Juridical Analysis Of Holding State-Owned Enterprises In The View Of Corporate Law And Competition Law

Selia Putri, Azhar Yahya
{"title":"Juridical Analysis Of Holding State-Owned Enterprises In The View Of Corporate Law And Competition Law","authors":"Selia Putri, Azhar Yahya","doi":"10.24815/sklj.v6i1.26267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyse the status and Position of subsidiaries company of Holding State-Owned Enterprises and to find out regulate of Holding State-owned Enterprises in the view of Corporate Law and Competition Law. The result showed that Subsidiaries of Holding Stateowned Enterprises have a different status from State-owned Enterprises and have the same position as SOEs in certain aspects. This is based on Article 2A paragraph (7) of Government Regulation No. 72 of 2016, which states that SOEs Holding Subsidiaries are treated the same as SOEs in terms of (1) obtaining government assignments or performing public services; and/or (2) obtaining special State and/or Government policies, including in the management of Natural Resources, with special treatment certain conditions as applied to SOEs. The regulation of SOE holdings, Government Regulation No. 72 of 2016, does not comply with Article 51 Prohibition of Monopolistic Practice and Unfair Competition Law No. 5 of 1999. This is based on the implementation guidelines of Article 51 of Act No. 5 of 1999 State concentration of activities or monopolies cannot be regulated by government regulations, but shall be regulated by law.","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i1.26267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the status and Position of subsidiaries company of Holding State-Owned Enterprises and to find out regulate of Holding State-owned Enterprises in the view of Corporate Law and Competition Law. The result showed that Subsidiaries of Holding Stateowned Enterprises have a different status from State-owned Enterprises and have the same position as SOEs in certain aspects. This is based on Article 2A paragraph (7) of Government Regulation No. 72 of 2016, which states that SOEs Holding Subsidiaries are treated the same as SOEs in terms of (1) obtaining government assignments or performing public services; and/or (2) obtaining special State and/or Government policies, including in the management of Natural Resources, with special treatment certain conditions as applied to SOEs. The regulation of SOE holdings, Government Regulation No. 72 of 2016, does not comply with Article 51 Prohibition of Monopolistic Practice and Unfair Competition Law No. 5 of 1999. This is based on the implementation guidelines of Article 51 of Act No. 5 of 1999 State concentration of activities or monopolies cannot be regulated by government regulations, but shall be regulated by law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司法与竞争法视角下的国有控股企业法律分析
本研究旨在分析国有控股企业子公司的地位和地位,并从公司法和竞争法的角度对国有控股企业进行规制。结果表明,国有控股企业子公司与国有企业的地位不同,在某些方面与国有企业的地位相同。这是基于2016年第72号政府法规第2A条第(7)款,该条款规定国有企业控股子公司在以下方面与国有企业享有同等待遇:(1)获得政府任务或提供公共服务;和/或(2)获得国家和/或政府的特殊政策,包括在自然资源管理方面的政策,以及适用于国有企业的特殊待遇和某些条件。2016年第72号政府条例对国有企业控股的规定不符合1999年第5号《禁止垄断和不正当竞争法》第51条的规定。这是基于1999年第5号法第51条的实施指导方针,国家集中活动或垄断不能由政府法规加以管制,而应由法律加以管制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Integration of Judicial Review in Indonesia Aceh’s Government Role Implementation in Overcoming Emergency of Natural Disaster and Outbreak of Diseases LEGAL STUDY ON THE ACTION OF PKPU ADMINISTRATORS THAT CONDUCTED ILLEGAL INCREASE OF CREDITORS’ RECEIVABLES The Perspectives of Legal Progressivism Concerning Song Royalty Payments Actions By KPI As A Supervisory Institution Against Advertisements That Violate Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1