Amplitude Supported Prospects, Analysis and Predictive Models for Reducing Risk of Geological Success

I. Tishchenko, I. Mallinson
{"title":"Amplitude Supported Prospects, Analysis and Predictive Models for Reducing Risk of Geological Success","authors":"I. Tishchenko, I. Mallinson","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201902191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators (DHI) are commonly used for exploration prospects. Amplitudes as an independent source of information could be used as conditional probability within Bayes Theorem to assess risk of geological success. Following research is aiming to construct predictive model for estimating probability of hydrocarbons observing DHI, P(dhi|hc). In order to build such model, we used Rose & Associates DHI Interpretation and Risk Analysis Consortium database, which contains extensive descriptions of 336 drilled prospects, with known results, across various categories: Geology, Data Quality, Amplitude Characteristics and Pitfalls. Multiple Logistic Regression was used for predicting probability P(dhi|hc). Three methods were considered within the study: two data-driven models - stepwise regression and lasso shrinkage method plus the third one, a combination of data-and expertise- driven approach - stepwise regression plus manual addition of predictors to the model. All three models with key predictors are described and give similar accuracy of prediction − 77%. Performed data analysis and calculated models reveal several insights into R&A DHI Consortium database and amplitude prospects characterisation. The best method to create such models is probably a combination of data and expertise driven approaches, while selection of most appropriate model is a question of company's strategy.","PeriodicalId":186806,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geostatistics 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators (DHI) are commonly used for exploration prospects. Amplitudes as an independent source of information could be used as conditional probability within Bayes Theorem to assess risk of geological success. Following research is aiming to construct predictive model for estimating probability of hydrocarbons observing DHI, P(dhi|hc). In order to build such model, we used Rose & Associates DHI Interpretation and Risk Analysis Consortium database, which contains extensive descriptions of 336 drilled prospects, with known results, across various categories: Geology, Data Quality, Amplitude Characteristics and Pitfalls. Multiple Logistic Regression was used for predicting probability P(dhi|hc). Three methods were considered within the study: two data-driven models - stepwise regression and lasso shrinkage method plus the third one, a combination of data-and expertise- driven approach - stepwise regression plus manual addition of predictors to the model. All three models with key predictors are described and give similar accuracy of prediction − 77%. Performed data analysis and calculated models reveal several insights into R&A DHI Consortium database and amplitude prospects characterisation. The best method to create such models is probably a combination of data and expertise driven approaches, while selection of most appropriate model is a question of company's strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少地质成功风险的振幅支持勘探、分析和预测模型
直接油气指示(DHI)是勘探前景的常用方法。振幅作为一个独立的信息来源,可以作为贝叶斯定理中的条件概率来评估地质成功的风险。本文旨在建立油气观测DHI, P(DHI |hc)概率的预测模型。为了建立这样的模型,我们使用了Rose & Associates的DHI解释和风险分析联盟数据库,该数据库包含了336个钻探前景的广泛描述,并具有不同类别的已知结果:地质、数据质量、振幅特征和陷阱。采用多元Logistic回归预测概率P(dhi|hc)。研究中考虑了三种方法:两种数据驱动模型-逐步回归和套索收缩法加上第三种,数据和专业知识驱动方法的组合-逐步回归加上手动添加预测因子到模型中。描述了所有三个具有关键预测因子的模型,并给出了相似的预测精度- 77%。执行的数据分析和计算模型揭示了R&A DHI联盟数据库和振幅前景特征的几个见解。创建此类模型的最佳方法可能是数据和专业知识驱动方法的结合,而选择最合适的模型则是公司战略的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forward Model Applied to Channelized Turbidite Systems: A Case Study of the Benin Major Valley Fill Stochastic Seismic Inversion Based on a Fuzzy Model A Bayesian Approach for Full-waveform Inversion Using Wide-aperture Seismic Data Ensemble-based Kernel Learning to Handle Rock-physics-model Imperfection in Seismic History Matching: A Real Field Case Study Features of Factor Models in Seismic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1