermore, it is established that capital flight is a systemic problem considering its significant short-run autoregressive effect. Further evidence from the ARDL model indicates that GPR and EPU exert significant positive impacts on capital flight only within the short-run, whereas FDI produces a positive and significant influence on capital outflows at all times. The influence of FDI on illicit capital outflow is also consistent when the Kernel Regularised Least Squares (KRLS) model was applied, such that its positive and significant influence was also observed both on the average and across all quantiles of the distributions of capital migrations. Therefore, to curtail capital flight, policymakers must keep an eye on the inflows and outflows of FDI. Meanwhile, GPR and EPU are not long-term predictors of capital migrations from South Africa. The findings of this investigation could be equally beneficial to other countries battling with capital flight.     ","PeriodicalId":210068,"journal":{"name":"Studies of Applied Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies of Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v40i3.6971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most developing countries are making frantic efforts to curtail illicit outflows of investible funds. Unfortunately, these efforts seem not to have produced the expected results. Meanwhile, existing empirical investigations have failed to explain emphatically, the channels through which this economic sabotage is being perpetuated. In this context, this study scrutinizes whether geopolitical risk factors (GPR) and economic policy uncertainty (EPU) stimulate the outflows of illicit capital from South Africa over 1985 – 2018 while controlling for the influence of national income, trade openness, foreign direct investments (FDI) and population. Preliminary investigations confirmed co-integration among the series. Furthermore, it is established that capital flight is a systemic problem considering its significant short-run autoregressive effect. Further evidence from the ARDL model indicates that GPR and EPU exert significant positive impacts on capital flight only within the short-run, whereas FDI produces a positive and significant influence on capital outflows at all times. The influence of FDI on illicit capital outflow is also consistent when the Kernel Regularised Least Squares (KRLS) model was applied, such that its positive and significant influence was also observed both on the average and across all quantiles of the distributions of capital migrations. Therefore, to curtail capital flight, policymakers must keep an eye on the inflows and outflows of FDI. Meanwhile, GPR and EPU are not long-term predictors of capital migrations from South Africa. The findings of this investigation could be equally beneficial to other countries battling with capital flight.     
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大多数发展中国家都在不遗余力地遏制可投资资金的非法外流。不幸的是,这些努力似乎没有产生预期的结果。与此同时,现有的实证调查未能有力地解释这种经济破坏持续存在的渠道。在此背景下,本研究在控制国民收入、贸易开放程度、外国直接投资(FDI)和人口的影响的同时,仔细研究了1985年至2018年期间地缘政治风险因素(GPR)和经济政策不确定性(EPU)是否刺激了非法资本从南非流出。初步调查证实了这一系列的协整。此外,考虑到资本外逃具有显著的短期自回归效应,本文认为资本外逃是一个系统性问题。ARDL模型的进一步证据表明,GPR和EPU仅在短期内对资本外逃产生显著的正影响,而FDI在任何时候都对资本外流产生显著的正影响。当应用核正则化最小二乘(KRLS)模型时,外国直接投资对非法资本外流的影响也是一致的,因此在资本迁移分布的平均和所有分位数上也观察到其积极和显著的影响。因此,为了遏制资本外逃,政策制定者必须密切关注外国直接投资的流入和流出。同时,GPR和EPU并不是南非资本迁移的长期预测指标。这项调查的结果可能对其他正在与资本外逃作斗争的国家同样有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Survey on the Spanish Electricity Intraday Market A synergetic vision of advertising as stimuli to enhance sales Study on the Impact of Managerial Entrenchment and Corporate Governance of Firm Performance and Capital Structure Editorial for Special Issue on ‘Advances in Econometric Modeling: Theory and Applications’ Clustering analysis on Hurst dynamic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1