PERJANJIAN BAKU YANG MEMUAT KLAUSULA EKSONERASI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN

Shinta Rachmaniyah, Dipo Wahyoeno
{"title":"PERJANJIAN BAKU YANG MEMUAT KLAUSULA EKSONERASI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN","authors":"Shinta Rachmaniyah, Dipo Wahyoeno","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The birth of a standard agreement containing an exoneration clause basically intends to provide easier and more practical access for the parties who will enter into an agreement. The prohibition on using the transfer of responsibility clause can be seen in the rule of law in Indonesia, which is located in Article 18 of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. In this case, the issue raised is how the exoneration clause applies in the standard agreement from the point of view of consumer protection law. In this study, the research method used by the author is a normative legal research method that uses a statutory approach or the so-called statute approach, a conceptual approach or the so-called conceptual approach and views according to experts. The results of the study show that the Standard Agreement which contains an exoneration clause can create legal consequences for consumers, namely the obligations that should be borne by the seller or business actor are the obligations of the buyer or consumer. UUPK or Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection requires sellers or business actors to immediately match the standard agreement used for the provisions of the law, but in implementation this is difficult to enforce. Procedures and prohibitions regarding the application of standard agreements are planned to occupy the position of the buyer or consumer commensurate with the seller or business actor in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract and also prevent the emergence of actions that can later be detrimental to the buyer or consumer due to the lack of understanding, the buyer or consumer is exploited by the perpetrator. effort and also an equal position between the two parties. If the seller or business actor has set a standard clause that is prohibited in the agreement, the legal consequences of the standard clause are declared null and void.","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The birth of a standard agreement containing an exoneration clause basically intends to provide easier and more practical access for the parties who will enter into an agreement. The prohibition on using the transfer of responsibility clause can be seen in the rule of law in Indonesia, which is located in Article 18 of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. In this case, the issue raised is how the exoneration clause applies in the standard agreement from the point of view of consumer protection law. In this study, the research method used by the author is a normative legal research method that uses a statutory approach or the so-called statute approach, a conceptual approach or the so-called conceptual approach and views according to experts. The results of the study show that the Standard Agreement which contains an exoneration clause can create legal consequences for consumers, namely the obligations that should be borne by the seller or business actor are the obligations of the buyer or consumer. UUPK or Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection requires sellers or business actors to immediately match the standard agreement used for the provisions of the law, but in implementation this is difficult to enforce. Procedures and prohibitions regarding the application of standard agreements are planned to occupy the position of the buyer or consumer commensurate with the seller or business actor in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract and also prevent the emergence of actions that can later be detrimental to the buyer or consumer due to the lack of understanding, the buyer or consumer is exploited by the perpetrator. effort and also an equal position between the two parties. If the seller or business actor has set a standard clause that is prohibited in the agreement, the legal consequences of the standard clause are declared null and void.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从消费者保护法的角度来看,包含EKSONERASI条款的标准协议
包含免责条款的标准协议的诞生基本上是为了为签订协议的各方提供更容易和更实际的途径。禁止使用责任转移条款可以从印度尼西亚的法治中看出来,它位于第18号法律。关于消费者保护的1999年第8号法令。在本案例中,提出的问题是从消费者保护法的角度来看,免责条款如何适用于标准协议。在本研究中,笔者使用的研究方法是一种规范性的法律研究方法,即采用成文法方法或所谓的法规方法,采用概念方法或所谓的概念方法和专家的观点。研究结果表明,包含免责条款的标准协议可以对消费者产生法律后果,即应由卖方或商业行为人承担的义务是买方或消费者的义务。UUPK或法律编号关于消费者保护的1999年第8号法令要求销售者或商业行为者立即符合用于法律规定的标准协议,但在实施中很难执行。关于适用标准协议的程序和禁令是为了按照合同自由原则占据买方或消费者与卖方或商业行为人相称的地位,并防止由于买方或消费者被行为人利用而缺乏理解而可能在以后对买方或消费者有害的行为的出现。双方的努力和地位也是平等的。如果卖方或商业行为人设置了在协议中被禁止的标准条款,则该标准条款的法律后果被宣布无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MELARIKAN WANITA YANG BELUM CUKUP UMUR PUTUSAN /36/Pid.B/2019 PN GST TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 310 KUHP ANALISIS HUKUM KEBIJAKAN KELEBIHAN DIMENSI DAN KELEBIHAN MUATAN TERHADAP DEMONSTRAN GERAKAN SOPIR JAWA TIMUR ANALISIS HUKUM KONTEN NEGATIF DI PLATFORM YOUTUBE DI INDONESIA KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA E-LITIGASI BERLANDASKAN NILAI KEADILAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1