Managing Diversity and Inclusion in the Global Value Chain

Mustafa F Ozbilgin
{"title":"Managing Diversity and Inclusion in the Global Value Chain","authors":"Mustafa F Ozbilgin","doi":"10.31031/siam.2019.01.000508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although many global and multinational organizations today have global diversity management statements, strategies and policies, their practices of diversity tend to remain local at the national level, rather than to comply with the global policies that organizations espouse to have [1-3]. There are significant reasons for this. First, diversity means different things across different countries as history gives meaning to diversity and inclusion [4-7]. For example, in the case of Britain the colonial past and therefore multiculturalism has been the dominant rationale for diversity [5]. Yet, in the case of Germany, the Nazi past prevents measurement and discussion of race and ethnic diversity unlike the way it is customary in English speaking countries Al Ariss et al. Second owing to significant differences among social movements and historical context that give meaning to categories of diversity and inclusion, highly varied priorities, practices and regulatory schemes have developed in each country [8]. Third, laws that regulate the diversity and Inclusion in organizations are national rather than global or international in nature, which means that in the absence of international laws in this field, cross-nationally consistent regulation of global organizations for diversity and inclusion remains an aloof ideal [9].","PeriodicalId":158514,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Accounting and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/siam.2019.01.000508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although many global and multinational organizations today have global diversity management statements, strategies and policies, their practices of diversity tend to remain local at the national level, rather than to comply with the global policies that organizations espouse to have [1-3]. There are significant reasons for this. First, diversity means different things across different countries as history gives meaning to diversity and inclusion [4-7]. For example, in the case of Britain the colonial past and therefore multiculturalism has been the dominant rationale for diversity [5]. Yet, in the case of Germany, the Nazi past prevents measurement and discussion of race and ethnic diversity unlike the way it is customary in English speaking countries Al Ariss et al. Second owing to significant differences among social movements and historical context that give meaning to categories of diversity and inclusion, highly varied priorities, practices and regulatory schemes have developed in each country [8]. Third, laws that regulate the diversity and Inclusion in organizations are national rather than global or international in nature, which means that in the absence of international laws in this field, cross-nationally consistent regulation of global organizations for diversity and inclusion remains an aloof ideal [9].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理全球价值链中的多样性和包容性
尽管今天许多全球性和跨国组织都有全球多样性管理声明、战略和政策,但它们的多样性实践往往停留在国家层面的地方,而不是遵守组织支持的全球政策[1-3]。这是有重要原因的。首先,多样性在不同的国家意味着不同的东西,因为历史赋予了多样性和包容性意义[4-7]。例如,在英国的情况下,殖民历史和因此的多元文化主义一直是多样性的主要理由[5]。然而,就德国而言,纳粹的过去阻止了对种族和民族多样性的衡量和讨论,这与英语国家的习惯方式不同。其次,由于赋予多样性和包容性类别意义的社会运动和历史背景之间的显著差异,每个国家都制定了高度不同的优先事项、实践和监管计划[8]。第三,规范组织多样性和包容性的法律是国家性的,而不是全球性的或国际性的,这意味着在缺乏这一领域的国际法的情况下,跨国组织对多样性和包容性的统一监管仍然是一种超然的理想[9]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Application of Business Analytics for Performance Management: The Results of Some Exploratory Case Studies The Hawke Government and the Accord at 40-Lessons for Albanese? Review of the IASB and FASB Joint Converged Framework A Report on Issues Faced by the Business Leaders in Today’s Scenario Greek Corporate Failure Using a Logit Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1